Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of Offender Management in Custody in women’s prisons in England and Wales
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of Offender Management in Custody in women’s prisons in England and Wales
Implementation of Offender Management in Custody (OMiC) in women’s prisons in England and Wales was introduced in April 2021. This article reports findings from a wider evaluation reviewing implementation of OMiC within the first 12 months. Using a Developmental Evaluation approach, data and evidence was gathered from all 12 women’s prisons in England and Wales. The Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to identify factors influencing the implementation process, within individual prisons and collectively across the women’s prison estate. Of the 39 constructs in the CFIR, 22 were identified as factors influencing implementation of OMiC. The CFIR has generated new learning and insights on how to improve existing practices and has helped to shape and target improvement strategies to support ongoing implementation of OMiC and to ultimately improve the outcomes for women in prison and their release back into the community.
AndrewsDABontaJ (2010) Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law16(1): 39.
2.
AndrewsDABontaJ (2014) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. New York: Routledge.
3.
AutyKMLieblingASchlieheA, et al. (2022) What is trauma-informed practice? Towards operationalisation of the concept in two prisons for women. Criminology & Criminal Justice23(5): 716–738.
4.
BowenE (2022) Understanding the Relationship and Communication Factors That Influence Positive Change in Prisons: Rapid Evidence Assessment of Reviews (Manuscript in preparation). London: HMPPS.
5.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health11(4): 589–597.
7.
CECAN (2017) Evaluation of complex policy and programs: A CECAN module for future policy analysts and evaluators (Version 1.0). Available at: www.cecan.ac.uk/resources (accessed 21 May 2019).
8.
CorstonBJ (2007) The Corston Report: A Report of a Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. London: Home Office.
9.
CovingtonS (2016) Becoming Trauma-Informed: A Training Programme for Criminal Justice Professionals (Participant Booklet UK). Berkeley, CA: Centre for Gender and Justice.
DamschroderLJAronDCKeithRE, et al. (2009) Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science4(1): 1–15.
12.
DurlakJADuPreEP (2008) Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology41(3): 327–350.
13.
EdmondsJ (2011) Managing successful change. Industrial and Commercial Training43(6): 349–353.
14.
FarmerM (2019) The Importance of Strengthening Female Offenders’ Family and Other Relationships to Prevent Reoffending and Reduce Intergenerational Crime. London: Ministry of Justice, pp. 176–191.
15.
Fitzalan HowardFGibsonRWakelingH (2023) Understanding Culture Change A Case Study of an English Prison. London: HMPPS.
GreenhalghTRobertGMacfarlaneF, et al. (2004) Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly82(4): 581–629.
18.
GrolRGrimshawJ (2003) From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients’ care. The Lancet362(9391): 1225–1230.
19.
GuijtIMKustersCSLLontH, et al. (2012) Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use (No. CDI-12-015). Wageningen: Wageningen UR Centre for Development Innovation.
20.
HannaJKubiakSPasmanE, et al. (2020) Evaluating the implementation of a prisoner re-entry initiative for individuals with opioid use and mental health disorders: Application of the consolidated framework for implementation research in a cross-system initiative. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment108: 104–114.
21.
HarrisMFallotRD (2001) Trauma-informed inpatient services. In: HarrisMFallotRD (eds) Using Trauma Theory to Design Service Systems: New Directions for Mental Health Services, No. 89, Spring 2001. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 33–46.
KavanaghMHAshkanasyNM (2006) The impact of leadership and change management strategy on organizational culture and individual acceptance of change during a merger. British Journal of Management17(Suppl. 1): 81–103.
28.
KelmanJPalmerLGribbleR, et al. (2024) Time and care: A qualitative exploration of prisoners’ perceptions of trauma-informed care in women’s prisons. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health23(4): 321–332.
29.
KemshallH (2019) A critical review of risk assessment policy and practice since the 1990s, and the contribution of risk practice to contemporary rehabilitation of offenders. In: McNeillFTaxmanFSUgwudikeP, et al. (eds) The Routledge Companion to Rehabilitative Work in Criminal Justice. London: Routledge, pp. 220–231.
30.
KingSHopkinsMCornishN (2018) Can models of organizational change help to understand ‘success’ and ‘failure’ in community sentences? Applying Kotter’s model of organizational change to an Integrated Offender Management case study. Criminology & Criminal Justice18(3): 273–290.
31.
MannR (2019) Rehabilitative culture part 2: An update on evidence and practice. Prison Service Journal224: 3–10.
32.
MannRFitzalan HowardFTewJ (2018) What is a rehabilitative prison culture?Prison Service Journal235: 3–9.
33.
MayCRJohnsonMFinchT (2016) Implementation, context and complexity. Implementation Science11: 1–12.
34.
McKeeGCoddMDempseyO, et al. (2017) Describing the implementation of an innovative intervention and evaluating its effectiveness in increasing research capacity of advanced clinical nurses: Using the consolidated framework for implementation research. BMC Nursing16: 21.
35.
McNeillFBurnettRMcCullochT (2010) Culture, change and community justice. Project Report. Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research, University of Glasgow.
PlsekPEGreenhalghT (2001) The challenge of complexity in health care. British Medical Journal323(7313): 625–628.
40.
PopeL (2024) Experiencing Offender Management in Custody (OMiC) in Prison: A Case Study Approach in Four Male Closed English Prisons. London: HMPPS.
41.
PopeL (2025) Implementation of Offender Management in Custody (OMiC) in the Women’s Prison Estate in England and Wales (Manuscript in preparation). London: HMPPS.
42.
RønningstadC (2018) Us and them: First-line management and change resistance. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies8(2): 5–22.
43.
VarsiCEkstedtMGammonD, et al. (2015) Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of an internet-based patient-provider communication service in five settings: A qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research17(11): e262.
44.
WiewioraASmidtMChangA (2019) The ‘how’ of multilevel learning dynamics: A systematic literature review exploring how mechanisms bridge learning between individuals, teams/projects and the organization. European Management Review16(1): 93–115.
45.
ZielinskiMJAllisonMKBrinkley-RubinsteinL, et al. (2020) Making change happen in criminal justice settings: Leveraging implementation science to improve mental health care. Health & Justice8: 1–10.
