Sometimes an historical approach can help in understanding a vexing question like why artists seemingly had a lot to say about US workers' experience during the Depression era (1930—41) but management thinkers and business leaders did not. Searching for an answer prompted this investigation into the need for an organizational-arts perspective. Collected images from movies, the visual arts, and dramas revealed insights into the human condition at work whereas a review of the thinking of management scholars and practitioners at the time showed little attention to workers' perceptions or feelings.These findings support the value of an organizational studies approach that takes history seriously, and recognizes that an arts and organizational aesthetics perspectives can provide primary knowledge.
Altenbaugh, R.J.1982. Proletarian drama: An educational tool of the American labor college movement. Theatre Journal34(2): 197-210.
2.
Austin, R., and L. Devin.2003. Artful making: What managers need to know about how artists work. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Barley, S.R., and G. Kunda.1992. Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly37(3): 363-399.
4.
Barnard, C.I.1938/1953. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Barrow, C.W.1991. Playing workers: Proletarian drama in the curriculum of American labor colleges, 1921-1937. Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society20(4): 5-29.
6.
Beatty, J.2001. Colossus: How the corporation changed America. New York: Broadway Books.
7.
Berger, J.1972. Ways of seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books.
8.
Bergman, A.1972. We're in the money: Depression America and its films. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
9.
Blackford, M.G., and K.A. Kerr.1994. Business enterprise in American history , 3rd edn. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
10.
Boje, D.M.1991. The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly36(1): 106-126.
11.
Boorstin, D.J.1961. The image: Or what happened to the American dream. New York: Atheneum.
12.
Bowers, G.A., L.M. Gilbreth, M. van Kleeck, H.S. Person, W.V. Bingham, C.R. Mann, W.J. Donald, E.K. Donald, and F.C. Thorne.1928. American report to the I.R.I: Development of fundamental relationships with industry in the United States. Personnel Journal7(4): 257-268.
13.
Brown, L.1979. Federal theatre: Melodrama, social protest, and genius . Quarterly Journal of the Library of Congress36(1): 18-37.
14.
Burrell, G., and G. Morgan.1979. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.
15.
Carr, A., and P. Hancock , eds. 2003. Art and aesthetics at work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
Chandler, A.D. Jr.1977. The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Cox, T.1980. Repetitive work. In Current concerns in occupational stress, ed. C.L. Cooper and R. Payne, 23-41. New York: Wiley.
18.
Dabakis, M.1999. Visualizing labor in American sculpture: Monuments, manliness, and the work ethic, 1880-1935. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
DePree, M.1992. Leadership jazz. New York: Dell.
20.
Dobson, J.1999. The art of management and the aesthetic manager: The coming way of business. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
21.
Doherty, E.M.2006. Viewing work historically through art: Incorporating the visual arts into organizational studies. Journal of Management History12(2): 137-153.
22.
Doss, E.1997. Toward an iconography of American labor: work, workers and the work ethic in American art, 1930-1945. Design Issues13(1): 53-66.
23.
Doss, E.1998. Images of American women in the 1930s: Reginald Marsh and Paramount Pictures. In Critical issues in American art: A book of readings, ed. M. Calo, 295-301. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
24.
Doss, E.2002. Twentieth-century American art. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
25.
Dunham, L., and R.E. Freeman.2000. There is business like show business: Leadership lessons from the theater. Organizational Dynamics29(2): 108-122.
26.
Dutton, J.E., J.M. Dukerich, and C.V. Harquail.1994. Organizational images and member identification . Administrative Science Quarterly39(2): 239-263.
27.
Elson, R.T.1968. Time Inc.: The intimate history of a publishing enterprise 1923-1941. New York: Atheneum.
28.
Freedman, R.1994. Kids at work: Lewis Hine and the crusade against child labor. New York: Clarion.
29.
Freeman, R.E.1994. Epilogue. In Business as a humanity, ed. T.J. Donaldson and R.E. Freeman, 215-225. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Gagliardi, P.1996. Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In Handbook of organization studies, ed. S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W.R. Nord, 565-580. London: SAGE.
31.
Gagliardi, P.2006. A role for humanities in the formation of managers. In Management education and humanities, ed. P. Gagliardi and B. Czarniawska, 3-9. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
32.
Gantt, H.L.1908. Training workmen in habits of industry and cooperation . In Classics in management, ed. H.F. Merrill, 136-150. New York: American Management Association.
33.
Gilbreth, L.M.1914. The psychology of management: The function of the mind in determining, teaching and installing methods of least waste. New York: Sturgis & Walton.
34.
Gilbreth, L.M., M. Van Kleeck, and G.A. Bowers.1928. Summary of report. In G.A. Bowers, L.M. Gilbreth , M. Van Kleeck, H.S. Person, W.V. Bingham, C.R. Mann, W.J. Donald , E. King, D. Thorne and F.C. Thorne, American report to the I.R.I: Development of fundamental relationships within industry in the United States. Personnel Journal7(4): 257-268.
35.
Gioia, D.A., M. Schultz and K.G. Corley.2000. Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review25(1): 63-81.
36.
Goffman, E.1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
37.
Grunig, J.E.1993. Image and substance: From symbolic to behavioral relationships . Public Relations Review19(2): 121-139.
38.
