This article considers whether using leadership language may be one under-explored reason why there continues to be a significant lack of women at executive level. Do women make less of a linguistic impact in the boardroom than men? By analysing linguistic data from senior management meetings and follow-up interviews in seven multinational UK companies, we suggest that senior women and men use a very similar range of linguistic strategies to lead their teams except in one key respect. Women appear to monitor and regulate their use of language more than men, adjusting what they say in the light of their colleagues’ concerns and agendas. This use of ‘double-voiced discourse’ (Bakhtin, 1994/1963) enables women to survive in a male-dominated business world, but this can sometimes make their voice ‘harder to hear’. However, double-voiced discourse is also a form of linguistic expertise and potentially might offer women leaders a strategy for success.
Angouri J. (in press) ‘We are in a masculine profession . . .’: Doing gender in a consortium of two multinational engineering companies. Gender and Language, Special issue on ‘Gender and Language in the Workplace’ (ed. L. Mullany ) 4(2).
2.
Bakhtin M. ( 1994) Double-voiced discourse in Dostoevsky. In: Morris P (ed.) The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings. London: Edward Arnold , 102-111. (Original published 1963.)
3.
Bargiela-Chiappini F and Nickerson C (eds) (1999) Writing Business: Genres, Media and Discourses. Harlow: Longman.
4.
Baxter J. ( 2003) Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
5.
Baxter J. ( 2008) Is it all tough talking at the top? A post-structuralist analysis of the construction of gendered speaker identities of British business leaders within interview narratives. Gender and Language2(2): 197-222.
6.
Baxter J. ( 2010) The Language of Female Leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
Bell A. ( 1984) Language style as audience design. Language and Society13: 145-204.
8.
Cameron D. ( 2006) Theorizing the female voice in public contexts . In: Baxter J (ed.) Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 3-20.
9.
Coupland N. ( 2007) Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Denzin NK and Lincoln SL ( 2000) The discipline and practice of qualitative research . In: Denzin NK and Lincoln SL (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2nd edn. London: SAGE, 1-29.
11.
Eagleton T. ( 1983) Literary Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
Eagly A. and Carli L. ( 2007) Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13.
Fishman P. ( 1978) Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems25(4): 397-406.
14.
Fletcher JK ( 1999) Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power and Relational Practice at Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
15.
Giles H. and Coupland N. ( 1991) Language: Contexts and Consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
16.
Glaser BG ( 1998) Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
17.
Handford M. ( 2010) The Language of Business Meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Holmes J. ( 2006) Gendered Talk at Work. Oxford : Blackwell.
19.
Kanter RM ( 1993) Men and Women of the Corporation, 2nd edn. New York: Basic Books. (Original published 1977.)
20.
Kets de Fries Mfr, Vrignaud P., Agrawal P. and Florent-Treacy E. ( 2010) Development and application leadership archetype questionnaire . International Journal of Human Resource Management21(15): 2848-2863.
21.
Koller V. ( 2004) Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse . Basingstoke: Palgrave.
22.
Labov W. ( 1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City . Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
23.
Mullany L. ( 2007) Gendered Discourse in Professional Communication . Basingstoke: Palgrave.
24.
Rampton B. ( 1995) Crossing. London: Longman.
25.
Schein VE ( 2007) Women in management: Reflections and projections . Women in Management Review22(1): 6.
26.
Schiffrin D. ( 1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford : Blackwell Publishing.
27.
Schnurr S. ( 2008) Leadership Discourse at Work. Interactions of Humour, Gender and Workplace Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
28.
Sheldon A. ( 1992) Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic challenges to self-assertion and how young girls meet them. Merrill Palmer Quarterly38(1): 95-117.
29.
Silverman D. ( 2000) Analysing talk and text. In: Denzin NK and Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. London: SAGE, 821-835.
30.
Swann J. ( 2002) Yes, but is it gender? In: Litosseliti L and Sunderland J (eds) Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43-67.
31.
Terjesen S., Sealy R. and Singh V. ( 2009) Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review17(3): 320-337.
32.
Van Dijk T. ( 2001) Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In: Wodak R and Meyer M (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, 95-120.
33.
Vinnicombe S., Sealy R., Graham J. and Doldor E. ( 2010) The Female FTSE Board Report 2010. Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield, UK.
34.
Wodak R. ( 1997) ‘I know we won’t revolutionise the world with this but . . .’: Styles of female leadership in institutions . In: Kotthoff H and Wodak R (eds) Communication Gender in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 335-370.
