Application of a Whole-Building Hygrothermal model in energy,durability,and indoor humidity retrofit design

Abstract

A building shall be classified as high performance building if it is energy efficient and durable and at the same time provides comfortable and healthy indoor environment for occupants. To achieve this objective, the hygrothermal performance of alternative building designs should be evaluated based on the simultaneous analysis of these three functional requirements rather than separately. In this article, a Whole-Building Hygrothermal model is used for evaluation of various retrofit design parameters that potentially enhance the overall performance of an existing residential house. The retrofit options considered in this study include changes to the reference house’s ventilation rate and operation, windows, insulation level, and various combinations of these options. Energy efficiency, building envelope and moisture management potential, indoor humidity control, and window condensation potentials are considered to be the four performance indicators in searching for a retrofit option that delivers an optimal performance. The hygrothermal simulation results indicate that changing a design parameter to improve one of the design goals may result in less optimal results in the other one or both goals, or even in some cases result in severe negative consequences.

Keywords

Whole-building hygrothermal performance integrated HAM analysis energy simulation durability assessment indoor air humidity analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ASHRAE (2009) ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.

ASHRAE Standard 160P (2009) Criteria for Moisture-Control Design Analysis in Buildings. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.

ASHRAE Standard 62.2 (2010) Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.

Bomberg

Onysko

(2002) Heat, air and moisture control in walls of Canadian houses: a review of the historic basis for current practices. Journal of Building Physics 26(1): 3–31.

CMHC (1996) Report from CMHC. Ventilation and air quality testing in electrically heated housing. Journal of Thermal Insulation and Envelopes 20: 14–17.

Elmroth

(1993) Moisture design planning in the building process. Journal of Thermal Insulation and Envelopes 17: 95–102.

Hager

(1985) Problems with energy conservation. Journal of Thermal Insulation and Envelopes 8: 233–245.

Hens

(1992) IEA annex 14: condensation and energy. Journal of Thermal Insulation and Envelopes 15: 261–273.

Hood

(2006) Field survey of indoor and outdoor climatic conditions and airtightness level prevailing in two Northern housing regions. Status report: Carmacks survey. Report submitted to NRC-IRC, March 2006, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

10.

Hubbs

Orlowski

Finch

(2010) High performance building enclosures cause condensation and indoor air quality problems: the need for integrated design and improved investigation protocols. In: Symposium on building envelope technology, San Antonio, Texas, 8–9 November 2010, pp. 99–110. RCI-Inc.

11.

IEA (2008) Annex 41 Whole Building Heat, Air and Moisture Response, Modeling and Principles and Common Exercises. IEA, Leuven, Belgium, 234 pp.

12.

ISO/DIS 13790 (2005) Thermal Performance of Buildings—Calculation of Energy Use for Space Heating and Cooling (ISO TC 163/SC 2). Geneva: ISO.

13.

Jones

(1995) Indoor humidity calculation procedures. Building Services Engineering Research & Technology 16(3): 119–126.

14.

Kalagasidis

Mattsson

(2005) Modelling of moisture conditions in a cold attic space. In: AIVC 26th conference, proceeding, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre, Brussels, 21–23 September, pp. 53–58.

15.

Kumaran

Lackey

Normandin

. (2002) A thermal and moisture transport property database for common building and insulating materials. Final report—ASHRAE research project 1018-RP, July, p. 229.

16.

Kunzel

(1995) Simultaneous heat and moisture transport in building components: one- and two-dimensional calculation using simple parameters. PhD Thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart.

17.

Kunzel

(2007) Factors determining surface moisture on external walls. In: Proceedings of thermal performance of the exterior envelopes of buildings X, Clearwater Beach, FL, 4–7 December, pp. 1–6. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

18.

National Building Code of Canada (2010) National Research Council Canada, Ottawa.

19.

Rode

Grau

(2008) Moisture buffering and its consequence in whole building hygrothermal modeling. Journal of Building Physics 31(4): 330–360.

20.

Rousseau

Manning

Said

. (2007) Characterization of indoor hygrothermal conditions in houses in different Northern climates. In Thermal performance of the exterior envelopes of whole buildings X international conference, Clearwater Beach, FL, 2–7 December, pp. 1–14. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

21.

Stad

(2006) Energuide and condition report summary. February 2006, Carmacks, YT, Canada, 16 pp.

22.

Tariku

(2008) Whole building heat and moisture analysis. PhD Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

23.

Tariku

Kumaran

Fazio

(2008) Thermostat setback effect in whole building performance. In: Symposium on building physics, Luven, Belgium, 29–31 October 2008.

24.

Tariku

Kumaran

Fazio

(2010) Integrated analysis of whole-building heat, air and moisture transfer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 53(15–16): 3111–3120.

25.

Tariku

Kumaran

Fazio

(2011) Determination of indoor humidity profile using a whole-building hygrothermal model. Building Simulation: An International Journal 4(1): 61–78.

26.

Tenwolde

Rose

(1996) Moisture control strategies for the building envelope. Journal of Building Physics 19(3): 206–214.