Assessing the efficiency of maintenance operators: A case study of turning railway wheelsets on an under-floor wheel lathe

Abstract

This article assesses the technical efficiency of different operators turning railway wheelsets on an under-floor wheel lathe. This type of lathe is a computer numerical control machine used to turn wheelsets in situ on the train. As railway wheels are turned, a certain amount of the wheel diameter is lost to restore the tread profile and full flange thickness of the wheel. The technical efficiencies of the different wheel lathe operators are assessed using a stochastic frontier analysis, while controlling for other explaining variables such as the flange thickness and the occurrence of rolling contact fatigue defects, wheel flats and cavities. Different model specifications for the stochastic frontier analysis are compared with linear mixed model specifications, showing that the stochastic frontier analysis model exhibits a better Akaike information criterion.

Keywords

Technical efficiency railway maintenance stochastic frontier analysis linear mixed models performance modelling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bogetoft

Otto

. Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.

Andrade

Stow

. Statistical modelling of wear and damage trajectories of railway wheelsets. Qual Reliab Eng Int 2016; 32: 2909–2923.

Farrell

. The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A: G 1957; 120: 253–290.

Kumbhakar

Lovell

. Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Meeusen

Van den Broeck

. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 1977; 18: 435–444.

Aigner

Lovell

Schmidt

. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econometrics 1977; 6: 21–37.

Battese

Corra

. Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia. Aust J Agr Econ 1977; 21: 169–179.

Michaelides

Belegri-Roboli

Karlaftis

. International air transportation carriers: evidence from SFA and DEA technical efficiency results (1991–2000). Eur J Transport Infrastruct Res 2009; 9: 347–362.

Scotti

Malighetti

Martini

. The impact of airport competition on technical efficiency: a stochastic frontier analysis applied to Italian airport. J Air Transp Manag 2012; 22: 9–15.

10.

Welde

Odeck

. The efficiency of Norwegian road toll companies. Util Pol 2011; 19: 162–171.

11.

Filippini

Koller

Masiero

. Competitive tendering versus performance-based negotiation in Swiss public transport. Transport Res A: Pol 2015; 82: 158–168.

12.

Smith

. The application of stochastic frontier panel models in economic regulation: experience from the European rail sector. Transport Res E: Log 2012; 48: 503–515.

13.

Farsi

Filippini

Greene

. Efficiency measurement in network industries: application to the Swiss railway companies. J Regul Econ 2005; 28: 69–90.

14.

Simões

Marques

. On the economic performance of the waste sector. A literature review. J Environ Manage 2012; 106: 40–47.

15.

Team

. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014.

16.

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J Stat Softw 2015; 67: 1–48.

17.

Griffin

Steel

. Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis using WinBUGS. J Prod Anal 2007; 27: 163–176.

18.

Andrade

Teixeira

. Statistical modelling of railway track geometry degradation using hierarchical Bayesian models. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2015; 142: 169–183.