The present work addresses the problem of estimating the defective proportion of Single-Shot-Devices under the Bayesian paradigm while taking failure cause information into account. In addition, the maximum likelihood estimation is also presented. The logit transformation is suggested to use for defective proportion parameter for better stability of the numerical maximum likelihood estimate. The same transformation is used for the posterior distribution. Since the posterior distribution becomes complex, we propose the use of Metropolis-Hastings method to draw the posterior samples and present posterior sample based inferences. Bayes estimation under several symmetric and asymmetric loss functions is presented in this work. Predictive posterior density of future failures is also derived. The prior distributions of the model parameters are assumed to follow specific functional forms. A comprehensive simulation study is conducted to examine the performance of the estimates in relation to sample size and model parameters. Our study demonstrates that integrating combined information on masking and defective proportions is crucial for parameter estimation. To demonstrate the practical application of our proposed methodology, we apply it to skin cancer data using the linear failure rate model as survival distribution.
ShangXNgHKTLingMH.On reliability analysis of one-shot devices with manufacturing defects. Qual Eng2023; 35(1): 79–94.
2.
FanTHBalakrishnanNChangCC.The Bayesian approach for highly reliable electro-explosive devices using one-shot device testing. J Stat Comput Simul2009; 79(9): 1143–1154.
3.
MorrisMD.A sequential experimental design for estimating a scale parameter from quantal life testing data. Technometrics1987; 29(2): 173–181.
4.
BalakrishnanNSoHYLingMH.EM algorithm for one-shot device testing with competing risks under exponential distribution. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2015; 137: 129–140.
5.
BalakrishnanNLingMH.Multiple-stress model for one-shot device testing data under exponential distribution. IEEE Trans Reliabil2012; 61(3): 809–821.
6.
BalakrishnanNCastillaE.EM-based likelihood inference for one-shot device test data under log-normal lifetimes and the optimal design of a CSALT plan. Qual Reliab Eng Int2022; 38(2): 780–799.
7.
ZhuXLiuKHeM, et al. Reliability estimation for one-shot devices under cyclic accelerated life-testing. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2021; 212: 107595.
8.
ZhuXLiuK.Reliability of one-shot device with generalized gamma lifetime under cyclic accelerated life-test. ProcIMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2022; 236(6): 1007–1023.
9.
BaghelSMondalS.Analysis of one-shot device testing data under logistic-exponential lifetime distribution with an application to seer gallbladder cancer data. Appl Math Model2024; 126: 159–184.
10.
AbbaBWangH.A new failure times model for one and two failure modes system: A Bayesian study with Hamiltonian monte Carlo simulation. ProcIMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2024; 238(2): 304–323.
11.
BalakrishnanNSoHYLingMH.EM algorithm for one-shot device testing with competing risks under Weibull distribution. IEEE Trans Reliabil2015; 65(2): 973–991.
12.
BalakrishnanNCastillaELingMH.Optimal designs of constant-stress accelerated life-tests for one-shot devices with model misspecification analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int2022; 38(2): 989–1012.
13.
BalakrishnanNJaenadaMPardoL.Non-destructive one-shot device test under step-stress experiment with lognormal lifetime distribution. J Comput Appl Math2024; 437: 115483.
14.
QiaoYGuiW.Inference for cumulative risk model under step-stress experiments and its application in nanocrystalline data. ProcIMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2023; 237(1): 195–209.
15.
SharmaRUpadhyayS.A hierarchical Bayes analysis for one-shot device testing experiment under the assumption of exponentiality. Commun Stat Simul Comput2018; 47(5): 1297–1314.
16.
Ashkamini SharmaRUpadhyaySK.Bayes analysis of one-shot device testing data with correlated failure modes using copula models. Commun Stat Simul Comput. Epub ahead of print 7December2023. DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2023.2288802.
17.
PrajapatiDLingMHShing ChanP, et al. Misspecification of copula for one-shot devices under constant stress accelerated life-tests. ProcIMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2023; 237(4): 725–740.
18.
YuC.Inference for gamma frailty models based on one-shot device data. McMaster University’s Institutional Repository. McMaster University's Institutional Repository, 2024http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29793.
19.
AziziFHaghighiFGhadiriE, et al. Statistical inference for masked interval data with Weibull distribution under simple step-stress test and tampered failure rate model. ProcIMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2017; 231(6): 654–665.
20.
FlehingerBJReiserBYashchinE.Inference about defects in the presence of masking. Technometrics1996; 38(3): 247–255.
21.
FlehtngerBJReiserBYashchinE.Survival with competing risks and masked causes of failures. Biometrika1998; 85(1): 151–164.
22.
BainLJ.Reliability test plans for one-shot devices based on repeated samples. Qual Control Appl Stat1992; 37(4): 223–226.
23.
GuikemaSDPaté-CornellME.Probability of infancy problems for space launch vehicles. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2005; 87(3): 303–314.
24.
BaghelSMondalS.A robust Bayesian approach for reliability prognosis of one-shot devices under cumulative risk model. arXiv preprint arXiv:240608867, 2024.
25.
BalakrishnanNCastillaE.Robust inference for destructive one-shot device test data under Weibull lifetimes and competing risks. J Comput Appl Math2024; 437: 115452.
26.
BaghelSMondalS.Robust inference of one-shot device testing data with competing risk under lindley lifetime distribution with an application to seer pancreas cancer data. arXiv preprint arXiv:230712557, 2023.
27.
BalakrishnanNCastillaEMartinN, et al. Power divergence approach for one-shot device testing under competing risks. J Comput Appl Math2023; 419: 114676.
28.
Castilla GonzálezEM. Robust statistical inference for one-shot devices based on divergences, Complutense University of Madrid, 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/5633
29.
Kodlin. A new response time distriblltion. Int Biom Soc1967; 23(2): 227–239.
30.
BainLJ.Analysis for the linear failure-rate life-testing distribution. Technometrics1974; 16(4): 551–559.
31.
SarhanAM.Parameter estimations in linear failure rate model using masked data. Appl Math Comput2004; 151(1): 233–249.
32.
SarhanAMKunduD.Generalized linear failure rate distribution. Commun Stat Theor Methods2009; 38(5): 642–660.
33.
NelderJ.A simplex algorithm for function minimization. Comput J1965; 7: 308–313.
34.
TakenagaSOzakiYOnishiM.Practical initialization of the Nelder–mead method for computationally expensive optimization problems. Optim Lett2023; 17(2): 283–297.
35.
HastingsWK.Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika1970; 57: 97–103
36.
SmithAFRobertsGO.Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain monte Carlo methods. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol1993; 55(1): 3–23.
37.
ZohRWilsonAVander WielS, et al. The negative log-gamma prior distribution for Bayesian assessment of system reliability. ProcIMechE, Part O: J Risk and Reliability2018; 232(3): 308–319.
38.
UpadhyaySVasishtaNSmithA.Bayes inference in life testing and reliability via Markov chain monte Carlo simulation. Sankhyā Indian J Stat Ser A2001; 63(1): 15–40.
39.
MiillerP.A generic approach to posterior integration and Gibbs sampling. Technical Report ; : 91–09, 1991.
40.
ChenMHShaoQM.Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat1999; 8: 69–92.
