Thruster fault identification using improved peak region energy and multiple model least square support vector data description for autonomous underwater vehicle
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2024
Thruster fault identification using improved peak region energy and multiple model least square support vector data description for autonomous underwater vehicle
This article investigates a novel fault identification approach to determine the percentage of the thrust loss for autonomous underwater vehicle thrusters. The novel approach is developed from a combination of the peak region energy (PRE) and support vector data description (SVDD) by considering that PRE is able to acquire a primary feature in low dimensions from signals without any secondary process and that SVDD can establish a hypersphere boundary for a class of fault samples even in the case of a small number of training samples. Three improvements, namely removing the fusion, an energy leakage and a homomorphic transform are applied to the PRE. It forms an improved PRE to increase the area under the curve. Furthermore, another three new contents, namely the least square, a multiple model fusion and a dead zone are added to the SVDD. It constructs a multiple model least square SVDD to increase the overall identification accuracy. Experiments are performed on an experimental prototype autonomous underwater vehicle in a pool. The experimental results indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
VuMTLeTHThanhHLNN, et al. Robust position control of an over-actuated underwater vehicle under model uncertainties and ocean current effects using dynamic sliding mode surface and optimal allocation control. Sensors2021; 21: 1–24.
2.
SunGJirongXJunqiQ, et al. Multistep thrust allocation method based on priority idea for remotely operated underwater vehicle with horizontal thrusters configured as X shape. Int J Adv Rob Syst2022; 19(2): 17298806221090077.
3.
HouCLiXWangH, et al. Fuzzy linear extended states observer-based iteration learning fault-tolerant control for autonomous underwater vehicle trajectory-tracking system. IET Control Theory Appl2022. DOI:10.1049/cth2.12288.
4.
TangQLiYGuoR, et al. Chattering-suppression sliding mode control of an autonomous underwater vehicle based on nonlinear disturbance observer and power function reaching law. Trans Inst Meas Control2021; 43(9): 2081–2093.
5.
HuangYLiYYuJ, et al. State-of-the-art and development trends of AUV intelligence. Robot2020; 42(2): 215–231.
6.
SunYChaiPZhangG, et al. Sliding mode motion control for AUV with dual-observer considering thruster uncertainty. J Mar Sci Eng2022; 10(3): 349.
7.
ChenY-YLeeC-YHuangY-X, et al. Control allocation design for torpedo-like underwater vehicles with multiple actuators. Actuators2022; 11(4): 104.
8.
ChengXZhuDSunB, et al. Principal component analysis algorithm for fault diagnosis of thruster system in deep-sea human occupied vehicle. Control Theory Appl2018; 35(12): 1796–1804.
9.
DingXZhuDYanM. Research on static fault-tolerant control method of thruster based on MPC. J Mar Sci Technol2021; 26: 861–871.
10.
Li-YingHZhangHWeiY, et al. Fault-tolerant compensation control based on sliding mode technique of unmanned marine vehicles subject to unknown persistent ocean disturbances. Int J Control Autom Syst2020; 18(3): 739–754.
11.
YangJChenFBoH, et al. Actuator fault diagnosis in autonomous underwater vehicle based on neural network. Sens Actuators, A2021; 324: 1–7.
12.
ChenYChuZLiuK, et al. Research progress on thruster fault diagnosis technology for deep-sea underwater vehicle. J Propul Technol2020; 41(11): 2465–2474.
13.
CapocciROmerdicEGerardD, et al. Fault-tolerant control for ROVs using control reallocation and power isolation. J Mar Sci Eng2018; 6(2): 1–30.
14.
dos SantosCHFCardozoDIKReginattoR, et al. Bank of controllers and virtual thrusters for fault-tolerant control of autonomous underwater vehicles. Ocean Eng2016; 121: 210–223.
15.
BoZRogerSMogensB, et al. Particle filter for fault diagnosis and robust navigation of underwater robot. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2014; 22(6): 2399–2407.
16.
LiuFTangHLuoJ, et al. Fault-tolerant control of active compensation toward actuator faults: an autonomous underwater vehicle example. Appl Ocean Res2021; 110: 1–8.
17.
ZuevAZhirabokAFilaretovV. Fault identification in underwater vehicle thrusters via sliding mode observers. Appl Math Comput Sci2020; 30(4): 679–688.
18.
ChuZMengFZhuD, et al. Fault reconstruction using a terminal sliding mode observer for a class of second-order MIMO uncertain nonlinear systems. ISA Trans2020; 97: 67–75.
19.
JagadeeshKParasharAAnthakumarM, et al. Actuator fault-tolerant control study of an underwater robot with four rotatable thrusters. Ocean Eng2020; 197: 1–19.
20.
ZhenzhongCYunsaiCDaqiZ, et al. Observer-based fault detection for magnetic coupling underwater thrusters with applications in Jiaolong HOV. Ocean Eng2020; 210: 1–10.
