The safety risk assessment of process industries can determine the degree of safety risk and remind or warn safety management personnel to take corresponding measures according to the probability of accidents. In this paper, hazard identification (HAZID) method is combined with fuzzy Petri net to construct a hybrid safety assessment system. Firstly, the fire risk factors of HAZID are determined according to the fire statistics data. By dividing the whole industrial process into four stages, the complex hazard sources in the factory are investigated item by item, thus the fuzzy Petri net of real-time risk assessment is constructed. Taking an acetic acid enterprise as a case, this paper introduces how to construct such a risk assessment system in detail, and the system can dynamically predict the risk with changes in process conditions. This also demonstrates the feasibility of this method, which can be used as a reference for related research.
HuangKChenGKhanF, et al. Dynamic analysis for fire-induced domino effects in chemical process industries. Process Saf Environ Prot2021; 148: 686–697.
2.
DingLKhanFGuoX, et al. A novel approach to reduce fire-induced domino effect risk by leveraging loading/unloading demands in chemical industrial parks. Process Saf Environ Prot2021; 146: 610–619.
3.
Al-shaniniAAhmadAKhanF. Accident modelling and analysis in process industries. J Loss Prev Process Ind2014; 32: 319–334.
4.
AbbasiTPasmanHJAbbasiSA. A scheme for the classification of explosions in the chemical process industry. J Hazard Mater2010; 174(1–3): 270–280.
5.
WangLLiWFengW, et al. Fire risk assessment for building operation and maintenance based on BIM technology. Build Environ2021; 205: 108188.
6.
YebraMDennisonPEChuviecoE, et al. A global review of remote sensing of live fuel moisture content for fire danger assessment: moving towards operational products. Remote Sens Environ2013; 136: 455–468.
7.
OuacheRBakhtavarEHuG, et al. Evidential reasoning and machine learning-based framework for assessment and prediction of human error factors-induced fire incidents. J Build Eng2022; 49: 104000.
8.
LuoYLiQJiangL, et al. Analysis of Chinese fire statistics during the period 1997–2017. Fire Saf J2021; 125: 103400.
9.
ChenCReniersG. Chemical industry in China: the current status, safety problems, and pathways for future sustainable development. Saf Sci2020; 128: 104741.
10.
SevincVKucukOGoltasM. A Bayesian network model for prediction and analysis of possible forest fire causes. Forest Ecol Manag2020; 457: 117723.
11.
ZhangY. Analysis on comprehensive risk assessment for urban fire: the case of Haikou city. Procedia Eng2013; 52: 618–623.
12.
AlvesDTSLimaGBA. Establishing an onshore pipeline incident database to support operational risk management in Brazil - Part 2: Bowtie proposition and statistics of failure. Process Saf Environ Prot2020; 135: 80–97.
13.
SquillanteRFo SantosDJMaruyamaN, et al. Modeling accident scenarios from databases with missing data: a probabilistic approach for safety-related systems design. Saf Sci2018; 104: 119–134.
14.
El-GherianiMKhanFChenD, et al. Major accident modelling using spare data. Process Saf Environ Prot2017; 106: 52–59.
15.
AzizAAhmedSKhanFI. An ontology-based methodology for hazard identification and causation analysis. Process Saf Environ Prot2019; 123: 87–98.
16.
McCoySAWakemanSJLarkinFD, et al. HAZID, A computer aid for hazard identification: 1. The Stophaz package and the Hazid code: an overview, the issues and the structure. Process Saf Environ Prot1999; 77: 317–327.
17.
NakayamaJSuzukiTOwadaS, et al. Qualitative risk analysis of the overhead hydrogen piping at the conceptual process design stage. Int J Hydrogen Energy2022; 47(22): 11725–11738.
18.
YazdiMHafeziPAbbassiR. A methodology for enhancing the reliability of expert system applications in probabilistic risk assessment. J Loss Prev Process Ind2019; 58: 51–59.
19.
YazdiM. Footprint of knowledge acquisition improvement in failure diagnosis analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int2019; 35: 405–422.
20.
LiWHeMSunY, et al. A novel layered fuzzy Petri nets modelling and reasoning method for process equipment failure risk assessment. J Loss Prev Process Ind2019; 62: 103953.
21.
WangXLuFZhouM, et al. A synergy-effect-incorporated fuzzy Petri net modeling paradigm with application in risk assessment. Expert Syst Appl2002; 199: 117037.
22.
YangBLiH. A novel dynamic timed fuzzy Petri nets modeling method with applications to industrial processes. Expert Syst Appl2018; 97: 276–289.
23.
ZhouJReniersG. Analysis of emergency response actions for preventing fire-induced domino effects based on an approach of reversed fuzzy Petri-net. J Loss Prev Process Ind2017; 47: 169–173.
24.
SolukloeiHRJNematifardSHesamiA, et al. A fuzzy-HAZOP/ant colony system methodology to identify combined fire, explosion, and toxic release risk in the process industries. Expert Syst Appl2022; 192: 116418.
25.
AhnJChangD. Fuzzy-based HAZOP study for process industry. J Hazard Mater2016; 317: 303–311.
26.
D’AngeloMFSVPalharesRMCosmeLB, et al. Fault detection in dynamic systems by a Fuzzy/Bayesian network formulation. Appl Soft Comput2014; 21: 647–653.
27.
YazdiMKabirS. A fuzzy Bayesian network approach for risk analysis in process industries. Process Saf Environ Prot2017; 111: 507–519.
28.
LiuYEckertCMEarlC. A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Syst Appl2020; 161: 113738.
29.
HuangPHuGZhong YongZ, et al. Fire risk assessment of battery transportation and storage by combining fault tree analysis and fuzzy logic. J Loss Prev Process Ind2022; 77: 104774.
30.
RamzaliNLavasaniMRMGhodousiJ. Safety barriers analysis of offshore drilling system by employing fuzzy event tree analysis. Saf Sci2015; 78: 49–59.
31.
KimKKangHKimY. Risk assessment for natural gas hydrate carriers: a hazard identification (HAZID) study. Energies2015; 8(4): 3142–3164.
32.
LowesmithBJHankinsonGChynowethS. Safety issues of the liquefaction, storage and transportation of liquid hydrogen: an analysis of incidents and HAZIDS. Int J Hydrogen Energy2014; 39(35): 20516–20521.
33.
DomínguezCRMaresJIPHernándezRGZ. Hazard identification and analysis in work areas within the manufacturing sector through the HAZID methodology. Process Saf Environ Prot2021; 145: 23–38.
34.
AjithSArumugaprabuVAjithV, et al. Hazard identification and risk assessment in firework industry. Mater Today Proc2022; 56: 1083–1085.
35.
SchmitzPReniersGSwusteP. Predicting major hazard accidents by monitoring their barrier systems: a validation in retrospective. Process Saf Environ Prot2021; 153: 19–28.
36.
GaoMHuangXWuZ. Fuzzy reasoning petri nets. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern2003; 30(2): 175–202.
37.
ChenSKeHChangJ. Knowledge representation using fuzzy Petri nets. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng1990; 2(3): 311–319.
38.
ChenS. Weighted fuzzy reasoning using weighted fuzzy Petri nets. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng2002; 14(2): 386–397.
39.
LiuHLiuLLinQ, et al. Knowledge acquisition and representation using fuzzy evidential reasoning and dynamic adaptive fuzzy Petri nets. IEEE Trans Cybern2013; 43(3): 1059–1072.
