Artificial intelligence,deepfakes,and wars: How global news media frame actors,threats,and solutions in 19 countries

Abstract

This study analyzes 308 news articles published by 19 newspapers across 19 countries to examine the actors behind deepfakes, the associated threats, and the proposed solutions. Using the Russia–Ukraine war as a case study, the authors examined how newspapers frame deepfake-related actors, threats, and solutions during the conflict. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to analyze the data, and framing theory to interpret the findings. Findings reveal that the actors responsible for creating, distributing, and supporting deepfakes include state and political entities, technology companies and developers, criminal networks, covert channels, and propaganda agents. The threats posed by deepfakes span political, ethical, legal, social, security, and economic domains. Proposed solutions to counter deepfakes fall into several categories: technical, policy-based, regulatory, institutional, and educational. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on modern warfare, AI-generated disinformation, deepfakes, and the rapidly changing digital information ecosystem in the post-truth era.

Keywords

AI-generated disinformation deepfakes information warfare media framing Ukraine war

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alanazi

Asif

Caird-Daley

, et al. (2025) Unmasking deepfakes: A multidisciplinary examination of social impacts and regulatory responses. Human-Intelligent Systems Integration 7: 131–153. DOI: 10.1007/s42454-025-00060-4.

Benkler

Faris

Roberts

(2018) Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford University Press.

Birrer

Just

(2024) What we know and don’t know about deepfakes: An investigation into the state of the research and regulatory landscape. New Media & Society 27(12): 6819–6838. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241253138.

Bontridder

Poullet

(2021) The role of artificial intelligence in disinformation. Data & Policy 3: e32. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.20.

Bösch

Divon

(2024) The sound of disinformation: TikTok, computational propaganda, and the invasion of Ukraine. New Media & Society 26(9): 5081–5106. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241251804.

Boyd-Barrett

(2017) Ukraine, mainstream media, and conflict propaganda. Journalism Studies 18(8): 1016–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1099461.

Bradshaw

Elswah

Haque

, et al. (2024) Strategic storytelling: Russian state-backed media coverage of the Ukraine War. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 36(3): edae028. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edae028.

Brantner

Saurwein

(2021) Covering technology risks and responsibility: Automation, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms in the media. International Journal of Communication 15: 5074–5098.

Braun

Eklund

(2019) Fake news, real money: Ad tech platforms, profit-driven hoaxes, and the business of journalism. Digital Journalism 7(1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1556314.

10.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

11.

Broinowski

(2022) Deepfake nightmares, synthetic dreams: A review of dystopian and utopian discourses around deepfakes, and why the collapse of reality may not be imminent—yet. Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture 7(1): 109–139.

12.

Byman

Gao

Meserole

, et al. (2023) Deepfakes and International Conflict, 8. Brookings Institution. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/deepfakes-and-international-conflict/ (accessed 11 March 2026)

13.

Chadwick

Stanyer

(2022) Deception as a bridging concept in the study of disinformation, misinformation, and misperceptions: Toward a holistic framework. Communication Theory 32(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab019.

14.

Chapagain

Kshetri

Aryal

(2024) Deepfake disasters: A comprehensive review of technology, ethical concerns, countermeasures, and societal implications. In: International Conference on Emerging Trends in Networks and Computer Communications (ETNCC). 2024. Windhoek, Namibia: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETNCC63262.2024.10767452.

15.

Charmaz

(2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. SAGE.

16.

Chesney

Citron

(2019) Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review 107(6): 1753–1820. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38RV0D15J.

17.

Christopher

(2020) We’ve just seen the first use of deepfakes in an Indian election campaign. VICE News. Available at: https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-first-use-of-deepfakes-in-indian-election-by-bjp/ (accessed 11 March 2026).

18.

Clinton

Doumit

Ezzeddine

, et al. (2020) Using frame analysis to re-analyse the results of inductive thematic analysis: A methodological discussion of investigating meanings and learning contexts in baccalaureate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 76(11): 3204–3212. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14485.

19.

Cohen

(2022) A surge of unifying moral outrage over Russia’s war. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/01/world/europe/zelensky-ukraine-war-outrage.html (accessed 11 March 2026).

20.

De Witte

(2022) News about the conflict in Ukraine has been different: Stanford scholar and former war journalist discusses why. Stanford News. Available at: https://news.stanford.edu/2022/03/17/reporting-war-ukraine/

21.

Eadicicco L (2019) There’s a fake video showing Mark Zuckerberg saying he’s in control of ‘billions of people’s stolen data,’ as Facebook grapples with doctored videos that spread misinformation. Business Insider. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/deepfake-video-mark-zuckerberg-instagram-2019-6 (accessed 11 March 2026).

22.

Entman

(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.

23.

Espindola

(2023) Facial recognition in war contexts: Mass surveillance and mass atrocity. Ethics & International Affairs 37(2): 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679423000151.

24.

European Digital Media Observatory (2025). The fact-checked disinformation detected in the EU. Available at: https://edmo.eu/thematic-areas/war-in-ukraine/the-fact-checked-disinformation-detected-in-the-eu/ (accessed 11 March 2026).

25.

Gosse

Burkell

(2020) Politics and porn: How news media characterize problems presented by deepfakes. Critical Studies in Media Communication 37(5): 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2020.1832697.

26.

