Adaptive condition-based maintenance decision framework for deteriorating systems operating under variable environment and uncertain condition monitoring
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2012
Adaptive condition-based maintenance decision framework for deteriorating systems operating under variable environment and uncertain condition monitoring
The present article deals with the efficient use of different types of monitoring information in optimizing condition-based maintenance decision making for a deteriorating system operating under variable environment. The degradation phenomenon of a system is the fatigue crack growth that is modeled by a physics-based stochastic process. The environment process is assumed to be modeled by a time-homogenous Markov chain with finite state space. We suppose that the environmental condition is observed perfectly, while the crack depth can be assessed imperfectly through a non-destructive ultrasonic technique. As such, two kinds of indirect information are available on the system at each inspection time: environmental covariate and diagnostic covariate. Based on this set of information, two condition-based maintenance strategies adaptive to environmental conditions are developed. In the first one, the adaptation scheme is time-based, while in the second, it is condition-based. These maintenance strategies are compared one with another and to a classical non-adaptive one to point out the performances of each adaptation scheme and hence the appreciation of using different information sources in maintenance decision making.
KalbfleischJDPrenticeRL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley, 2002.
2.
WangW. Condition-based maintenance modelling. In: Complex system maintenance handbook, Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. London: Springer, 2008, pp.111–131.
3.
KharoufehJP. Explicit results for wear processes in a markovian environment. Ops Res Letts2003; 31(3): 237–244.
4.
DelouxECastanierBBérenguerC. Predictive maintenance policy for a gradually deteriorating system subject to stress. Rel Engng Sys Saf2009; 94(2): 418–431.
5.
ZhaoXFouladiradMBérenguerC. Condition-based inspection/replacement policies for non-monotone deteriorating systems with environmental covariates. Rel Engng Sys Saf2010; 95(8): 921–934.
6.
HuynhKTBarrosABérenguerC. A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events. Rel Engng Sys Saf2011; 96(4): 497–508.
7.
WangW. A prognosis model for wear prediction based on oil-based monitoring. J Opl Res Soc2006; 58(7): 887–893.
8.
XuZJiYZhouD. Real-time reliability prediction for a dynamic system based on the hidden degradation process identification. IEEE Trans Rel2008; 57(2): 230–242.
9.
CadiniFZioEAvramD. Model-based monte carlo state estimation for condition-based component replacement. Rel Engng Sys Saf2009; 94(3): 752–758.
10.
HuynhKTBarrosABérenguerC. Maintenance decision-making for systems operating under indirect condition monitoring: value of online information and impact of measurement uncertainty. IEEE Trans Rel2012; 61(2): 410–425.
11.
MyötyriEPulkkinenUSimolaK. Application of stochastic filtering for lifetime prediction. Rel Engng Sys Saf2006; 91(2): 200–208.
12.
ZioEPeloniG. Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components. Rel Engng Sys Saf2011; 96(3): 403–409.
13.
YangYKlutkeGA. Improved inspection schemes for deteriorating equipment. Probability Engng Info Sci2000; 14(4): 445–460.
14.
GrallADieulleLBérenguerC. Continuous-time predictive-maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. IEEE Trans Rel2002; 51(2): 141–150.
15.
BarkerCNewbyM. Optimal non-periodic inspection for a multivariate degradation model. Rel Engng Sys Saf2009; 94(1): 33–43.
16.
PonchetAFouladiradMGrallA. Assessment of a maintenance model for a multi-deteriorating mode system. Rel Engng Sys Saf2010; 95(11): 1244–1254.
WangX. Physical degradation models. In: RuggeriFKenettRFaltinFW (eds) Encyclopedia of statistics in quality and reliability. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2007, pp.1356–1361.
19.
KozinFBogdanoffJL. Probabilistic models of fatigue crack growth: results and speculations. Nuclear Engineering and Design1989; 115(1): 143–171.
20.
BigerelleMIostA. Bootstrap analysis of FCGR, application to the Paris relationship and to lifetime prediction. Int J Fatigue1999; 21(4): 299–307.
21.
WhittakerICSaundersSC. Application of reliability analysis to aircraft structures subject to fatigue crack growth and periodic structural inspection. Techical Report AFML-TR-73-92, Air Force Material Laboratories, 1973.
22.
LinYKYangJN. On statistical moments of fatigue crack propagation. Engng Fract Mechanics1983; 18(2): 243–256.
23.
KozinFBogdanoffJL. A critical analysis of some probabilistic models of fatigue crack growth. Engng Fract Mechanics1981; 14(1): 59–89.
24.
YangJNManningSD. A simple second order approximation for stochastic crack growth analysis. Engng Fract Mechanics1996; 53(5): 677–686.
25.
XingJZhongOPHongYJ. A simple log normal random process approach of the fatigue crack growth considering the distribution of initial crack size and loading condition. Int J Pressure Vessels and Piping1997; 74(1): 7–12.
26.
WuWNiC. A study of stochastic fatigue crack growth modeling through experimental data. Probabilistic Engng Mechanics2003; 18(2): 107–118.
27.
WuWFNiCC. Probabilistic models of fatigue crack propagation and their experimental verification. Probabilistic Engng Mechanics2004; 19(3): 247–257.
28.
ÖzekiciS. Optimal maintenance policies in random environments. Eur J Opl Res1995; 82(2): 283–294.
29.
CoxDR. Regression models and life-tables. J Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodol)1972; 34(2): 187–220.
van NoortwijkJMvan der WeideJAM. Applications to continuous-time processes of computational techniques for discrete-time renewal processes. Rel Engng Sys Saf2008; 93(12): 1853–1860.
TijmsHC. A first course in stochastic models. New York: Wiley, 2003.
34.
MannLSaxenaAKnappGM. Statistical-based or condition-based preventive maintenance?J Qual Maint Engng1995; 1(1): 46–59.
35.
OrchardMEVachtsevanosGJ. A particle-filtering approach for on-line fault diagnosis and failure prognosis. Trans Inst Measurement Control2009; 31(3–4): 221.
36.
SunYMaLMathewJ. Mechanical systems hazard estimation using condition monitoring. Mech Sys Signal Processing2006; 20(5): 1189–1201.
37.
BaruahPChinnamRB. HMMs for diagnostics and prognostics in machining processes. Int J Prod Res2005; 43(6): 1275–1293.
38.
SiXSWangWHuCH. Remaining useful life estimation - a review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur J Opl Res2011; 213(1): 1–14.
39.
ArulampalamMSMaskellSGordonN. A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Processing2002; 50(2): 174–188.
40.
DoucetADe FreitasNGordonN. Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. Springer Verlag, New York, 2001.
41.
KitagawaG. Monte carlo filter and smoother for non-gaussian nonlinear state space models. J Computational Graphical Stats1996; 5(1): 1–25.
42.
BelegunduADChandrupatlaTR. Optimization concepts and applications in engineering. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2011.
