This article presents the results of a study conducted in Montreal (Canada) on how police use their power to release an accused on bail with conditions in incidents of domestic violence, which was granted to them in 1995. Interviews conducted in 2000 with police investigators and lieutenant-detectives revealed that police view this measure favourably. It allows them to release the accused on bail before his first appearance by monitoring him with conditions. According to police, this both reassures and protects the victim and avoids the need to detain the accused just to have conditions imposed by the court. While investigators found the decision to detain or release to be difficult at times, they also felt they were as capable as judicial officials in making the decision to release on bail. The police respondents explained why and how they are prudent in their assessment of the risks associated with release. Future research should evaluate to what degree the conditions they impose are adequate.
Bennett, L., L. Goodman and M.A. Dutton (1999) `Systemic Obstacles to the Criminal Prosecution of a Battering Partner: A Victim Perspective', Journal of Interpersonal Violence14(7): 761-72.
2.
Bucke, T. and D. Brown (1997) In Police Custody: Police Power and Suspects' Rights under the Revised PACE Codes of Practice. London: Home Office.
3.
Buzawa, E.S. and C.G. Buzawa (2003) Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response , 3rd edn. Los Angeles: SAGE.
4.
City of Montreal (2002) Recensement 2001 [2001 Census]. Montréal: Observatoire économique et urbain.
5.
Erez, E. and J. Belknap (1998) `In Their Own Words: Battered Women's Assessment of the Criminal Processing System's Responses', Violence and Victims13(3): 251-68.
6.
Fleury, R.E., C.M. Sullivan and D.I. Bybee (2000) `When Ending the Relationship Does Not End the Violence', Violence Against Women6(12): 1363-83.
7.
Gabias, M. and N. Jomphe (2000) `Procédures pour contraindre un individu à comparaître devant les tribunaux' [Procedures to Compel a Person to Appear Before the Courts], in M. Gabias, J. Blais, H. Carle , N. Jomphe, J. Lacoursière, Y. Lefebvre and P. Tremblay (eds) Droit pénal général et pouvoirs policiers: droit pénal III [General Criminal Law and Police Power: Criminal Law III], 4th edn, pp. 15-46. Quebec City, QC: Modulo.
8.
Gauthier, S. (2001) La violence conjugale devant la justice: conditions et contraintes de l'application de la loi [Domestic Violence Before the Courts: Conditions and Constraints in the Application of the Law]. Paris: L'Harmattan.
9.
Government of Quebec (1986a) Politique d'intervention en matière de violence conjugale [Domestic Violence Intervention Policy]. Quebec City, QC: Direction des communications. Ministère de la Justice et ministère du Solliciteur général.
10.
Government of Quebec (1986b) Rapport du comité d'étude sur les solutions de rechange à l'incarcération [Report of the Committee to Study Alternative Solutions to Incarceration] . Quebec City, QC: Direction des communications. Ministère du Solliciteur général.
11.
Government of Quebec. Comité interministériel de coordination en matière de violence conjugale et familiale (1995). Politique d'intervention en matière de violence conjugale: prévenir, dépister et contrer la violence conjugale [Domestic Violence Intervention Policy: Prevention, Screening, and Reducing Domestic Violence]. Quebec City, QC: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. Ministère de la Justice. Secrétariat à la Condition féminine. Ministère de la Sécurité publique. Ministère de l'éducation. Secrétariat à la Famille.
12.
Government of Quebec (2003) Statistiques 2002 sur la criminalité au Québec [2002 crime statistics for Quebec]. Sainte-Foy, QC: Direction des affaires policières et de la prévention de la criminalité. Ministère de la sécurité publique.
13.
Government of Quebec (2004) La violence conjugale. Statistiques 2002 [Domestic violence. 2002 Statistics] . Sainte-Foy, QC: Direction des affaires policières, de la prévention de la criminalité et des services de sécurité. Ministère de la sécurité publique.
14.
Government of Quebec (2008) 06-Montreal. Profiles of the Administrative Region. http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/regions/profils/region_06/region_06_00_an.htm (accessed 12 May 2007).
15.
Grosman, B. (1969) The Prosecutor: An Inquiry into the Exercise of Discretion. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
16.
Hoyle, C. and A. Sanders (2000) `Police Response to Domestic Violence: From Victim Choice to Victim Empowerment?', British Journal of Criminology40(1): 14-36.
17.
Hucklesby, A. (1994) `The Use and Abuse of Conditional Bail', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice33(3): 258-70.
18.
Hucklesby, A. (1997) `Remand Decision Makers', Criminal Law Review April: 269-81.
19.
Hucklesby, A. (2001) `Police Bail and the Use of Conditions', Criminal Justice1(4): 441-63.
20.
Hucklesby, A. and E. Marshall (2000) `Tackling Offending on Bail', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice39(2): 150-70.
21.
Kemshall, H. (2003) Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
22.
Morgan, P.M. and P.F. Henderson (1998) Remand Decisions and Offending on Bail: An Evaluation of the Bail Process Project. Home Office Research Study No. 184. London: Home Office.
23.
Packer, H.L. (1968) The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Standford, CA: Standford University Press.
24.
Raine, J.W. and M.J. Willson (1995a) Conditional Bail or Bail with Conditions: The Use and Effectiveness of Bail Conditions. Birmingham: Institute of Local Government Studies.
25.
Raine, J.W. and M.J. Willson (1995b) `Just Bail at the Police Station?', Journal of Law and Society22(4): 571-85.
26.
Raine, J.W. and M.J. Willson (1996) `The Imposition of Conditions in Bail Decisions: From Summary Punishment to Better Behaviour on Remand', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice35(3): 256-70.
27.
Raine, J.W. and M.J. Willson (1997) `Police Bail with Conditions: Perspectives on the Use, Misuse and Consequences of a New Police Power', British Journal of Criminology37(4): 593-607.
28.
Robinson, A. and D. Cook (2006) `Understanding Victim Retractation in Cases of Domestic Violence: Specialist Courts, Government Policy, and Victim-Centered Justice', Contemporary Justice Review9(2): 189-213.
Trotter, G.T. (1999) The Law of Bail in Canada. Toronto, ON: Carswell.
31.
Vallely, C., A. Robinson, M. Burton and J. Tregidga (2005) Evaluation of Domestic Violence Pilot Sites at Caerphilly (Gwent) and Croydon 2004/05. Final Report. London: Crown Prosecution Service.
32.
Williams, C. (1995) `New Bail Power for Custody Officers', New Law Journal145(6695): 685-6.
