Telecommunication and cyber fraud victimization among Chinese college students: An application of routine activity theory

Abstract

Analyzing survey data from 1037 college students in China, a country with the world’s largest number of Internet users and the world’s largest e-commerce market, the current study demonstrates that consistent with previous research, some routine telecom/cyber activities of Chinese college students predict higher odds of being targeted for telecom/cyber fraud, but online routines do not seem to predict the odds of completed victimization resulting in a financial loss. In contrast, the perceived presence of effective formal guardianship and target suitability exert a greater influence. These findings suggest that those previously and commonly used measures of routine activity theory are better suited for explaining attempted telecom/cyber fraud victimization, whereas completed victimization is chiefly predicted by target suitability such as risky/deviant online behaviors and low self-control.

Keywords

China cyber crime fraud routine activity victimization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auxier

Anderson

(2021) Social Media Use in 2021. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/ (accessed 25 March 2022).

Bossler

Holt

(2009) On-line activities, guardianship, and malware infection: An examination of routine activities theory. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 3(1): 400–420.

Chen

(2021) “You are in trouble!”: A discursive psychological analysis of threatening language in Chinese cellphone fraud interactions. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law / Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34(4): 1065–1092.

China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT) (2020) 新形势下电信网络诈骗治理研究报告 [Research report on telecom/cyber fraud intervention in evolving contexts]. Available at: http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/ztbg/202012/P020201218393889946295.pdf (accessed 25 March 2022).

China Daily (2022) Guizhou moving up economic rankings. 1 March. Available at: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202203/01/WS621d7c6ba310cdd39bc897a4.html

Choi

Kruis

Choo

(2021) Explaining fear of identity theft victimization using a routine activity approach. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 37(3): 406–426.

Choi

(2008) Computer crime victimization and integrated theory: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 2(1): 308–333.

Clarke

(2004) Technology, criminology and crime science. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 10(1): 55–63.

Cohen

Felson

(1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44: 588–608.

10.

Cramer-Flood

(2021a) In global historic first, ecommerce in China will account for more than 50% of retail sales. eMarketer. Available at: https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-historic-first-ecommerce-china-will-account-more-than-50-of-retail-sales (accessed 25 March 2022).

11.

Cramer-Flood

(2021b) Over 45% of China’s digital shoppers will buy via livestream in 2023. eMarketer. Available at: https://www.emarketer.com/content/over-45-of-china-s-digital-shoppers-will-buy-via-livestream-2023 (accessed 25 March 2022).

12.

Delisi

Hochstetler

Murphy

(2003) Self-control behind bars: A validation study of the Grasmick et al. scale. Justice Quarterly 20(2): 241–263.

13.

DeMaris

(2002) Explained variance in logistic regression: A Monte Carlo study of proposed measures. Sociological Methods & Research 31(1): 27–74.

14.

Elkin

(2022) Crime in England and Wales: Year Ending March 2022. Office of National Statistics. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2022#fraud (accessed 3 October 2022).

15.

Europol (2021) Telecommunication Fraud. Europol. Available at: europol.europa.eu/operations-services-and-innovation/public-awareness-and-prevention-guides/telecommunications-fraud (accessed 25 March 2022).

16.

Fan

(2021) Understanding aging and consumer fraud victimization in the Chinese context: A two-stage conceptual approach. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 33(3): 230–247.

17.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (2022) Internet Fraud. FBI. Available at: https://www.fbi.gov/scams-and-safety/common-scams-and-crimes/internet-fraud (accessed 25 March 2022).

18.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (2021) How America banks: Household use of banking and financial services. Available at: https://www.fdic.gov/analysis/household-survey/index.html (accessed 25 March 2022).

19.

Grasmick

Tittle

Bursik

Jr , et al. (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30(1): 5–29.

20.

Groff

(2007) Simulation for theory testing and experimentation: An example using routine activity theory and street robbery. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23(2): 75–103.

21.

Hagle

Mitchell

(1992) Goodness-of-fit measures for probit and logit. American Journal of Political Science 36: 762–784.

22.

Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) (2022) Internet Crime Report 2021. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Available at: https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2021_IC3Report.pdf (accessed 25 March 2022).

23.

Kemp

Miró-Llinares

Moneva

(2020) The dark figure and the cyber fraud rise in Europe: Evidence from Spain. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 26(3): 293–312.

24.

Lee

(2021) Online fraud victimization in China: A case study of Baidu Tieba. Victims & Offenders 16(3): 343–362.

25.

