The effectiveness of using reinforcements in the classroom on the academic achievement of students with intellectual disabilities

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two kinds of reinforcements, tangible reinforcements and social reinforcements, on the academic achievement of eighth-grade female students with intellectual disabilities in the science subject. The study was an experimental method by pretest, with a control group. The participants of the study comprised 45 female students with intellectual disabilities from three different middle schools in the province of Tehran. The multistage cluster method was chosen to determine the sample. The Wechsler intelligence test for matching the groups in terms of IQ and teacher-applied tests were used for all students to measure the progress of students in science. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. The results showed that (a) there was a significant difference in the academic achievement scores of the groups after applying the intervention and (b) the mean difference in achievement scores for the tangible reinforcements group was significantly higher than the social reinforcement group and the control group. Also the mean scores for the social reinforcement group were significantly higher than the control group.

Keywords

intellectual disability token economy social reinforcements

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of Mental Retardation (2002) Definition, Classification and Systems of Supports (10th ed.). Washington: American Association of Mental Retardation.

Bafile

(2005) Token economies yield promising results. Available at: EducationWorldWebsite: http://www.educationworld.com/a_curr/profdev/pofdev115.shtml (accessed 7 October 2006)

Cameron

Banko

Pierce

(2001) Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: the myth continues. The Behavior Analyst 24: 1–44.

Carr

Dunlap

Horner

. (2002) Positive behavior support: evaluation of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 4: 4–16.

Charles

Senter

(2004) Building Classroom Discipline (8th ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Chitiyo

Wheeler

(2009) Analyzing the treatment efficacy of a technical assistance model for providing behavioral consultation to schools. Preventing School Failure 53: 85–88. Available at: ERIC database (accessed 13 March 2010).

Dunlap

Carr

Horner

. (2008) Positive behavior support and applied behavior analysis: a familial alliance. Behavior Modification 32 (5): 682–698.

Gall

Borg

Gall

(2003) Quantitative and Qualitative Methods of Research in Psychology and Educational Science, Nasr

Arizi

Abolghasemi M Pakseresht

Kiamanesh

Bagheri

. (Trans.).). 1st ed. Tehran: Samt Publication.

Hardman

Drew

Egan

. (1990) Human Exceptionality. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

10.

Horner

Dunlap

Koegel

. (1990) Toward a technology of “non aversive” behavioral support. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 15(3): 125–132.

11.

Kappel

Dufresne

Mayer

(2012) From behavior management to positive behavioral support. Report, Department of Health and Human services, Administration on Developmental Disabilities.

12.

kord

(2003) The effect of feedback in developmental assessment in science course of fifth grade elementary school students. Master’s Thesis in Educational Psychology, University of AllamehTabatabaiee, Tehran, Iran.

13.

Lannie

McCurdy

(2007) Preventing disruptive behavior in the urban classroom: effects of the good behavior game on student and teacher behavior. Education and Treatment of Children 30: 85–98. Available at: Psyc iNFO database (accessed 11 March 2010)

14.

Lepper

Corpus

Iyengar

(2005) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology 97: 184–196.

15.

Laura

Peters

(2010) Reinforcement in the classroom improves student motivation and performance. Virginia Department of Education’s training and Technical Assistance Center, Virginia Common wealth University, Partnership for People with Disabilities, School of Education.

16.

Liberman

(2000) The token economy. American Journal of Psychiatry 13 (4): 57–59.

17.

Michigan Team Nutrition (2004) Alternatives to using food as a reward. Michigan Team Nutrition (a partnership between the Michigan Department of Education and Michigan State University Extension). Available at: http://www.tn.fcs.msue.edu/foodrewards.pdf (accessed 8 November 2004).

18.

Maccini

Gagnon

(2000) Best practices for teaching mathematics to secondary students with special needs. Focus on Exceptional Children 32: 1–22.

19.

Mathur

(1996) Why token reinforcement works. Teacher Mediator 2: 10–14.

20.

Miltenberger

(2008) Behavior Modification: Principles and Procedures. 4th ed. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

21.

Moore Partin

TCM

Robertson

Maggin

. (2010) Using teacher praise and opportunities to respond to promote appropriate student behavior. Preventing School Failure 54: 172–178. Available at: ERIC database (accessed 11 March 2010).

22.

Newcomer

(2009) Universal positive behavior support for the classroom. PBIS Newsletter 4(4). Available at: http://www.pbis.org/pbis_newsletter/volume_4/issue4.aspx (accessed 24 September 2009).

23.

Ormrod

(2000) Educational Psychology: Developing Learners. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

24.

Park

Lee

(2012) Modification of severe violent and aggressive behavior among psychiatric inpatients through the use of a short-term token economy. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 42 (7): 1062–1069.

25.

Porter

(2007) The impact of a School-Wide Token economy on behavior, attendance, and academics at Morgan High School. PhD dissertation, Marietta College.

26.

Reynolds

Zupanick

Dombeck

(2011) Effective teaching methods for people with intellectual disabilities. MentalHelp.net; 43–44. Available at: http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=10365&cn=208 (accessed 7 February 2012).

27.

Scheffe

(1954) Analysis of Variance. New York: Wily.

28.

Shahim

(1994) Standardization of Wechsler Intelligence Scale Revised for Children in Iran. Shiraz: Shiraz University publication.

29.

Simonsen

Fairbanks

Briesch

. (2008) Evidence-based practices in classroom management: considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children 31 (3): 351–380.

30.

Waggy

(2002) The effects of a token economy system in comparison to social praise on the manifest behaviors of elementary learning disabled students. Marshall University Graduate College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Education Specialist School Psychologist. Available on: marshall.edu

31.

Zecker

(2006) Underachievement and learning disabilities in children who are gifted. Available at: http://www.Ldaor.org/Newsletter-Fall2005.html (accessed 4 November 2006 )

32.

Zirpoli

(2005) Behavior Management: Applications for Teachers. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.