Valuing e-inclusion: Social media and the social networks of adolescents with intellectual disability

Abstract

Background:

Social media is a growing phenomenon, yet people with intellectual disability (ID) may not experience comparable access to this communication technology. Adolescents with ID may benefit from e-inclusion, especially as individuals with ID are at risk of having smaller social networks.

Materials and Methods:

The Social Network Guide was adapted to measure social media usage and used to examine the interpersonal relationships of adolescents with and without ID.

Results:

Adolescents with ID held smaller social networks with less developed informal relationships. However, friendship quality was comparable or superior to typically developing peers. Adolescents with ID interacted with a smaller percentage of contacts using social media. Social media use was predictive of the number of reported friendships and did not significantly predict critical comments.

Conclusions:

Findings suggest that adolescents with ID have comparable access to social media but use these sites to interact with a smaller number of social contacts.

Keywords

cyberbullying Facebook friendship social media social network

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alotaibi

(1997) Social network and social support of individuals with disabilities: A review of the literatures. Available at: http://dr-banderalotaibi.com/images/boho/e4.pdf (accessed 10 August 2013).

Bhardwaj

Forrester-Jones

Murphy

(2018) Social networks of adults with an intellectual disability from South Asian and White communities in the United Kingdom: a comparison. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 31(2): e253–e264. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12351.

Brown

(1999) Abuse of people with learning disabilities: layers of concern and analysis. In: Stanley

Manthorpe

Penhale

(eds.), Institutional Abuse: Perspectives Across the Life Course. London: Routledge, pp.89–110.

Caton

Chapman

(2016) The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: a systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 41(2): 125–139.

Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre. (2007). ThinkUKnow. Available at: https://www.thinkuknow.co.uk/Parentsold/quiz_answers/ (accessed 16 June 2013).

Cross

E-J

Richardson

Douglas

, et al. (2009) Virtual violence: Protecting children from cyberbullying. London: Beatbullying. Available at: http://www2.beatbullying.org/pdfs/Virtual%20Violence%20-%20Protecting%20Children%20from%20Cyberbullying.pdf (accessed 16 June 2013).

Department of Health (2001) Valuing People. A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century. White Paper. HMSO, London.

Department of Health (2007) Valuing People Now. From Progress to Transformation. London: Department of Health.

Desjarlais

Willoughby

(2010) A longitudinal study of the relation between adolescent boys and girls’ computer use with friends and friendship quality: support for the social compensation or the rich-get-richer hypothesis? Computers in Human Behavior 26: 896–905.

10.

Didden

Scholte

RHJ

Korziliua

, et al. (2009) Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 12: 146–151. DOI: 10.1080/17518420902971356.

11.

Dunbar

(2016) Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? Royal Society Open Science 3(1): 150292.

12.

Ellis

(2010) Be who you want to be: philosophy of Facebook and the construction of identity. Screen Education 58: 36–41. Available at: http://producer.csi.edu/cdraney/2013/102/resources/Ellis_BeWhoYouWant.pdf (accessed 1 September 2013).

13.

Emerson

McVilly

(2004) Friendship activities of adults with intellectual disabilities in supported accommodation in Northern England. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 17: 191–197.

14.

Facebook (2017) Company Info: Facebook Newsroom. Available at: http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/ (accessed 27 November 2017).

15.

Feng

Lazar

Kumin

, et al. (2008) Computer usage by young individuals with Down Syndrome: An exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, Assets ‘08, pp. 35–42. New York: ACM.

16.

Fisher

(2012) Parental perspectives on young adults with Down Syndrome and online social networking sites. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

17.

Forrester-Jones

Broadhurst

(2007) Autism and Loss. London: Jessica Kingsley.

18.

Forrester-Jones

Grant

(1997) Resettlement from Large Psychiatric Hospital to Small Community Residence. Aldershot: Avebury.

19.

Forrester-Jones

Carpenter

Coolen-Schrijner

, et al. (2006) The social networks of people with intellectual disability living in the community 12 years after resettlement from long-stay hospitals. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 19(4): 285–295.

20.

Forrester-Jones

Carpenter

Coolen-Schrijner

, et al. (2012) Good friends are hard to find? The social networks of people with mental illness 12 years after deinstitutionalisation. Journal of Mental Health 21(1): 4–14.

21.

Forrester-Jones

Dietzfelbinger

Stedman

, et al. (2018) Including the “spiritual” within mental health care in the UK, from the experiences of people with mental health problems. Journal of Religion and Health 57(1): 384–407. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-017-0502 -1.

22.

Forrester-Jones

Jones

Heason

, et al. (2004) Supported employment: a route to social networks. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 17: 199–208. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00199.x.

23.

Glanz

Rimer

Viswanath

(2008) Health Behaviour and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

24.

Guralnick

(1997) Peer social networks of young boys with developmental delays. American Journal on Mental Retardation 101(6): 595–612.

