In this paper, a safety evaluation method of subsea High Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS) based on a generalized stochastic Petri net model is proposed. Different test methods were used to detect different types of failures and to analyze the reliability of HIPPS components under the influence of common cause failures and incomplete repair. The reliability curve of a diagnostic system consisting of a transmitter system and a logic system under the influence of uncertainty over time is analyzed. The safety of HIPPS with diverse test methods were quantitatively analyzed. The results show a significant improvement in the performance of the system after testing and maintenance. Both partial-stroke testing and increased partial-stroke test coverage can be used to increase the HIPPS performance compared to traditional methods. The analysis of the Partial stroke test (PST) strategy can afford a academic basis for the selection of PST frequency and Functional test (FT) interval in practical engineering.
ChangYWuXZhangC, et al. Dynamic Bayesian networks based approach for risk analysis of subsea wellhead fatigue failure during service life. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2019; 188: 454–462.
2.
PangNJiaPLiuP, et al. A fuzzy Markov model for risk and reliability prediction of engineering systems: a case study of a subsea wellhead connector. Appl Sci2020; 10: 6902.
3.
WangCLiuYHouW, et al. Reliability and availability modeling of subsea Xmas tree system using dynamic Bayesian network with different maintenance methods. J Loss Prev Process Ind2020; 64: 104066.
4.
CaiBFanHShaoX, et al. Remaining useful life re-prediction methodology based on Wiener process: Subsea Christmas tree system as a case study. Comput Ind Eng2021; 151: 240–249.
5.
CaiBShaoXLiuY, et al. Remaining useful life estimation of structure systems under the influence of multiple causes: subsea pipelines as a case study. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2020; 67(7): 5737–5747.
6.
LiYZhangYKennedyD. Reliability analysis of subsea pipelines under spatially varying ground motions by using subset simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2018; 172: 74–83.
7.
YangXPengYHuM. Application of Hipps system in compressor station of long distance pipeline. Pet Eng Constr2019; 45: 56–59.
8.
WangCLiuYHouW, et al. Reliability and availability modeling of subsea autonomous high integrity pressure protection system with partial stroke test by dynamic Bayesian. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2021; 235: 268–281.
9.
BakLSirevaagRStokkeH. Hipps protects subsea production in Hp/Ht conditions. Offshore2007; 67(6): 72, 74, 76.
10.
WuSZhangLLundteigenMA, et al. Reliability assessment for final elements of SISs with time dependent failures. J Loss Prev Process Ind2018; 51: 186–199.
11.
MasoudDHasanHNajafiT. Dynamic reliability assessment of safety instrumented system based on reliability models. Caspian J Appl Sci Res2015; 7: 26–36.
12.
IEC61508. Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2000.
13.
Di FebbraroAGiglioDSaccoN. A deterministic and stochastic petri net model for traffic-responsive signaling control in urban areas. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2016; 17(2): 510–524.
14.
InnalFLundteigenMALiuY, et al. PFDavg generalized formulas for SIS subject to partial and full periodic tests based on multi-phase Markov models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2016; 150: 160–170.
15.
WuSZhangLZhengW, et al. Reliability modeling of subsea SISs partial testing subject to delayed restoration. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2019; 191: 106546.
16.
JinHRausandM. Reliability of safety-instrumented systems subject to partial testing and common-cause failures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2014; 121: 146–151.
17.
CaiBKongXLiuY, et al. Application of Bayesian networks in reliability evaluation. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2019; 15: 2146–2157.
18.
CaiBLiuYZhangY, et al. Dynamic Bayesian networks based performance evaluation of subsea blowout preventers in presence of imperfect repair. Expert Syst Appl2013; 40: 7544–7554.
19.
LeeDChoiD. Analysis of the reliability of a starter-generator using a dynamic Bayesian network. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2020; 195: 106628.
20.
PangNJiaPWangL, et al. Dynamic Bayesian network-based reliability and safety assessment of the subsea Christmas tree. Process Saf Environ Prot2021; 145: 435–446.
21.
Chastain-KnightD. Confirming the safety instrumented system layer of protection. Process Saf Prog2020; 39: 1.
22.
TheobeldMC. Subsea high integrity pressure protection systems for high pressure oil and gas developments. In: Offshore technology conference, Houston, TX, 1996.
23.
LangvikSAarebrotE. High integrity pressure protection systems for production applications. SPE Adv Technol Ser1996; 4: 155–159.
24.
Nelson-BridgewaterSHiezMCaudinJ, et al. High integrity pressure protection system for ESP activated wells. In: SPE international conference on health, Long Beach, CA, 2014.
25.
LundteigenMARausandM. Partial stroke testing of process shutdown valves: how to determine the test coverage. J Loss Prev Process Ind2008; 21(6): 579–588.
26.
LedererCAltstadtS. 2008. Introduction to partial stroke testing. In: SICE annual conference 2008 – international conference on instrumentation, control and information technology, Tokyo, Japan.
27.
SummersAZacharyB. Partial-stroke testing of safety block valves. Control Engineering2000; 12: 87–89.
28.
LiuYRausandM. Reliability effects of test strategies on safety-instrumented systems in different demand modes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2013; 119: 235–243.
29.
WuZ. An introduction to Petri Nets. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press, 2006.
30.
LiuZLiuYCaiB, et al. Reliability analysis of multiplex control system of subsea blowout preventer based on stochastic Petri Net. Tehnički Vjesnik2017; 24: 7–14.
31.
LiuZLiuYCaiB, et al. Application of Petri Nets to performance evaluation of subsea blowout preventer system. ISA Trans2015; 54: 240–249.
32.
LuZZhangZZhuangL, et al. Reliability model of the fly-by-wire system based on stochastic Petri Net. Int J Aerosp Eng2019; 2019: 1–12.
33.
KumarGJainVGandhiOP. Reliability and availability analysis of mechanical systems using stochastic petri net modeling based on decomposition approach. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng2012; 19(1): 1.
34.
O’ConnorPDT. An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering Charles E. Ebeling, Mcgraw-Hill, 1997. Number of pages: 489. Price: £22.99. Qual Reliab Eng Int1998; 14(4): 295–466.
35.
YuanLCuiZD. Reliability analysis for the consecutive-K-out-of-N: F system with repairmen taking multiple vacations. Appl Math Model2013; 37(7): 4685–4697.
36.
YuanC. Principles and applications of Petri nets. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2005.
37.
TorO. Reliability data for safety instrumented systems. PDS Data Handb2010; 31(4): 56–60.
38.
GermanRKellingCZimmermannA, et al. Timenet: a toolkit for evaluating non-Markovian stochastic petri nets. Perform Eval1995; 24(1–2): 69–87.
39.
CaiBLiuYMaY, et al. Real-time reliability evaluation methodology based on dynamic Bayesian networks: a case study of a subsea pipe ram BOP system. ISA Trans2015; 58: 595–604.
40.
CaiBZhaoYLiuH, et al. A data-driven fault diagnosis methodology in three-phase inverters for PMSM drive systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron2017; 32: 5590–5600.
