Do Visual Details Drive Memory? Role of the Visuo-Spatial Frequencies in Mnemonic Discrimination

Abstract

Memory is a dynamic reconstruction process, emphasizing the importance of assessing not only that an event occurred but also its details (i.e., memory accuracy). Recent studies have suggested that reconstructing accurate memories requires discriminating overlapping memory traces, a process known as pattern separation (PS). PS is typically studied through tasks involving the discrimination of visual lures, highlighting the contribution of visual processes to PS. Two main types of visual processing should be considered (high spatial frequencies [HSF]; and low spatial frequencies [LSF]), and it remains unclear whether these processes contribute equally to the discrimination of visual lures. This preregistered study examined the impact of spatial frequencies on mnemonic discrimination using a mnemonic similarity task. We hypothesized that HSF, which process the fine analysis of information, would be more involved than LSF, which process the coarse analysis of information, in discriminating targets from similar lures. Forty young participants had to recognize visual stimuli under three spatial frequency conditions: LSF images, HSF images, and a no-filter (NF) condition. The results showed that the lure discrimination index was lower for the LSF images than for the NF condition. LSF images also resulted in fewer false recognitions of lures and more target misses compared to HSF images and the NF condition. These results suggest that HSF support mnemonic discrimination more than LSF but also contribute more broadly to the overall richness of memory traces. This study contributes to theoretical models of memory by highlighting the importance of rich visual information for accurate memory.

Keywords

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Addis

D. R.

Pan

Musicaro

Schacter

D. L.

(2016). Divergent thinking and constructing episodic simulations. Memory, 24(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2014.985591

Amer

Davachi

(2023). Extra-hippocampal contributions to pattern separation. eLife, 12, e82250. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82250

Ashtiani

M. N.

Kheradpisheh

S. R.

Masquelier

Ganjtabesh

(2017). Object categorization in finer levels relies more on higher spatial frequencies and takes longer. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01261

Avberšek

L. K.

Zeman

de Beeck

H. O.

(2021). Training for object recognition with increasing spatial frequency: A comparison of deep learning with human vision. Journal of Vision, 21(10), 14. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.10.14

Bar

(2003). A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(4), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903321662976

Barense

M. D.

Bussey

T. J.

Lee

A. C. H.

Rogers

T. T.

Davies

R. R.

Saksida

L. M.

Murray

E. A

Graham

K. S.

(2005). Functional specialization in the human medial temporal lobe. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(44), 10239–10246. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2704-05.2005

Barense

M. D.

Groen

I. I. A.

Lee

A. C. H.

Yeung

L.-K.

Brady

S. M.

Gregori

Kapur

Bussey

T. J.

Saksida

L. M.

Henson

R. N. A.

(2012). Intact memory for irrelevant information impairs perception in amnesia. Neuron, 75(1), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.014

Barense

M. D.

Henson

R. N.

Graham

K. S.

(2011). Perception and conception: Temporal lobe activity during complex discriminations of familiar and novel faces and objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3052–3067. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21625

Barense

M. D.

Henson

R. N. A.

Lee

A. C. H.

Graham

K. S.

(2010). Medial temporal lobe activity during complex discrimination of faces, objects, and scenes: Effects of viewpoint. Hippocampus, 20(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20641

10.

Bartnik

C. G.

Groen

I. I. A

. (2023, November 22). Visual perception in the human brain: How the brain perceives and understands real-world scenes. In Sherman

S. M

. (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.013.437

11.

Bastin

Delhaye

(2023). Targeting the function of the transentorhinal cortex to identify early cognitive markers of Alzheimer’s disease. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 23(4), 986–996. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-023-01093-5

12.

Boucart

Lenoble

Peyrin

(2025). Age difference on the spatial scale of object categorization. Experimental Aging Research, 51(4), 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2024.2435779

13.

Brown

G. D. A.

Neath

Chater

(2007). A Temporal Ratio Model of Memory. Psychological Review, 114(3), 539–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.539

14.

Bullier

(2001). Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Research Reviews, 36(2–3), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00085-6

15.

Caldwell

A. R.

Lakens

Parlett-Pelleriti

Prochilo

Aust

(2019). Power analysis with superpower. Self Published on GitHub. https://aaroncaldwell.us/SuperpowerBook/

16.

