The Office of Communications (Ofcom), established by an Act of Parliament in 2003, is a new sector wide regulator in the UK, required to further the interests of what has been termed the ‘citizen-consumer’. Using a critical discursive approach, this article charts the unfolding debate among stakeholders in the new regulatory environment as they attempt to define the interests of citizens, consumers and the citizen-consumer. Ofcom has preferred to align the terms ‘citizen’ and ‘consumer’ so that the interests of both may be met, as far as possible, through an economic agenda of market regulation. Among civil society groups, there is growing concern that the citizen interest is becoming marginalized as the consumer discourse becomes more widespread. We conclude by advocating the development of a positive definition of the citizen interests, distinct from the consumer interests, for the media and communications environment.
Billig, M. (1988) Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.
3.
Billig, M. (1999) ‘Whose Terms? Whose Ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversational Analysis’, Discourse and Society10(4): 543-558.
4.
Black, J., Lodge, M. and Thatcher, M. (2005) Regulatory Innovation: A Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
5.
Carter, S. (2003) Speech: The Communications Act: Myths and Realities, 9 September 2003. Available online at: [http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2003/10/carter_20031009], accessed 11 July 2005.
6.
Chapman, J., Miller, P. and Skidmore, P. (2003) The Long Game: How Regulators and Companies Can Both Win. Pamphlet. London: Demos. Available online at: [http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/thelonggame2], accessed 21 July 2006.
7.
Chiapello, E. and Fairclough, N. (2002) ‘Understanding the New Management Ideology: A Transdisciplinary Contribution from Critical Discourse Analysis and New Sociology of Capitalism’, Discourse & Society13(2): 185-208.
8.
Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
9.
Clarke, J., Smith, N. and Vidler, E. (in press) ‘Consumerism and the Reform of Public Services: Inequalities and Instabilities’, in M. Powell, K. Clarke and L. Bauld (eds) Social Policy Review, vol. 17. Bristol: The Policy Press.
10.
Cohen, J. L. and Arato, A. (1994) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Collins, R. and Murroni, C. (1996) New Media, New Policies: Media and Communications Strategies for the Future. Cambridge: Polity.
12.
Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D. and Crewe, I. (2004) ‘The Elusive Ideal of Equal Citizenship: Political Theory and Political Psychology in the United States and Great Britain’, Journal of Politics66(4): 1036-1068.
13.
Currie, D. (2003) Speech to the English National Forum Seminar, 7 July 2003. Available online at: [http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2003/07/currie_20030707], accessed 29 December 2005.
14.
Dowding, K. and John, P. (2006) ‘The Three Exit, Three Voice, and Loyalty Model: A Test with Survey Data on Local Services’, paper for the Political Studies Association meeting, Reading, April.
15.
Fairclough, N. (2002) ‘Language in New Capitalism’, Discourse & Society13(2): 163-166.
16.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, in T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 258-285. London: Sage.
17.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Oxford: Polity.
18.
Goodwin, I. and Spittle, S. (2002) The European Union and the Information Society: Discourse, Power and Policy’, New Media & Society4(2): 225-249.
19.
Graber, D. (2004) ‘Mediated Politics and Citizenship in the Twenty-first Century’, Annual Review of Psychology55: 545-571.
20.
Habermas, J. (1997) Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.
22.
Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.
23.
Kezar, A. (2003) ‘Transformational Elite Interviews: Principles and Problems’, Qualitative Inquiry9(3): 395-415.
24.
Kress, G. R. and Hodge, B (1979) Language as Ideology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
25.
Livingstone, S. (ed.) (2005) Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere. Bristol: Intellect Press.
26.
Livingstone, S., Lunt, P. and Miller, L. (in press) ‘Citizens and Consumers: Discursive Debates During and After the Communications Act 2003’, Media, Culture & Society.
27.
Lunt, P., Livingstone, S. and Kelay, T. (2005) ‘Risk and Regulation in Financial Services and Communications’, SCARR Working Paper Series. Available online at: [http://www.kent.ac.uk/scarr/events/papers/luntlivingstonekelay.pdf], accessed 4 January 2006.
28.
Lunt, P., Livingstone, S., Kelay, T. and Miller, L. (2006) ‘Approaches to Risk and Consumer Policy in Financial Service Regulation in the UK’Forum Qualitative Social Research7(1), Art. 32. Available online at: [http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/a5b6c7/06-1-32-e.htm], accessed 29 August 2006.
29.
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working With Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause, London and New York: Continuum.
30.
Mouffe, C. (1992) ‘Democratic Citizenship and the Political Community’, in C. Mouffe (ed.) Dimensions of Radical Democracy, pp. 225-239. London: Verso.
31.
Mumby, D. K. and Clair, R. P. (1997) ‘Organizational Discourse’, in T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 181-205. London: Sage.
32.
Murdock, G. (2005) ‘Public Broadcasting and Democratic Culture: Consumers, Citizens, and Communards’, in J. Wasko (ed.) A Companion to Television, pp. 174-198. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
33.
Needham, C. (2003) Citizen-Consumers: New Labour’s Marketplace Democracy. London: Catalyst Forum.
34.
Odendahl, T. and Shaw, A. (2002) ‘Interviewing Elites’, in J. Gubrium and J. Holstein (eds) Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Methodology, pp. 299-316. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
(Special Issue: J. Lloyd and J. Seaton [eds] ‘What Can Be Done? Making the Media and Politics Better’).
36.
Richards, E. (2003) Speech to the Royal Television Society Dinner, 4 December 2003. Available online at: [http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2003/12/richards_20031204], accessed 2 September 2005.
37.
Sarangi, S. and Slembrouck, S. (1996) Language, Bureaucracy, and Social Control. London: Longman.
38.
Scannell, P. (1989) ‘Public Service Broadcasting and Modern Public Life’, Media Culture & Society11: 135-166.
39.
Spencer-Oatey, F. (2000) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. London/New York: Continuum.
40.
The Report of the Joint Committee on the Draft Communications Bill (2002) House of Commons and House of Lords, 25 July. London: The Stationery Office.
41.
van Dijk, T. A. (1993) ‘Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis’, Discourse and Society4(2): 249-283.
42.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997) Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.
43.
van Eemeren, F., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. and Jacobs, S. (1997) ‘Argumentation’, in T. A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process, pp. 208-230. London: Sage.
44.
van Leeuwen, T. (1993) ‘Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis: A Synopsis’, Discourse and Society4(2): 193-223.
45.
van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The Representation of Social Actors’, in M. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 32-70. London: Routledge.
46.
Walton, D. N. (1989) Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Williams, K. (1989) Researching the Powerful: Problems and Possibilities of Social Research’, Crime Law and Social Change13(3): 253-274.
