Euro-American forms of social organization are increasingly performed via ever more intricate computer systems and networks. Against this backdrop, the corrosive spectre of computer failure has assumed the role of the `network society's dreaded other, the harbinger of dis-organization and dis-order. At the close of the twentieth century anxiety over the probable effects and consequences of the so-called `Millennium Bug' provided a stark contrast to the then prevailing internet euphoria.This article suggests that the Bug, and the extensive (and costly) efforts that were dedicated to its extermination, provide us with a useful illustration of the ways in which IT applications have been used to think and enact particular, historically and culturally situated, notions of (human and technological) agency, organization, manageability and expertise.
Anderson, K.1999. Y2K for women: How to protect our home and family in the coming crisis. Bedford, TX: Sterling Press International.
2.
Ahmed, K., D. Parnas, B. Simons and T. Winograd.1999. Y2K and nuclear weapons - letters from four prominent scientists, www.cpsr.org/publications/newsletters/issues/1999/Winter/four.html (accessed November 11, 1999).
Bauman, Z.1991. Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge : Polity Press.
7.
Beck, U.1992. The risk society. London: SAGE.
8.
Bloomfield, B.1989. On speaking about computing. Sociology233: 409-26.
9.
Bloomfield, B. and T. Vurdubakis.1994. Re-presenting technology: IT consultancy reports as textual reality constructions. Sociology28(2): 455-77.
10.
Booker, C. and R. North.2007. Scared to death: Why scares are costing us the earth. Trowbridge: Cromwell Press.
11.
Business Wire.1997. Most U.S. financial companies have taken steps to address Millennium Bug (November 6), http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1997_Nov_6/ai_19957859 (accessed June 25, 2008).
12.
Castells, M.1996; 1997; 2000. The information age: Economy society and culture Vol I-III: Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
Ciborra, C.2002. The labyrinths of information. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
14.
Cooper G. and S. Woolgar.1994. Software quality as community performance . In Information, control and technical change, ed. R. Mansell, 54-68. London: Aslib.
15.
Cooper, R.1986. Organization/Disorganization. Social Science Information25(2): 299-335.
16.
De Jager, P. 1993. Doomsday 2000. ComputerWorld (September 3), www.year2000.com/archive/cw-article.html (accessed November 9, 1999).
17.
De Jager, P. 1996. Unjustified optimism: Peter De Jager's testimony to the House of Representatives, www.year2000.com/archive/testimony.html (accessed November 9, 1999).
18.
De Jager, P. 2000. The question of Italy: An analysis, www.year2000.com/archive/italy.html (accessed March 23, 2001).
19.
Delio, M.2001. DotCom Guy, gone and forgotten, Wired (March 1), www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,40940,00.html (accessed April 7, 2005).
20.
Derrida, J.1981. Plato's pharmacy. In Dissemination, trans. B. Johnson, 63-171. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
21.
Douglas, M.1966. Purity and danger. London: Routledge.
22.
Douglas, M.1992. Risk and blame. London: Routledge.
23.
Douglas, M. and B. Isherwood.1980. The world of goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption. HarmondswothPenguin.
24.
Durkheim, E.1997[orig. 1912]. The elementary forms of the religious life . Trans. K. Fields. New York: Free Press.
25.
The Economist.1997. Please panic early. October 4: 25-8.
26.
Eirich, K. and N. Eirich.1998. How to survive Y2K chaos in the city . Holyrood, NL: InfoAge Consulting .
27.
Festinger, L., H. Riecken, and S. Schlachter.1964. When prophecy fails. New York: Harper.
28.
Forster, E.M.1977 [orig. 1909]. The machine stops. In Collected short stories. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
29.
Grande, C.2000. Lessons for business in measures against the millennium bug. Financial times, April 19: 6.
30.
Grossman, W.1998. A diet of worms for when it all falls apart. Connected, August 20: 8-9.
31.
The Guardian1997. Can't do January 2000… too busy, I've not got a single window, March 6.
32.
Guenier, R.2000. Y2K - what really happened, www.year2000.com/y2kcurrent2.htm (accessed March 23, 2003).
33.
Gutteling J. and M. Kuttschreuter .2002The role of expertise in risk communication: laypeople's and expert's perception of the millennium bug risk . The Journal of Risk Research5(1): 35-47.
34.
Jones, C.1998. The year 2000 software problem: Quantifying the costs and assessing the consequences. New York: Addison Wesley.
35.
Knights, D., F. Noble, T. Vurdubakis, and H. Willmott.2002. Allegories of creative destruction: technology and organisation in narratives of the e-Economy'. In Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality, ed. S. Woolgar, 99-114. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
36.
Knights, D., F. Noble, T. Vurdubakis, and H. Willmott.2007`Electronic cash and the virtual marketplace: Reflections on a revolution postponed', Organization14(6): 747-68.
37.
Kumar, K. and Van Hillegersberg, J.2000. ERP experiences and revolution . Communications of the ACM43(4): 23-6.
Leslie, J.1999. Powerless: What happens at 00:00:01 on January 1? Try deadly, black, and very, very cold. Wired (April 7), http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/7.04/blackout.html (accessed June 25, 2008).
40.
Levi-Strauss, C.1962. Totemism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Manion, M. and Evan, W.2000. The Y2K problem and professional responsibility: A retrospective analysis. Technology in Society22: 361-87.
42.
Modernising Government in Action (2000) April. London: The Stationery Office.
43.
Munn, N.1986. The fame of Gawa. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
44.
Pauchant T. and I. Mitroff1992. Management by nosing around; Exposing the dangerous invisibility of technologies. Journal of Management Inquiry11: 70-8.
45.
Perez, D.1998. Nuclear war and the Millennium Bug, www.terminator3armageddon.com/conspira/nukey2k.html (November 9, 1999).
46.
Pfaffenberger B.1992. Technological dramas. Science Technology and Human Values17(3): 282-312.
47.
Philimore, J. and A. Davinson2002. A precautionary tale. Futures34(2): 147-57.
48.
Pinch, T.1993. Testing, one, two, three - testing: Towards a sociology of testing. Science, Technology & Human Values18: 25-41.
49.
Quigley, K.2004. The Emperor's new computers. Public Administration82: 4.
50.
Quigley, K.2005. Bug reactions: Considering US government and UK government Y2K operations in light of media coverage and public opinion polls. Health, Risk & Society7(3): 267-91.
51.
Ritzer, G.2000. The McDonaldization of society: an investigation into the changing character of contemporary social life. London : SAGE.
52.
Stein, J.2000. Hey, you in that bunker, you can come out now! Time, January 1: 54.
53.
Stiglitz, J.2003. The roaring nineties: A new history of the world `s most prosperous decade. New York: W.W. Norton.
54.
Taylor, C.1999. The history and the hype. Time, January 18: 50-1.
55.
Thompson, J.D.1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill.
56.
U.S. Naval War College.1999. Y2K scenario - dynamics workshop. VII Brainstorming Session, January 13-15, . at the Pell Center, Salve Regina University, Newport RI, USA.
57.
Weiss Ratings. 2000. http://www.weissratings.com/inthenew.htm (accessed February 21, 2000).
58.
Yourdon, E. and Yourdon, J.1997. Time bomb 2000! What the year 2000 computer crisis means to you!New York: Prentice Hall .
59.
Zerega, B.1998. Lawsuit could set crucial year-2000 precedent, (September 14), http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9809/14/lawsuit-Y2K.idg/ (accessed March 23, 2001).