Hameleers

(2025) The visual nature of information warfare: The construction of partisan claims on truth and evidence in the context of wars in Ukraine and Israel/Palestine. Journal of Communication 75(2): 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae045.

27.

Hynek

Gavurova

Kubak

(2025) Risks and benefits of artificial intelligence deepfakes: Systematic review and comparison of public attitudes in seven European Countries. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 10(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100782.

28.

Ittefaq

Zain

Arif

, et al. (2025) Global news media coverage of artificial intelligence (AI): A comparative analysis of frames, sentiments, and trends across 12 countries. Telematics and Informatics 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102223.

29.

Kietzmann

Lee

McCarthy

, et al. (2020) Deepfakes: Trick or treat? Business Horizons 63(2): 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006.

30.

Kuźnicka-Błaszkowska

Kostyuk

(2025) Emerging need to regulate deepfakes in international law: The Russo–Ukrainian war as an example. Journal of Cybersecurity 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyaf008.

31.

Zhao

(2024) ‘It’s up to me whether I do—or don’t—watch deepfakes’: Deepfakes and behavioral intention. SAGE Open 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241302282.

32.

Linström

Marais

(2012) Qualitative news frame analysis: A methodology. Communitas 17: 21–38. https://doi.org/10.38140/com.v17i0.991.

33.

Liu

(2024) News framing of the 2014–15 Ukraine conflict by the BBC and RT. International Communication Gazette 86(4): 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485231158904.

34.

Mallick

(2024) Artificial intelligence, national security and the future of warfare. In: Roy

(ed.) Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and the Future of Warfare. Routledge India, 30–70.

35.

Maras

M-H

Alexandrou

(2019) Determining authenticity of video evidence in the age of artificial intelligence and in the wake of deepfake videos. International Journal of Evidence & Proof 23(3): 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712718807226.

36.

McGee

Princewill

(2022) World leaders respond to Ukraine invasion, as fresh sanctions await Russia. CNN. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/24/europe/global-response-to-russia-ukraine-intl (accessed 11 March 2026).

37.

Morgan

(2018) Fake news, disinformation, manipulation and online tactics to undermine democracy. Journal of Cyber Policy 3(1): 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2018.1462395.

38.

Niklewicz

(2017) Weeding out fake news: An approach to social media regulation. European View 16(2): 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0468-0.

39.

Norström

(2019) The Coverage of the Russian Ukrainian Conflict by the Polish Media (2014–2015). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/B15629.

40.

Nygren

Glowacki

Hök

, et al. (2018) Journalism in the crossfire: Media coverage of the war in Ukraine in 2014. Journalism Studies 19(7): 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1251332.

41.

Oleinik

(2024) War propaganda effectiveness: A comparative content-analysis of media coverage of the first two months of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Atlantic Journal of Communication 32(4): 526–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2023.2187801.

42.

Omoera

Nwaoboli

(2023) Sahara Reporters and Premium Times online coverage of the Russia–Ukraine war. Online Media and Global Communication 2(2): 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-0022.

43.

Paterson

Hanley

(2020) Political warfare in the digital age: Cyber subversion, information operations and ‘deepfakes’. Australian Journal of International Affairs 74(4): 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1734772.

44.

Ptaszek

Yuskiv

Khomych

(2024) War on frames: Text mining of conflict in Russian and Ukrainian news agency coverage on Telegram during the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Media, War & Conflict 17(1): 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231166327.

45.

Rojecki

Meraz

(2016) Rumors and factitious informational blends: The role of the web in speculative politics. New Media & Society 18(1): 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535724.

46.

Schwalbe

Silcock

Keith

(2008) Visual framing of the early weeks of the US-led invasion of Iraq: Applying the master war narrative to electronic and print images. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52(3): 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802205702.

47.

Soto-Sanfiel

(2025) How audiences make sense of deepfake resurrections: A multilevel analysis of realism, ethics, and cultural meaning. Computers in Human Behavior 174: 108822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108822.

48.

Sun

Zhai

Shen

, et al. (2020) Newspaper coverage of artificial intelligence: A perspective of emerging technologies. Telematics and Informatics 53: 101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101433.

49.

Tahamtan

Potnis

Mohammadi

, et al. (2021) Framing of and attention to COVID-19 on Twitter: Thematic analysis of hashtags. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23(9): e30800. https://doi.org/10.2196/30800.

50.

Twomey

Ching

Aylett

, et al. (2023) Do deepfake videos undermine our epistemic trust? A thematic analysis of tweets that discuss deepfakes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine. PLoS One 18(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291668.

51.

Vaccari

Chadwick

(2020) Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408.

52.

Verbytska

(2024) Topic modelling as a method for framing analysis of news coverage of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022–2023. Language & Communication 99: 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2024.10.004.

53.

Whittaker

Mulcahy

Letheren

, et al. (2023) Mapping the deepfake landscape for innovation: A multidisciplinary systematic review and future research agenda. Technovation 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102784.

54.

Wozniak

Liu

Lind

(2024) Media coverage of the Russo–Ukraine war beyond the West: Geopolitics and mainstream news in Brazil, India, and South Africa. Media, War & Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352241302244.

55.

Young

Omosun

(2025) How does it look from where you are? A visual media framing analysis of the 2022 war in Ukraine. Digital Journalism 13(1): 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2296560.