Cowell

R. A.

Barense

M. D.

Sadil

P. S.

(2019). A roadmap for understanding memory: Decomposing cognitive processes into operations and representations. Eneuro, 6(4), ENEURO.0122-19.2019. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0122-19.2019

17.

Craik

F. I.

Tulving

(1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268

18.

Davidson

P. S. R.

Vidjen

Trincao-Batra

Collin

C. A.

(2018). Adults’ lure discrimination difficulties on the Mnemonic similarity test are significantly correlated with their visual perception. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(8), 1298–1307. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby130

19.

Ekstrom

A. D.

Yonelinas

A. P.

(2020). Precision, binding, and the hippocampus: precisely what are we talking about? Neuropsychologia, 138, 107341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107341

20.

Farhang

Toosi

Karami

Koushki

Kheirkhah

Shakerian

Noroozi

Rezayat

Vahabie

A.-H.

Dehaqani

M. R. A.

(2025). The impact of spatial frequency on hierarchical category representation in macaque temporal cortex. Communications Biology, 8(1), 801. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08230-5

21.

Faurite

Michaud

Cousin

Olivier

Gallice

Chiquet

Pietras

Attyé

Soler

Berry

Mermillod

Cottereau

B. R.

Peyrin

(2025). Neurobehavioral Changes in Macular Degeneration: Spatial Frequency Use in Scene Recognition. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 66(13), 54. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.13.54

22.

Gingras

Fiset

Plouffe-Demers

M. P.

Estéphan

N’Guiamba

Sun

Zhang

Blais

(2026). Cultural differences in spatial frequency tunings to faces do not generalize to visual scenes and object stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 33(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02832-0

23.

Hegdé

(2008). Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Progress in Neurobiology, 84(4), 405–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.09.001

24.

Hunt

R. R.

(2013). Precision in memory through distinctive processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412463228

25.

Hunt

R. R.

Worthen

J. B.

(2006). Distinctiveness and Memory. Oxford University Press.

26.

Kauffmann

Ramanoël

Guyader

Chauvin

Peyrin

(2015). Spatial frequency processing in scene-selective cortical regions. NeuroImage, 112, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.058

27.

Kauffmann

Ramanoël

Peyrin

(2014). The neural bases of spatial frequency processing during scene perception. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 8, 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00037

28.

Kent

B. A.

Hvoslef-Eide

Saksida

L. M.

Bussey

T. J.

(2016). The representational-hierarchical view of pattern separation: Not just hippocampus, not just space, not just memory? Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 129, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2016.01.006

29.

Koriat

Goldsmith

Pansky

(2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 481–537. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.Psych.51.1.481

30.

Kovalenko

L. Y.

Chaumon

Busch

N. A.

(2012). A pool of pairs of related objects (POPORO) for investigating visual semantic integration: Behavioral and electrophysiological validation. Brain Topography, 25(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-011-0216-8

31.

Kriegeskorte

Mur

Bandettini

P. A.

(2008). Representational similarity analysis-connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2, 249. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008

32.

Leal

S. L.

Yassa

M. A.

(2018). Integrating new findings and examining clinical applications of pattern separation. Nature Neuroscience, 21(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-017-0065-1

33.

Leys

Delacre

Mora

Y. L.

Lakens

Ley

(2019). How to classify, detect, and manage univariate and multivariate outliers, with emphasis on pre-registration. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.289

34.

Leys

Ley

Klein

Bernard

Licata

(2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of experimental social psychology, 49(4), 764–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013

35.

Loftus

E. F.

Palmer

J. C.

(1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3

36.

Loftus

E. F.

Palmer

J. C.

(1996). Eyewitness testimony. In Banyard

Grayson

(Eds.), Introducing psychological research: Sixty studies that shape psychology (pp. 305–309). Macmillan Education UK.

37.

Marr

(1971). Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 262, 23–81. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1971.0078

38.

Martin

C. B.

Barense

M. D.

(2023). Perception and memory in the ventral visual stream and medial temporal lobe. Annual Review of Vision Science, 9(1), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-091521-073116

39.

Mathôt

Schreij

Theeuwes

(2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324.

40.

Mille

Brambati

S. M.

Izaute

Vallet

G. T

. (2021). Low-resolution neurocognitive aging and cognition: An embodied perspective. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 15. https://doi. org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.687393

41.

