There are two general methods of robust design optimization (RDO) and reliability-based robust design optimization (RBRDO) for the optimal design of structures with non-deterministic variables. In the problem-solving process of both RDO and RBRDO, assessing the probabilistic constraints of the problem and the standard deviation of the structural responses is time-consuming and costly. In this study, by presenting a multi-step approach, for a probable optimal solution, the deterministic constraints are first investigated. Then the limit state functions related to probabilistic constraints are computed based on the mean value of random variables (in the RBRDO problem) and in the step of uncertainties effects simulation on the response of the structure, probabilistic constraints are evaluated (in the RBRDO problem). Designs that not meeting the deterministic constraints or in the unsafe area for the mean values of the random variables are not included in calculating the first and second terms of the objective function and reliability assessment. This leads to reduce the volume of calculations. The Monte Carlo simulation method is used to assess the probabilistic constraints, and the EVPS metaheuristic algorithm is used for the optimization process. Three benchmark trusses of 10, 25, and 72 bars were studied to assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The first objective function in these problems was the mean weight of trusses and the second objective function was the standard deviation of the displacement of a specific node in a certain direction.
DoltsinisIKangZ.Robust design of structures using optimization methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2004; 193: 2221–2237.
3.
KalsiMHackerKLewisK. A comprehensive robust design approach for decision trade-offs in complex systems design. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 1999, pp.1343–1354. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
4.
ShinSSamanliogluFChoBR, et al. Computing trade-offs in robust design: perspectives of the mean squared error. Comput Ind Eng2011; 60: 248–255.
5.
PourzeynaliSSalimiS.Robust multi-objective optimization design of active tuned mass damper system to mitigate the vibrations of a high-rise building. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2015; 229: 26–43.
6.
BhattacharjyaSChakrabortyS.An improved robust multi-objective optimization of structure with random parameters. Adv Struct Eng2018; 21: 1597–1607.
7.
DuXSudjiantoAChenW.An integrated framework for optimization under uncertainty using inverse reliability strategy. J Mech Des2004; 126: 562–570.
8.
RathodVYadavOPRathoreA, et al. Optimizing reliability-based robust design model using multi-objective genetic algorithm. Comput Ind Eng2013; 66: 301–310.
9.
YadavOPBhamareSSRathoreA.Reliability-based robust design optimization: A multi-objective framework using hybrid quality loss function. Qual Reliab Eng Int2010; 26: 27–41.
10.
YounBDChoiKKYiK.Performance moment integration (PMI) method for quality assessment in reliability-based robust design optimization. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2005; 33: 185–213.
11.
SunYChenKZhangQ, et al. Hybrid reliability analysis and robust optimum process design as applied to hot stamping of steel sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 110: 655–665.
12.
LiaoK-WLuHJ.A stable reliability-based optimization via a decomposing approach. Adv Struct Eng2012; 15: 1947–1961.
13.
ToğanV.Optimization of monopod offshore tower under uncertainties with gradient-based and gradient-free optimization algorithms. Adv Struct Eng2012; 15: 2021–2032.
14.
Van SonNParkHMJeongMC, et al. Simple approaches for efficiently reliability-based design optimization of bridges. Adv Struct Eng2011; 14: 857–870.
15.
LiXDuJChenZ, et al. Reliability-based NC milling parameters optimization using ensemble metamodel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 97: 3359–3369.
16.
WanLChenHOuyangL, et al. A new ensemble modeling approach for reliability-based design optimization of flexure-based bridge-type amplification mechanisms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 106: 47–63.
17.
IbrahimMHKharmandaGCharkiA.Reliability-based design optimization for fatigue damage analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2015; 76: 1021–1030.
18.
AhmadiBAhmadiBCheginiSN, et al. Multi-objective reliability-based optimal synthesis of path generating four-bar mechanisms: a cooperative game theoretic approach. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2022; 236: 2298–2311.
19.
ChenZWuZLiX, et al. An accuracy analysis method for first-order reliability method. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 233: 4319–4327.