25.

Hartup

Stevens

(1999) Friendships and adaptation across the life span. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8(3): 76–79.

26.

Hill

Dunbar

RIM

(2003) Social network size in humans. Human Nature 14(1): 53–72.

27.

Holmes

O’Loughlin

(2014) The experience of people with learning disabilities on social networking sites. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. Early View. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12001/abstract (accessed 8 July 2013).

28.

Holt-Lunstad

Smith

Layton

(2010) Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine 7(7), e1000316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316..

29.

House

Landis

Umberson

(1988) Social relationships and health. Science 241(4865): 540–545. DOI: 10.1126/science.3399889.

30.

Kawachi

Berkman

(2001) Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health 78(3): 458–467. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.458.

31.

Kydland

Molka-Danielsen

Balandin

(2012) Examining the use of social media tool “Flickr” for impact on loneliness for people with intellectual disability. In: NOKOBIT 2012: Proceedings of the 2012 Norsk konferanse for organisasjoners bruk av informasjonsteknologi, Akademika forlag, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 253–264.

32.

Lenhart

Purcell

Smith

, et al. (2010) Social Media & Mobile Internet use Among Teens and Young Adults. Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://web.pewinternet.org/∼/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf (accessed 16 June 2013 ).

33.

Madden

Lenhart

Cortesi

, et al. (2013) Teens, Social Media, and Privacy. Washington: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teens-Social-Media-And-Privacy.aspx (accessed 16 June 2013).

34.

Margaryan

Littlejohn

Vojt

(2011) Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education 56: 429–440. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.

35.

Mayfield

(2008) What is Social Media? Available at: http://www.icrossing.co.uk/fileadmin/uploads/eBooks/What_is_Social_Media_iCrossing_ebook.pdf (accessed 16 June 2013 ).

36.

Mazurek

Shattuck

Wagner

, et al. (2012) Prevalence and correlates of screen-based media use among youths with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 42(8): 1757–1767.

37.

McVilly

Stancliffe

Parmenter

, et al. (2006) Adults with intellectual disabilities discuss loneliness. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 19: 191–203. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00261.x.

38.

Ofcom (2011) More Teenagers Say they would miss their Mobiles and the Internet than Watch TV. Available at: http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2011/10/25/more-teenagers-say-they-would-miss-their-mobiles-and-the-internet-than-watch-tv/ (accessed 9 July 2013).

39.

Park

Crocker

Mickelson

(2004) Attachment styles and contingencies of self-worth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(10): 1243–1254. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204264000.

40.

Raghavendra

Hutchinson

Grace

, et al. (2018) “I like talking to people on the computer”: Outcomes of a home-based intervention to develop social media skills in youth with disabilities living in rural communities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 76: 110–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.012.

41.

Reich

Subrahmanyam

Espinoza

(2012) Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: Overlap in adolescent’s online and offline social networks. Developmental Psychology 48(2): 356–368. DOI: 10.1037/a0026980.

42.

Robertson

Emerson

Gregory

, et al. (2001) Social networks of people with mental retardation in residential settings. Mental Retardation 39(3): 201–214.

43.

Sango

Forrester-Jones

(2017) Spirituality and social networks of people with intellectual and developmental disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability [Online] , 21(3): 280–295. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2017.1310820..

44.

Thelwell

(2008) Social networks, gender and friending: An analysis of MySpace member profiles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 1321–1330.

45.

Tracey

Abell

(1994) Social network map: assessing social support in clinical practice. Social network map: some further refinements on administration. Social Work Research 18: 56–60.

46.

Turkle

(1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

47.

Valkenburg

Peter

(2007) Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology 43: 267–277.

48.

Vallor

(2012) Flourishing on facebook: virtue friendship and the new social media. Ethics and Information Technology 4: 185–199.

49.

van Schalkwyk

Marin

Ortiz

, et al. (2017) Social media use, friendship quality, and the moderating role of anxiety in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47(9): 2805–2813.

50.

Webster

Carter

(2007) Social relationships and friendships of children with developmental disabilities: implications for inclusive settings. A systematic review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 32(3): 200–213.

51.

Wenz-Gross

Siperstein

(1997) Importance of social support in the adjustment of children with learning problems. Exceptional Children 63(2): 183–193.

52.

Wethington

Kessler

(1986) Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 27(1): 78–89.

53.

Wilson

(2003) Mentors: paving the transition from school to adulthood for students with disabilities. American Rehabilitation 27(1): 0–2.

54.

Young

(2008) The neurobiology of human social behaviour: an important but neglected topic. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 33(5): 391–392.

55.

Zhao

Qui

(2011) The potential of social media for students with disabilities. In: Gray

Silver-Pacuilla

(eds.), Breakthrough Teaching and Learning: How Educational and Assistive Technologies are Driving Innovation. New York: Springer, pp.71–86.