This study contributes to comparative and international education research by validating a culturally adapted Teachers’ Attitudes towards Inclusive Education (TATIE) scale in Iraqi Kurdistan and conducting a rigorous comparative evaluation of pre-service teachers. Addressing methodological challenges in cross-cultural studies, the research analyzes data from 500 pre-service teachers using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Beyond establishing the reliability and construct validity of the adapted scale, the study integrates Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) and ANOVA to conduct a comparative analysis of demographic subgroups. The results reveal significant disparities in both measurement invariance and latent mean scores; specifically, participants with prior training and familiarity with inclusive practices demonstrated markedly higher self-efficacy and more favorable attitudes compared to their untrained and unfamiliar peers. Furthermore, significant variations were observed across gender and age groups. These empirically grounded insights offer valuable guidance for tailoring teacher education curricula in diverse cultural settings, contributing to the broader global discourse on equitable pedagogies.
AlborzASleeRMilesS (2013) Establishing the foundations for an inclusive education system in Iraq: reflection on findings from a nationwide survey. International Journal of Inclusive Education17(9): 965–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.725776
5.
AldosariMS (2024) Psychometric properties of principals’ attitudes toward inclusive education (PATIE) scale: Arabic version. BMC Psychology12: 22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01524-z
6.
AlMahdiOBukamalH (2019) Pre-Service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education during their studies in Bahrain teachers college. Sage Open9(3): 2158244019865772. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019865772
7.
AlnahdiGHHuiSKF (2019) The Arabic version of the teacher efficacy for inclusive practices (TEIP-AR) scale: a construct validity study. Cogent Education6(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1618516
8.
AlsolamiAVaughanM (2023) Teacher attitudes toward inclusion of students with disabilities in Jeddah elementary schools. PLoS One18(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279068
AvramidisEBaylissPBurdenR (2000) Student teachers' attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school. Teaching and Teacher Education16(3): 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00062-1
11.
BanduraA (1977) Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.
12.
BanduraA (1978) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy1(4): 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
13.
BartelsFVierbuchenMC (2022) Teacher training in Iraq—approaches, challenges, and potentials in building an inclusive education system. In: Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Springer, 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2400-2_21
14.
BartelsFVierbuchenM-CThiesS, et al. (2020) Improving inclusive (teacher) education in Iraq – a multiplier system approach in teacher training to enhance inclusive education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice20(7): 17–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v20i7.3149
15.
BeatonDEBombardierCGuilleminF, et al. (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine25(24): 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
16.
BeltranJ, ECagapeWKristineM, et al. (2022) Teachers’ attitude towards inclusive education. International Journal of Radiation Physics116(1): 134–150. https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001161120234412
17.
BentleyMFleurySCGarrisonJ (2007) Critical constructivism for teaching and learning in a democratic society. Journal of Thought42(3–4): 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/jthought.42.3-4.9
18.
BoyleCAndersonJPageA, et al. (2020) Inclusive education: global issues and controversies. Inclusive Education: Global Issues and Controversies, July. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004431171
19.
BoyleCBarrellCAllenK-A, et al. (2023) Primary and secondary pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. Heliyon9(11): e22328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22328
20.
ByrneBM (2016) Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 3rd ed.. New York: Routledge.
CharitakiGKourtiIGregoryJL, et al. (2022) Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: a cross-national exploration. Trends in Psychology, November32: 1120–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00240-0
DamriDIndraRTsaputraA, et al. (2023) Leadership evaluation and effective learning in an inclusive high school in padang, Indonesia. Cogent Education10(2): 2282807. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2282807
25.
DieckmannNFJohnsonBB (2019) Why do scientists disagree? Explaining and improving measures of the perceived causes of scientific disputes. PLoS One14(2): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211269
26.
DignathCRimm-KaufmanSvan EwijkR, et al. (2022) Teachers’ beliefs about inclusive education and insights on what contributes to those beliefs: a meta-analytical study. Educational Psychology Review34: 2609–2660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09695-0
27.
DrivsholmTEplovLFDavidsenM, et al. (2006) Representativeness in population-based studies: a detailed description of non-response in a Danish cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health34(6): 623–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/14034940600607616
28.
EaglyAChaikenS (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
29.
EdiyantoAKawaiN (2023) The measurement of teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education: an empirical study in East java, Indonesia. Cogent Education10(2): 2229014. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2229014
30.
EdiyantoEKawaiN (2025) Development of the scale to measure Indonesian teachers’ attitudes towards students with special needs in an inclusive education setting. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education40(1): 171–192. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2025.40.1.9
31.