20.
YounBD.Adaptive-loop method for non-deterministic design optimization. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2007; 221: 107–116.
21.
NikolaidisEBurdissoR.Reliability based optimization: a safety index approach. Comput Struct1988; 28: 781–788.
22.
Hoseini VaezSRFathaliMAMehanpourH.A two-step approach for reliability-based design optimization in power transmission line towers. Int J Interact Des Manuf2022; 16: 1015–1039.
23.
ChenZQiuHGaoL, et al. An adaptive decoupling approach for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct2013; 117: 58–66.
24.
DubourgVSudretBBourinetJ-M.Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2011; 44: 673–690.
25.
RoysetJODer KiureghianAPolakE.Reliability-based optimal structural design by the decoupling approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2001; 73: 213–221.
26.
ChenXHasselmanTNeillD, Reliability based structural design optimization for practical applications. In: Proceedings of 38th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1997, p.1403, Kissimmee, FL, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
27.
ShanSWangGG.Reliable design space and complete single-loop reliability-based design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2008; 93: 1218–1230.
28.
YangI-THsiehY-H.Reliability-based design optimization with discrete design variables and non-smooth performance functions: AB-PSO algorithm. Autom Constr2011; 20: 610–619.
29.
AouesYChateauneufA.Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2010; 41: 277–294.
30.
SchuëllerGIJensenHA.Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties – an overview. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2008; 198: 2–13.
31.
YuHGillotFIchchouM.A polynomial chaos expansion based reliability method for linear random structures. Adv Struct Eng2012; 15: 2097–2111.
32.
GondalZULeeJ.Reliability assessment using feed-forward neural network-based approximate meta-models. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2012; 226: 448–454.
33.
SongJLuZWeiP, et al. Global sensitivity analysis for model with random inputs characterized by probability-box. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2015; 229: 237–253.
34.
XiaoN-CLiYFYuL, et al. Saddlepoint approximation-based reliability analysis method for structural systems with parameter uncertainties. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2014; 228: 529–540.
35.
ZhangXLuZChengK, et al. A novel reliability sensitivity analysis method based on directional sampling and Monte Carlo simulation. Proc IMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2020; 234: 622–635.
Hoseini VaezSRMehanpourHFathaliMA.Reliability assessment of truss structures with natural frequency constraints using metaheuristic algorithms. J Build Eng2020; 28: 101065.
38.
FathiHHoseini VaezSRZhangQ, et al. A new approach for crack detection in plate structures using an integrated extended finite element and enhanced vibrating particles system optimization methods. Structures2021; 29: 638–651.
39.
KavehAHoseini VaezSRHosseiniP, et al. Heuristic operator for reliability assessment of frame structures. Period Polytechnica Civ Eng2021; 65: 702–716.
40.
KavehAHoseini VaezSRHosseiniP.Enhanced vibrating particles system algorithm for damage identification of truss structures. Sci Iran2017; 26: 246–256.
41.
LeeJ-OYangY-SRuyW-S.A comparative study on reliability-index and target-performance-based probabilistic structural design optimization. Comput Struct2002; 80: 257–269.
42.
LuoXGrandhiRV.Astros for reliability-based multidisciplinary structural analysis and optimization. Comput Struct1997; 62: 737–745.
43.
DedeTBekiroğluSAyvazY.Weight minimization of trusses with genetic algorithm. Appl Soft Comput2011; 11: 2565–2575.
44.
ToğanVDaloğluAT.An improved genetic algorithm with initial population strategy and self-adaptive member grouping. Comput Struct2008; 86: 1204–1218.
45.
DegertekinSO.Improved harmony search algorithms for sizing optimization of truss structures. Comput Struct2012; 92–93: 229–241.
46.
LambertiL.An efficient simulated annealing algorithm for design optimization of truss structures. Comput Struct2008; 86: 1936–1953.
47.
LiLJHuangZBLiuF.A heuristic particle swarm optimization method for truss structures with discrete variables. Comput Struct2009; 87: 435–443.