Leukfeldt

Yar

(2016) Applying routine activity theory to cybercrime: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Deviant Behavior 37(3): 263–280.

26.

Lewis

(2022) Internet Sales as a Percentage of Total Retail Sales (Ratio) (%). Office of National Statistics. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/retailindustry/timeseries/j4mc/drsi (accessed 3 October 2022).

27.

Milani

Caneppele

Burkhardt

(2022) Exposure to cyber victimization: Results from a Swiss survey. Deviant Behavior 43(2): 228–240.

28.

Newman

Clarke

(2013) Superhighway Robbery. Cullompton: Willan.

29.

Nguyen

(2020) Cybercrime in Vietnam: An analysis based on routine activity theory. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 14(1): 156–173.

30.

Partin

Meldrum

Lehmann

, et al. (2022) Low self-control and cybercrime victimization: An examination of indirect effects through risky online behavior. Crime & Delinquency 68: 2476–2502.

31.

Piquero

MacIntosh

Hickman

(2000) Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale. Criminology 38(3): 897–930.

32.

Pratt

Holtfreter

Reisig

(2010) Routine online activity and internet fraud targeting: Extending the generality of routine activity theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 47(3): 267–296.

33.

Pratt

Turanovic

Fox

, et al. (2014) Self-control and victimization: A meta-analysis. Criminology 52(1): 87–116.

34.

Reyns

(2013) Online routines and identity theft victimization: Further expanding routine activity theory beyond direct-contact offenses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 50(2): 216–238.

35.

Reyns

(2015) A routine activity perspective on online victimisation: Results from the Canadian General Social Survey. Journal of Financial Crime 22: 396–411.

36.

Reyns

Henson

(2016) The thief with a thousand faces and the victim with none: Identifying determinants for online identity theft victimization with routine activity theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 60(10): 1119–1139.

37.

Shi

(2008) The paradox of Confucian determinism: Tracking the root causes of intellectual property rights problem in China. The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law 7(3): 454–468.

38.

Stahura

Sloan

III (1988) Urban stratification of places, routine activities and suburban crime rates. Social Forces 66(4): 1102–1118.

39.

Taylor

Caeti

Loper

, et al. (2006) Digital Crime and Digital Terrorism. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

40.

The National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB) (2022) NFIB fraud and cyber crime dashboard – 13 months of data. Available at: https://colp.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/0334150e430449cf8ac917e347897d46 (accessed 1 October 2022).

41.

US Census Bureau (2022) E-commerce retail sales as a percent of total sales. Available at: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ECOMPCTSA (accessed 7 March 2022).

42.

Van Wilsem

(2011) Worlds tied together? Online and non-domestic routine activities and their impact on digital and traditional threat victimization. European Journal of Criminology 8(2): 115–127.

43.

Van Wilsem

(2013) “Bought it, but never got it” assessing risk factors for online consumer fraud victimization. European Sociological Review 29(2): 168–178.

44.

Vazsonyi

Mikuška

Kelley

(2017) It’s time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice 48: 48–63.

45.

Veall

Zimmermann

(1992) Pseudo-R²’s in the ordinal probit model. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 16(4): 333–342.

46.

Veall

Zimmermann

(1994) Evaluating Pseudo-R²’s for binary probit models. Quality and Quantity 28(2): 151–164.

47.

Von Abrams

(2021) These are the top global ecommerce markets. eMarketer. Available at: https://www.emarketer.com/content/top-global-ecommerce-markets (accessed 25 March 2022).

48.

Wang

(2021) 反诈专门立法，全面打响一场与电信网络诈骗的“攻防战 [Legislating against fraud: A “battle” against telecom/cyber fraud]. CCTV. Available at: https://news.cctv.com/2021/10/27/ARTINkh8kaKvZap9Igz5tSR8211027.shtml#:~:%20text=央视网消息（记者王莉莉,群众损失353.7亿元。 (accessed 23 January 2022).

49.

Windmeijer

(1995) Goodness-of-fit measures in binary choice models. Econometric Reviews 14(1): 101–116.

50.

(2022) Research on Offenders’ Decision-Making of New Cyberfraud Crime. Unpublished dissertation, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China.

51.

(2021) Research on the characteristics and countermeasures of cross-border telecom-network fraud: Based on 18 typical cases. Issues on Juvenile Crime and Delinquency 4: 88–103.

52.

Zhuang

(2020) 谁在直播电商平台“买买买”? [Who are buying on livestream ecommerce platforms?]. Available at: https://cloud.tencent.com/developer/article/1628777 (accessed 25 March 2022).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB