`Yeah Looks Like It N'All . . .': The `Live Action' Universe and Abridged Figurative Design and Computer Animation within Modern Toss

Abstract

This article will discuss formal aspects of the Channel Four TV show Modern Toss. Through a minimalism in image and dialogue it looks at how a range of characters negotiate miniature social rebellions. What is of interest here is the highly distinctive approach to animation form that utilizes deliberately abstracted figurative designs framed in collusion with previously filmed backgrounds and actors. This specific approach of placing Flash computer figures within an agreed universe accesses, firstly, a sense of `distance' that is pertinent to the show's humorous register. Secondly, this complements the fatalism inherent within the narratives themselves and then, lastly, this process allies the show to the original graphic/web cartoon sources in service of a signature aesthetic endemic to this concept.

Keywords

Channel Four hybridity Joe Link Mick Bunnage Modern Toss TV animation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrier, M. (1999) Hollywood Cartoons. New York : Oxford University Press

Bazin, A. (1973) What Is Cinema? Essays Selected and Translated by Hugh Gray. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press

Beynon, J. (2002) Masculinities and Culture. Philadelphia /Buckingham: Open University Press.

Carrier, D. (2000) The Aesthetics of Comics. Philadelphia : Pennsylvania State University Press

Crafton, D. (1993) Before Mickey - The Animated Film 1898-1928. Chicago /London: University of Chicago Press.

Freud, S. (1973) Introductory Lectures to Psychoanalysis: Pelican Freud Library - Vol. 1, eds J. Strachey and A. Richards. London / New York: Penguin

Furniss, M. (1998) Art in Motion - Animation Aesthetics. London: John Libbey.

Gifford, D. (1987) British Animated Films, 1895-1985: A Filmography . Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.

Gombrich, E.H. (1968) Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, 3rd edn. London: Phaidon Press

10.

Hilf, W.H. (Fall 1996) `Developing a Digital Aesthetic' , Animation Journal 5(1): 4-31.

11.

Katz, J. (1988) The Seduction of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions of Doing Evil. New York: Basic Books

12.

Klein, N. (1993) Seven Minutes - The Life and Death of the American Cartoon. London /New York: Verso

13.

Lewell, J. (1982) `The Art of Chuck Jones' , Films and Filming 336 (September): 12-20.

14.

Link, J. (2006) E-mail correspondence with author, 19 November.

15.

McCall, D.L. (1998) Film Cartoons - A Guide to 20th Century American Animated Features and Shorts. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.

16.

Modern Toss Official Website (2006) Retrieved 27August 2006: http://www.moderntoss.com/

17.

Mortimer, T. (2007) E-mail correspondence with author, 9 January.

18.

Thorburn, D. and Jenkins, H. (eds) (2004) Rethinking Media Change - The Aesthetics of Transition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

19.

Wells, P. (1998) Understanding Animation. London : Routledge.

20.

Wells, P. (2002) Animation - Genre and Authorship. London: Wallflower.

21.

Wells, P. (2003a) `Case Study 4: Recalling and Revising Animation Tradition - The Ren and Stimpy Show', in J. Nelmes (ed.) An Introduction to Film Studies, pp. 226-7. London: Routledge.

22.

Wells, P. (2003b) `Smarter Than the Average Art Form', in C.A. Stabile and M. Harrison (eds) Prime Time Animation - Television Animation and American Culture, pp. 15-32. London /New York: Routledge.

23.

Wheatley, B. (2006) E-mail correspondence with author, 10 December.