EdiyantoEKawaiNHayashidaM, et al. (2021) Indonesian teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education12(2): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2021-0014
32.
EretE (2022) The review of international and national efforts to foster inclusive education: implications for preservice teacher education. Turkish Journal of Special Education Research and Practice4(2022-V4-I2): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.37233/trsped.2022.0132
33.
Fernández-PorteroI (2022) Measuring preservice foreign language teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education through a newly developed scale. Foreign Language Annals55(4): 1188–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12660
34.
ForlinCEarleCLoremanT, et al. (2011) The sentiments, attitudes, and concerns about inclusive education revised (SACIE-R) scale for measuring pre-service teachers’ perceptions about inclusion. Exceptionality Education International21(3): 50–65. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v21i3.7682
35.
FornellCChaJ (1994) Partial Least Squares. Advanced Methods of Marketing Research407: 52–78.
36.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research18: 382–388. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
37.
GalaterouJAntoniouAS (2017) Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: the role of job stressors and demographic parameters. International Journal of Special Education32(4): 643–658.
38.
GeorgeDMalleryP (2003) SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update (4Th Ed.). Boston. Allyn and Bacon.
39.
GoddardCEvansD (2018) Primary pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion across the training years. Australian Journal of Teacher Education43(6): 122–142. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n6.8
40.
GregoryJLNotoL (2012) Technical Manual for Attitudes Towards Teaching all Students (ATTAS-mm) Instrument. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED537530
41.
HairJFHultGTMRingleCM, et al. (2017) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd edition. Sage Publications Inc.
42.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtM, et al. (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review31: 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
43.
HairJ, JFHultGTMRingleCM, et al. (2021) An introduction to structural equation modeling. In: HairJrJFHultGTMRingleCMSarstedtMDanksNPRayS (eds) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1
44.
HassaneinEEAAlshaboulYMIbrahimS (2021) The impact of teacher preparation on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education in Qatar. Heliyon7(9): e07925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07925
45.
HenselerJRingleCMSinkovicsRR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing20(1): 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
46.
JuryMPerrinALRohmerO, et al. (2021) Attitudes toward inclusive education: an exploration of the interaction between Teachers’ Status and Students’ type of disability within the French context. Frontiers in Education6(May): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.655356
47.
KazmiABKamranMSiddiquiS (2023) The effect of teacher’s attitudes in supporting inclusive education by catering to diverse learners. Frontiers in Education8(April): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1083963
48.
KhineMS (2022) Handbook of research on teacher education: pedagogical innovations and practices in the Middle East. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2400-2
49.
KockN (2015) Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration11(4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
50.
KolbDA (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
51.
KoliqiDKoliqiKZabeliN (2023) Pre-service teachers’ attitudes and the factors influencing their formation regarding inclusive education in Kosovo. British Journal of Special Education50(3): 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12463
52.
LatkinCAEdwardsCDavey-RothwellMA, et al. (2017) The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addictive Behaviors73: 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.005
53.
LautenbachFHeyderA (2019) Changing attitudes to inclusion in preservice teacher education: a systematic review. Educational Research61(2): 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1596035
54.
LeshowitzBJenkensKHeatonS, et al. (1993) Fostering critical thinking skills in students with learning disabilities: an instructional program. Journal of Learning Disabilities26(7): 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949302600707
55.
LindnerK-TAlnahdiGHWahlSSchwabS (2019) Perceived Differentiation and Personalization Teaching Approaches in Inclusive Classrooms: Perspectives of Students and Teachers. Frontiers in Education4: 58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00058
56.
LindnerKTSchwabSEmaraM, et al. (2023) Do teachers favor the inclusion of all students? A systematic review of primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education38(6): 766–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2172894
57.
LlorentVJNúñez-FloresMKaakinenM (2024) Inclusive education by teachers to the development of the social and emotional competencies of their students in secondary education. Learning and Instruction91: 101892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101892
58.
LoremanTSharmaUForlinC (2013) Do Pre-service Teachers Feel Ready to Teach in Inclusive Classrooms? A Four Country Study of Teaching Self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education38(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n1.10
59.
LoveJSelkerRMarsmanM, et al. (2019) JASP: graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. Journal of Statistical Software88(1): 1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v088.i02
60.
MahatM (2008) The development of a psychometrically-sound instrument to measure teachers’ multidimensional attitudes toward inclusive education. International Journal of Special Education23(1): 82–92.
61.
MalinenO-PSavolainenHEngelbrechtPXuJNelMNelNTlaleD (2013) Exploring teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices in three diverse countries. Teaching and Teacher Education33: 34–44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.004
62.
MansourN (2009) Science teachers’ beliefs and practices-issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education4(1): 25–48. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ884384.pdf
McCallMW, J (1986) Book review: leadership and performance beyond expectations, by bernard M. Bass. Human Resource Management25(3): 481–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811401979
MilfontTLFischerR (2010) Testing Measurement Invariance across Groups: Applications in Cross-Cultural Research. International Journal of Psychological Research3: 111–130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857
67.
Mohamed EmamMAl-MahdyYFH (2020) Teachers’ efficacy for inclusive practices in the sultanate of Oman: effect of gender and teaching experience. School Psychology International41(2): 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319895062
68.
Mohammed AliABVierbuchenMC (2023) Quality of inclusive primary schools in duhok governorate, Kurdistan region of Iraq: an observation study. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism23(3): 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.12406
69.
MonsenJJEwingDLBoyleJ (2015) Psychometric properties of the revised teachers’ attitude toward inclusion scale. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology3(1): 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2014.938383
70.
MuhammadAE (2020a) Critical thinking as a dimension of constructivist learning in social studies education: a study of teachers’ attitudes in secondary education. Journal of Studies in Education10(2): 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v10i2.16763
MuhammadAE (2023) Social constructivist approach: opinions of history teachers at intermediate secondary schools. European Journal of Educational Research12(4): 1667–1681. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1423
73.
MuhammadAE (2026) Preservice teachers as curriculum creators: promoting inclusive education for all learners. Journal of Curriculum Studies1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2026.2680407
74.
MuhammadAELiuY (2025a) Enhancing inclusivity in primary schools: the role of constructivist teacher education in addressing cultural diversity. Education3-13: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2025.2475969
75.
MuhammadAELiuY (2025b) Effect of teacher education initiatives in shaping preservice teachers’ perceptions of and self-efficacy in implementing inclusive education. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education4: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2025.10006
76.
NieYLauSLiauAK (2012) The teacher efficacy scale: a reliability and validity study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher21(2): 414–421.
77.
RappACCorral-GranadosA (2021) Understanding inclusive education – a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education0(0): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725
78.
SaloviitaT (2015) Measuring pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: psychometric properties of the TAIS scale. Teaching and Teacher Education52: 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.09.003
79.
SharmaUForlinCLoremanT (2008) Impact of training on pre-service teachers’ attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and sentiments about persons with disabilities. Disability & Society23(7): 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802469271
80.
SharmaULoremanTForlinC (2012) Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs12(1): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x
SoodakLCPodellDMLehmanLR (1998) Teacher, student, and school attributes as predictors of teachers’ responses to inclusion. The Journal of Special Education31(4): 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699803100405
84.
SousaVDRojjanasriratW (2011) Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice17(2): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
85.
StevensonNAVanLoneJBarberBR (2020) A commentary on the misalignment of teacher education and the need for classroom behavior management skills. Education & Treatment of Children43(4): 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-020-00031-1
86.
StoiberKCGettingerMGoetzD (1998) Exploring factors influencing parents’ and early childhood practitioners’ beliefs about inclusion. Early Childhood Research Quarterly13(1): 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80028-3
87.
TaberKS (2018) The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education48(6): 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
88.
TsaiCC (2002) Nested epistemologies: science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education24(8): 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049132
89.
VygotskyLS (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.
90.
WahabAA (2017) Education in Kurdistan Region at the Intersection of Nationalism and Democracy (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Toronto. https://hdl.handle.net/1807/79528
91.
WalkerN (2021) Practical pedagogy to better prepare preservice teachers for inclusive teaching: attitudes, knowledge and skills. International Journal of Whole Schooling17(1): 131–167.
WeiselADrorO (2006) School climate, sense of efficacy and Israeli teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion of students with special needs. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice1(2): 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197906064677
94.
WoolleySLBenjaminWJJWoolleyAW (2004) Construct validity of a self-report measure of teacher beliefs related to constructive and traditional approaches to teaching and learning. Educational and Psychological Measurement64(2): 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403261189
95.
YadaATolvanenASavolainenH (2018) Teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy on implementing inclusive education in Japan and Finland: a comparative study using multi-group structural equation modelling. Teaching and Teacher Education75: 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.011
96.
YadaALeskinenMSavolainenH, et al. (2022) Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education109: 103521, Article 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103521
97.
YuSYChoE (2022) Preservice teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion in early childhood classrooms: a review of the literature. Early Childhood Education Journal50(4): 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01187-0
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