Mille

Purkart

Versace

Vallet

G. T.

(2023a). Memory as a scale of simulation depending on the trace distinctiveness. Memory & Cognition, 51(4), 875–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.08.003

42.

Mille

Silvert

Versace

Izaute

Vallet

G. T.

(2023b). Sensory overlap for specific memories only matters for poor memory traces. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0374-6

43.

Murray

E. A.

Bussey

T. J.

(1999). Perceptual–mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01303-0

44.

Nairne

J. S.

(2006). Modeling distinctiveness: Implications for general memory theory. In Hunt

R. R.

Worthen

(Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 27–46). Oxford University Press.

45.

Pidgeon

L. M.

Morcom

A. M.

(2014). Age-related increases in false recognition: The role of perceptual and conceptual similarity. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 283. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00283

46.

Purkart

Mille

Versace

Vallet

G. T.

(2022). Playing “guess who?”: When an episodic specificity induction increases trace distinctiveness and reduces memory errors during event reconstruction. Memory, 30(5), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.2014527

47.

R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.4.4) [Computer software]. http://www.R-project.org/

48.

Racsmány

Bencze

Pajkossy

Szőllősi

Á.

Marián

(2021). Irrelevant background context decreases mnemonic discrimination and increases false memory. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 6204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85627-2

49.

Ramanoël

Kauffmann

Cousin

Dojat

Peyrin

(2015). Age-related differences in spatial frequency processing during scene categorization. PLoS One, 10(8), e0134554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134554

50.

Reyna

V. F.

Brainerd

C. J.

(1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7(1), 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4

51.

Roberts

M. M.

Schira

M. M.

Spehar

Isherwood

Z. J.

(2022). Nature in motion: the Tuning of the visual system to the spatiotemporal properties of natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 22(6), 7. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.6.7

52.

Roediger

H. L.

McDermott

K. B.

(1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803

53.

Roediger

H. L.

III Watson

J. M.

McDermott

K. B.

Gallo

D. A.

(2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 385–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196177

54.

Rolls

E. T.

(2013). The mechanisms for pattern completion and pattern separation in the hippocampus. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00074s

55.

Roux-Sibilon

Trouilloud

Kauffmann

Guyader

Mermillod

Peyrin

(2019). Influence of peripheral vision on object categorization in central vision. Journal of Vision, 19(14), 7. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.14.7

56.

Saksida

L. M.

Bussey

T. J.

(2010). The representational–hierarchical view of amnesia: Translation from animal to human. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2370–2384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.026

57.

Schacter

D. L.

(2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

58.

Schacter

D. L.

(2012). Constructive memory: Past and future. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/dschacter

59.

Schacter

D. L.

Benoit

R. G.

Szpunar

K. K

. (2017). Episodic future thinking: Mechanisms and functions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha. 2017.06.002

60.

Schyns

P. G.

Oliva

(1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time- and spatial- scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological science, 5(4), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00500.x

61.

Singmann

Bolker

Westfall

Aust

Ben-Shachar

M. S.

(2012). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.afex

62.

Stark

S. M.

Kirwan

C. B.

Stark

C. E.

(2019). Mnemonic similarity task: A tool for assessing hippocampal integrity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(11), 938–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.08.003

63.

Stark

S. M.

Yassa

M. A.

Stark

C. E. L.

(2010). Individual differences in spatial pattern separation performance associated with healthy aging in humans. Learning and Memory, 17(6), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.1768110

64.

Surprenant

A. M.

Neath

(2009). Principles of memory. Psychology Press.

65.

Torralba

Oliva

(2003). Statistics of natural image categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14(3), 391. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-898X_14_3_302

66.

Ventura

Morais

Brito-Mendes

Kolinsky

(2005). The mental representation of living and nonliving things: differential weighting and interactivity of sensorial and non-sensorial features. Memory, 13(2), 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000639

67.

Versace

Labeye

É.

Badard

Rose

(2009). The contents of long-term memory and the emergence of knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440801951844

68.

Versace

Vallet

G. T.

Riou

Lesourd

Labeye

É.

Brunel

(2014). Act-In: An integrated view of memory mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.892113

69.

Wamain

Garric

Lenoble

(2023). Dynamics of low-pass-filtered object categories: A decoding approach to ERP recordings. Vision Research, 204, 108165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2022.108165

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.02 MB

0.00 MB