Different from other forms of power generation, wind power generation has the characteristics of randomness, intermittentness, and volatility. Therefore, the wind power generation system (WPGS) is more prone to failures caused by external impacts during the operation. The reliability of the WPGS has a significant influence on the safety of large-scale power grid systems. Thus, how to accurately evaluate the reliability of the WPGS that is integrated into large-scale power grid systems has become a new challenge. Implementing effective resilience management in WPGSs can improve their ability to handle interruptions and increase the safety of the grid-connected system. This research proposes a new method of resilience management based on importance measure for the WPGS after multi-node failures due to natural disasters or man-made accidents. Firstly, both the performance of the WPGS before multi-node failures and the performance of the WPGS after multiple nodes failures are analyzed. Then, the performance loss and the performance recovery of the WPGS are evaluated. Finally, a new method for judging the loss importance measure of node, the recovery importance measure of node, and the resilience importance measure are proposed. The objective of this research is to analyze the restoration sequence of failed nodes in the WPGS with multi-node failures such that the system recover can be faster and more effective. The proposed method is proven to be effective by introducing the WPGS into the IEEE five-machine 14-node system.
KarakasisNMademlisC.High efficiency control strategy in a wind energy conversion system with doubly fed induction generator. Renew Energy2018; 125: 974–984.
2.
YangLPengRLiG, et al. Operations management of wind farms integrating multiple impacts of wind conditions and resource constraints. Energy Convers Manag2020; 205: 112162.
3.
IzquierdoJMarquezAUribetxebarriaJ, et al. On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects. Renew Energy2020; 153: 1100–1110.
4.
MahelaOShaikA.Comprehensive overview of grid interfaced wind energy generation systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016; 57: 260–281.
5.
ShafiullahGOoAAliA, et al. Potential challenges of integrating large-scale wind energy into the power grid-A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2013; 20: 306–321.
6.
SiSZhaoHCaiZ, et al. Recent advances in system reliability optimization driven by importance measures. Front Eng Manag2020; 7(3): 335–358.
7.
ChenLWDuiHYZhangC.A resilience measure for supply chain systems considering the interruption with the cyber-physical systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2020; 199: 106869.
8.
JiaHPengRDingY, et al. Reliability analysis of distributed storage systems considering data loss and theft. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2019; 234(2): 303–321.
9.
WoodsDD.Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2015; 141: 5–9.
10.
DuiHMengXXiaoH, et al. Analysis of the cascading failure for scale-free networks based on a multi-strategy evolutionary game. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2020; 199: 106919.
11.
HuangCYangHRenW, et al. Fault recoverability analysis of interconnected systems. IET Control Theory Appl2019; 13(4): 554–561.
12.
DuiHZhengXWuS.Resilience analysis of maritime transportation systems based on importance measures. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2021; 209: 107461.
13.
PengRXiaoHGuoJ, et al. Defending a parallel system against a strategic attacker with redundancy, protection and disinformation. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2020; 193: 106651.
14.
MolyneauxLBrownCWagnerL, et al. Measuring resilience in energy systems: insights from a range of disciplines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016; 59: 1068–1079.
15.
FengQZhaoXFanD, et al. Resilience design method based on meta-structure: a case study of offshore wind farm. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2019; 186: 232–244.
16.
MaKZhouDBlaabjergF.Evaluation and design tools for the reliability of wind power converter system. J Power Electron2015; 15(5): 1149–1157.
17.
GilaniMKazemiAGhasemiM.Distribution system resilience enhancement by microgrid formation considering distributed energy resources. Energy2020; 191: 116442.
18.
WatsonEEtemadiA.Modeling electrical grid resilience under hurricane wind conditions with increased solar and wind power generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst2020; 35(2): 929–937.
19.
NguyenHMuhsJParvaniaM.Assessing impacts of energy storage on resilience of distribution systems against hurricanes. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy2019; 7(4): 731–740.
20.
KrishnanVGopalSLiuR, et al. Resilient cyber infrastructure for the minimum wind curtailment remedial control scheme. IEEE Trans Ind Appl2019; 55(1): 943–953.
21.
RoccoCBarkerKMorontaJ, et al. Community detection and resilience in multi-source, multi-terminal networks. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2018; 232(6): 616–626.
22.
JiaHDingYPengR, et al. Reliability assessment and activation sequence optimization of non-repairable multi-state generation systems considering warm standby. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2020; 195: 106736.
23.
BinLPanHHeL, et al. An importance analysis–based weight evaluation framework for identifying key components of multi-configuration off-grid wind power generation systems under stochastic data inputs. Energies2019; 12(22): 1–22.
24.
LiGHuangGBieZ, et al. Component importance assessment of power systems for improving resilience under wind storms. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy2019; 7(4): 676–687.
25.
ScherbAGarreLStraubD.Evaluating component importance and reliability of power transmission networks subject to windstorms: methodology and application to the Nordic grid. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2019; 191: 106517.
26.
MiziulaPNavarroJ.Birnbaum importance measure for reliability systems with dependent components. IEEE Trans Reliab2019; 68(2): 439–450.
27.
DuiHSiSYamR.Importance measures for optimal structure in linear consecutive-k-out-of-n systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2018; 169: 339–350.
28.
AlmoghathawiYBarkerK.Component importance measures for interdependent infrastructure network resilience. Comput Ind Eng2019; 133: 153–164.
29.
BalakrishnanSZhangZ.Criticality and susceptibility indexes for resilience-based ranking and prioritization of components in interdependent infrastructure networks. J Manag Eng2020; 36(4): 04020022.
30.
FangYPedroniNZioE.Resilience-based component importance measures for critical infrastructure network systems. IEEE Trans Reliab2016; 65(2): 502–512.
31.
BaroudHBarkerK.A Bayesian kernel approach to modeling resilience-based network component importance. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2018; 170: 10–19.
32.
LyuDSiSCaiZ, et al. Computational method for importance measure of the k-out-of-n system based on stress–strength interference. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2020; 234(1): 27–40.
33.
YanXQiuHPengR, et al. Optimal configuration of a power grid system with a dynamic performance sharing mechanism. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2020; 193: 106613.
34.
DuiHZhangCZhengX.Component joint importance measures for maintenances in submarine blowout preventer system. J Loss Prev Process Ind2020; 63: 104003.
35.
CompareMBelloraMZioE.Aggregation of importance measures for decision making in reliability engineering. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2017; 231(3): 242–254.
36.
DuiHLiSXingL, et al. System performance-based joint importance analysis guided maintenance for repairable systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2019; 186: 162–175.
37.
BirnbaumZW. On the importance of different components in a multi-component system. In: KrishnaiahPR (ed.) Multivariate analysis II. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1969, pp.581–592.
38.
ZhangCXuXDuiHY.Resilience measure of network systems by node and edge indicators. Reliab Eng Syst Safe2020; 202: 107035.
