/ Since its inception and subsequent diffusion, the Internet has been lauded as a potent democratizing agent. Using macro-level panel data from 1994 to 2003, this study examined 152 countries and found that increased Internet diffusion was a meaningful predictor of more democratic regimes. This was shown to be most true in developed countries, where non-linear fixed effects regression models showed the highest coefficient estimates and largest observed associations. Consistent with media system dependency theory, greater effects were also demonstrated for countries that already were at least partially democratic where the Internet was more prevalent and thus more likely to fulfill a greater number of information functions. In addition, Internet diffusion and democracy demonstrated a positive, statistically significant relationship (but with a marginal observed association size) in developing countries where the average level of sociopolitical instability was much higher. The Internet therefore should not be employed as a modern `mobility multiplier' because of the strong associations and positive relationships it has shown with democracy but it should also not be ignored due to the democratic potential these results suggest.
Althaus, S.L. and D. Tewksbury (2000) `Patterns of Internet and Traditional News Media Use in a Networked Community', Political Communication17: 21-45.
2.
Annual Report on American Journalism (2005 ) `The State of the News Media 2005'; at: www.stateofthemedia.org (accessed 10 October 2005).
3.
Arun, S., R. Heeks and S. Morgan (2004) `ICT Initiatives, Women, and Work in Developing Countries: Reinforcing or Changing Gender Inequalities in South India?', Development Informatics Working Paper20; at: www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/publications/wp/di/di_wp20.pdf (accessed 8 November 2005).
4.
Ball-Rokeach, S.J. (1998) `A Theory of Media Power and a Theory of Media Use: Different Stories, Questions, and Ways of Thinking', Mass Communication and Society 1(1/2): 5-40.
5.
Ball-Rokeach, S.J. and M.L. DeFleur (1976) `A Dependency Model of Mass-Media Effects', Communication Research3(1): 3-21.
6.
Beck, N. and J.N. Katz (1995) `What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data', The American Political Science Review89(3): 634-47.
7.
Best, M.L. and K.W. Wade (2005) `The Internet and Democracy: Global Catalyst or Democratic Dud?', The Berkman Center for Internet and Society Research; at: cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications (accessed 15 March 2006).
8.
Bieber, F. (2000) `Cyberwar or Sideshow? The Internet and the Balkan Wars', Current History99(635): 124-8.
9.
Bucy, E.P. and K.S. Gregson (2001) `Media Participation: A Legitimizing Mechanism of Mass Democracy', New Media and Society3(3): 357-80.
10.
Chan, F., T. Mancini-Griffoli and L.L. Pauwels (2006) `Stability Tests for Heterogeneous Panel Data' , Graduate Institute of International StudiesGeneva: Economics HEI Working Paper No: 24/2006.
11.
DeFleur, M.L. and S.J. Ball-Rokeach (1989) Theories of Mass Communication , 5th edn. White Plains, NY: Longman.
12.
Dimitrova, D.V. (2002) `Internet Diffusion in the Post-Communist Countries' , Medienjournal: Innovative Approaches to ICT Research (Vienna)64-71.
13.
Drew, D. and D.H. Weaver (2006) `Voter Learning and Interest in the 2004 Presidential Election: Did the Media Matter?', Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly83(1): 25-53.
14.
Fillip, B. (2005) `Local Entrepreneurial Skills and Sustainability in Rwanda's Community Internet Centers', Dot-Comments E Newsletter 12 July; at: www.dotcomalliance.org/newsletter/article.php?article_id=107 (accessed 22 October 2005).
15.
Freedom House (2005) `Freedom of the Press 2005'; at: www.freedomhouse.org/research/pressurvey.htm (accessed 10 November 2005).
16.
Gaynor, D. (1996) `Democracy in the Age of Information: A Reconception of the Public Sphere'; at: www.georgetown.edu/faculty/bassr/gaynor/intro.htm (accessed 24 November 2005).
17.
Gore, A. (1995) `Forging a New Athenian Age of Democracy', Intermedia22(2): 4-6.
18.
Haseloff, A. (2005) `Cybercafes and Their Potential as Community Development Tools in India', The Journal of Community Informatics1(3): 1-22.
19.
Hornik, R.C. (1988) Development Communication: Information, Agriculture, and Nutrition in the Third World. New York: Longman.
20.
International Telecommunications Union (2005 ) `United Nations Common Database'; at: unstats. un.org/unsd/cdb/cdb_help/cdb_quick_start.asp (accessed 30 October 2005).
21.
Kedzie, C. (1997) `Communication and Democracy: Coincident Revolutions and the Emergent Dictator's Dilemma', unpublished doctoral dissertation, RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA.
22.
Kedzie, C. (2002) `Coincident Revolutions and the Dictator's Dilemma' , pp 105-30 in J.E. Allison (ed.) Technology, Development, and Democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
23.