21.
QianLDaqiZYangSX. Unmanned underwater vehicles fault identification and fault-tolerant control method based on FCA-CMAC neural networks, applied on an actuated vehicle. J Intell Robot Syst2012; 66(4): 463–475.
22.
GaofeiXWeiGYangZ, et al. Online learning based underwater robotic thruster fault detection. Appl Sci2021; 11(8): 1–29.
23.
DachengYChenguangZMingjunZ, et al. Experimental study on multi-domain fault features of AUV with weak thruster fault. Machines2022; 10(4): 236.
24.
ChanTKChinCS. Health stages diagnostics of underwater thruster using sound features with imbalanced dataset. Neural Comput Appl2019; 31(10): 5767–5782.
25.
RaananB-YBellinghamJZhangY, et al. Detection of unanticipated faults for autonomous underwater vehicles using online topic models. J Field Robotics2018; 35(5): 705–716.
26.
JiayuHYeLJianC, et al. An improved particle filter propeller fault prediction method based on grey prediction for underwater vehicles. Trans Inst Meas Control2020; 42(11): 1946–1959.
27.
BaojiYFengYYujiaW, et al. Fault degree identification method for thruster of autonomous underwater vehicle using homomorphic membership function and low frequency trend prediction. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233(4): 1426–1440.
28.
ZhangMYinBLiuW, et al. Thruster fault feature extraction for autonomous underwater vehicle in time-varying ocean currents based on single-channel blind source separation. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2016; 230(1): 46–57.
29.
YaoFWangFZhangM. Weak thruster fault detection for autonomous underwater vehicle based on artificial immune and signal pre-processing. Adv Mech Eng2018; 10(2): 1–13.
30.
LvTChenZYaoF, et al. Fault feature extraction method based on optimized sparse decomposition algorithm for AUV with weak thruster fault. Ocean Eng2021; 233: 1–12.
31.
Amir HoseinZAbdolrezaO. Application of energies of optimal frequency bands for fault diagnosis based on modified distance function. J Mech Sci Technol2017; 31(6): 2701–2709.
32.
WathiqASanjaySRobertS, et al. An unmanned marine vehicle thruster fault diagnosis scheme based on OFNDA. J Mar Eng Technol2017; 16(1): 37–44.
33.
WenbinZYanpingSYasongP, et al. Gear fault diagnosis method using ensemble empirical mode decomposition energy distribution and grey similar incidence. J Mech Eng2014; 50(7): 70–77.
34.
BaojiYMingjunZXiL, et al. A fault diagnosis approach for autonomous underwater vehicle thrusters using time-frequency entropy enhancement and boundary constraint–assisted relative gray relational grade. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2019; 234(4): 512–526.
35.
ZhangMYinBLiuX, et al. Thruster fault identification method for autonomous underwater vehicle using peak region energy and least square grey relational grade. Adv Mech Eng2015; 7(12): 1–11.
36.
LiuWWanYgB, et al. Thruster fault identification based on fractal feature and multiresolution wavelet decomposition for autonomous underwater vehicle. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2017; 231(13): 2528–2539.
37.
YuDZhuCZhangM. The autonomous underwater vehicle thruster weak fault identification based on gray relational theory. J Harbin Eng Univ2020; 41(8): 1223–1229.
38.
WathiqASanjaySRobertS. Neural network fault diagnosis of a trolling motor based on feature reduction techniques for an unmanned surface vehicle. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2015; 229(8): 738–750.
39.
DuanCMakisVDengC. Optimal Bayesian early fault detection for CNC equipment using hidden semi-Markov process. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 122: 290–306.
40.
ShuangGBoHFeiY, et al. An abnormal motion condition monitoring method based on the dynamic model and complex network for AUV. Ocean Eng2021; 237(2): 1–11.
41.
LiuCGrylliasK. A semi-supervised support vector data description-based fault detection method for rolling element bearings based on cyclic spectral analysis. Mech Syst Sig Process2020; 140: 1–24.
ZhaoYJiaRLiuC. An evaluation method of underwater ocean environment safety situation based on D-S evidence theory. Adv Meteorol2015; 2015(1): 1–8.
44.
YiQShurenQYongfangM. Fundamental wave detection based on wavelet transform and empirical mode decomposition with application in mechanical system. J Mech Eng2008; 44(03): 135–142.
45.
WuJChenXMaZ. A signal decomposition method for ultrasonic guided wave generated from debonding combining smoothed pseudo Wigner-ville distribution and Vold–Kalman filter order tracking. Shock Vib2017; 2017(5): 1–13.
46.
RipulGAparnaASatishK, et al. Time-frequency analysis based robust vehicle detection using seismic sensor. J Sound Vib2015; 346(1): 424–434.
47.
ShenZHeZChenX, et al. A monotonic degradation assessment index of rolling bearings using fuzzy support vector data description and running time. Sensors2012; 12: 10109–10135.