Human Relations. 2002. Special issue on Organizing Aesthetics, 55(7): 755-885.
39.
Jacoby, S.M.1985. Employing bureaucracy: Managers, unions, and the transformation of work in American industry, 1900-1945. New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
Jessup, J.K.1952. A political role for the corporation. In The responsible businessman: Business and society readings from Fortune (1966), ed. J.A. Larson, 195-206. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
41.
Kornhauser, A.W.1933. The technique of measuring employee attitudes. Personnel9: 99-107.
42.
Krippendorff, K.2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
43.
Linstead, S. and H. Hopfl.2000. The aesthetics of organization. London. SAGE.
44.
McElvaine, R.S.1984. The great depression: America, 1929-1941. New York: Times Books.
45.
Melosh, B.1991. Engendering culture: Manhood and womanhood in New Deal public art and theater. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
46.
Melosh, B.1993. Manly work: public art and masculinity in Depression America . In Gender and American history since 1890, ed. B. Melosh, 155-181. London: Routledge.
47.
Merrill, H.F.1960. Classics in management. New York: American Management Association.
48.
Morgan, G.1993. Imaginization: The art of creative management. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Morgan, G., P.J. Frost, and L.R. Pondy.1983. Organizational symbolism. In Organizational symbolism, ed. L.R. Pondy , P.J. Frost, G. Morgan and T.C. Dandridge , 3-35. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
51.
Nissley, N.2002. Tuning-in to organizational song as aesthetic discourse . Culture and Organization8(1): 51-68.
52.
Nyland, C.1998. Taylorism and the mutual-gains strategy. Industrial Relations37(4): 519-541.
53.
Organization. 1996. Special issue on Organization and Aesthetics, 3(2).
54.
Park, M., and G.E. Markowitz.1984. Democratic vistas: Post offices and public art in the New Deal. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
55.
Peary, D.1986. Guide for the film fanatic. New York : Simon & Schuster.
56.
Pink, S.2007. Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research, 2nd edn. London : SAGE.
57.
Pohl, F.K.2002a. Framing America: A social history of American art. New York: Thames & Hudson.
58.
Pohl, F.K.2002b. Working in America: Images of labor, 1930-1950, exhibition notes. Claremont, CA: Pomona College Museum of Art.
59.
Pondy, L.R.1983. The role of metaphors and myths in organization and in the facilitation of change. In Organizational symbolism, ed. L.R. Pondy, P.J. Frost, G. Morgan and T.C. Dandridge, 157-166. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
60.
Prosser, J., ed. 1998. Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London : Falmer Press.
61.
Reilly, B.F. Jr.1995. Emblems of production: workers in German, Italian, and American art during the 1930s. In Designing modernity: The arts of reform and persuasion 1885-1945, 287-313, W. Kaplan.New York: Thames and Hudson.
62.
Roethlisberger, F.J. (1941/1959). Management and morale. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
Roethlisberger, F.J., and W.J. Dickson.1939. Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
Sandelands, L.E.1998. Feeling and form in social life. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
65.
Sandelands, L.E., and G.C. Buckner.1989. Of art and work: Aesthetic experience and the psychology of work feelings. In Research in organizational behavior, volume 11, ed. L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw, 105-131, Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
66.
Sinclair, U.1906. The jungle. New York: Doubleday.
67.
Spector, B.2008. The man in the gray flannel suit in the executive suite: American corporate movies in the 1950s. Journal of Management History14(8): 87-104.
68.
Stagner, R.1975. Boredom on the assembly line: age and personality variables . Industrial Gerontology2(1): 23-44.
69.
Strati, A.1992. Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of Management Review17(3): 568-581.
70.
Strati, A.1996. Organizations viewed through the lens of aesthetics. Organization3(2): 209-218.
71.
Strati, A.1999. Organization and aesthetics. London : SAGE.
72.
Strati, A., and P. Guillet de Montoux .2002. Introduction: Organizing aesthetics. Human Relations55(7): 755-766.
73.
Taylor, F.W.1911, 1939, 1947. Scientific management. Comprising `Shop management', `The principles of scientific management', and `Testimony before the special house committee', with a forward by H.S. Person . New York: Harper & Brothers .
74.
Taylor, F.W.1916. The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
75.
Taylor, S.S., and H. Hansen.2005. Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1211-1231.
76.
Terkel, S.1972. Working. New York: Ballantine Books.
77.
Turner, A.N.1955. Management and the assembly line. Harvard Business Review33(5): 40-48.
78.
Van Kleeck, M.1925. Sharing management with the workers. The Journal of Social Forces3(3): 506-510.
79.
Walker, C.R.1950. The problem of the repetitive job. Harvard Business Review28(3): 54-58.
80.
Walker, C.R., and R.H. Guest.1952.The man on the assembly line. Harvard Business Review30(3): 71-83.
81.
Weick, K.E.1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
82.
Wren, D.A.2005. The history of management thought, 5th edn. New York: Wiley.
83.
Zald, M.N.1993. Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise: Toward a reconceptualization of the foundations of the field. Organization Science4(4): 513-528.
84.
Zald, M.N.1996. More fragmentation?: Unfinished business in linking the social sciences and the humanities. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 251-261.
85.
Zald, M.N.2002. Spinning disciplines: Critical management studies in the context of the transformation of management education. Organization9(3): 365-385.