Lee, S. (1999) `Private Uses in Public Space: A Study of an Internet Café', New Media and Society1(3): 331-50.
24.
Lerner, D. (1958) The Passing of Traditional Society. New York: The Free Press.
25.
Lipset, S.M. (1959) `Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy', American Political Science Review53: 69-105.
26.
Lipset, S.M. (1994) `The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited' , American Sociological Review59: 1-22.
27.
Milner, H.V. (2006) `The Digital Divide: The Role of Political Institutions in Technology Diffusion', Comparative Political Studies39(2): 176-99.
28.
Muturi, N. (2005) `Communication for HIV/AIDS Prevention in Kenya: Social-Cultural Considerations', Journal of Health Communication10: 77-98.
29.
Mwesige, P.G. (2004) `Cyber Elites: A Survey of Internet Café Users in Uganda', Telematics and Informatics21(1): 83-101.
30.
Nie, N.H. and D.S. Hillygus (2002) `The Impact of Internet Use on Sociability: Time-Diary Findings', IT and Society1(1): 1-20.
31.
O'Loughlin, J., M.D. Ward, C.L. Lofdahl, J.S. Cohen, D.S. Brown, D. Reilly, K.S. Gleditsch and M. Shin (1998) `The Diffusion of Democracy', Annals of the Association of American Geographers88(4): 545-74.
32.
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B. and K. Lal (2005) `Internet Diffusion in Sub-Sahara Africa: A Cross Country Analysis', Telecommunications Policy29: 507-27.
33.
Persson, T. and G. Tabellini (2006) `Democracy and Development: The Devil in the Details' , National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 11993; at: www.iies.su.se/~perssont/papers/aea_ 06_jan10_final.pdf (accessed 30 March 2006).
34.
Pilat, D. and A.W. Wyckoff (2005) `The Impacts of ICT on Economic Performance: An International Comparison at Three Levels of Analysis', pp. 77-110 in W.H. Dutton, B. Kahin, R. O'Callaghan and A.W. Wyckoff (eds) Transforming Enterprise: The Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
35.
Polity IV (2002) `Polity IV Annual Time-Series Users' Manual'; at: www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm#data (accessed 25 October 2005).
36.
Polity IV (2003) `Polity IV Annual Time-Series Database'; at: www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm#data (accessed 25 October 2005); currently at: www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
37.
Robbins, M.B. (2002) `Are African Women Online Just ICT Customers?' , The International Communication Gazette64(3): 235-49.
38.
Rogers, E. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. New York: The Free Press .
39.
Rosenau, J.N. and D. Johnson (2002) `Information Technologies and Turbulence in World Politics', pp. 55-78 in J.E. Allison (ed.) Technology, Development, and Democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
40.
Roy, S. (2005) Globalisation, ICT, and Developing Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Rubin, A.M. and S. Windahl (1986) `The Uses and Dependency Model of MassCommunication' , Critical Studies in Mass Communication3(2): 184-99.
42.
Schwab, K. (2003) `Preface', pp. iii-iv in S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, and F. Paua (eds) The Global Information Technology Report 2002-2003. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
Sonaike, S.A. (2004) `The Internet and the Dilemma of Africa's Development' , The International Communication Gazette66(1): 41-61.
44.
Sood, S., M. Sengupta, P.R. Mishra and C. Jacoby (2004) `Come Gather Around Together: An Examination of Radio Listening Groups in Fulbari, Nepal', The International Communication Gazette66(1): 63-86.
45.
Stock, J.H. and M.W. Watson (2003) Introduction to Econometrics. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
46.
Sunstein, C.R. (2007) Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
Thornton, A. (2002) `Does Internet Create Democracy?', unpublished master's thesis, University of Technology, Sydney; at: www.zip.com.au/~athornto (accessed 23 October 2005).
48.
Tolbert, C.J. and R.S. McNeal (2003) `Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation?', Political Research Quarterly56(2): 175-85.
49.
United Nations (2003) Human Development Report. New York: United Nations .
50.
United Nations (2005) `United Nations Common Database'; at: unstats.un.org/unsd/cdb/cdb_help/cdb_quick_start.asp (accessed 30 October 2005).
51.
Weare, C. (2002) `The Internet and Democracy: The Causal Links between Technology and Policy', International Journal of Public Administration25(5): 659-91.
52.
Weaver, D.H. (1977) `The Press and Government Restriction: A Cross-National Study over Time', Gazette24(3): 152-70.
53.
Weaver, D.H., J.M. Buddenbaum and J.E. Fair (1985) `Press Freedom, Media, and Development, 1950-1979: A Study of 134 Nations', Journal of Communication35(2): 104-17.
54.
Wilson, E. (2004) The Information Revolution and Developing Countries . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
55.
World Bank (2005) `World Development Indicators Database'; at: econ.worldbank.org (accessed 12 November 2005).
