This article is an examination of the comments attached to a video upload on YouTube of a Chilean television mini-series on the War of the Pacific (1879–84), one of Latin America’s rare international wars, which pitted Chile against Peru and Bolivia, and which in many ways remains an open historical wound. Posted by anonymous commentators whose national subject positions as Chileans, Peruvians, Bolivians and Argentines are nevertheless discernable, the comments offer a compelling perspective on the ways in which digital artefacts such as YouTube enable the circulation and reproduction of collective memories in de-territorialized and transnational ways. However, the analysis of these comments suggests that the operation of memory in global virtual spaces does not guarantee or even necessarily enable the unmooring of memory from the national. In fact, the evidence presented here suggests that global spaces such as YouTube may contribute to the strengthening of national, and indeed, nationalist memories.
AmayoE (1988) La política británica en la Guerra del Pacífico. Lima: Editorial Horizonte.
2.
BasadreJBonillaHMolinariBCCisnerosLJGieseckeMKapsoliWMaceraPManriqueNJarrínEMPásaraLTauro del PinoAYrigoyenJ (1979) Reflexiones en torno a la Guerra de 1879. Lima: CIC.
3.
BeckmanE (2009) The creolization of imperial reason: Chilean state racism in the War of the Pacific. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies18(1): 73–90.
4.
BenklerY (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
BoellstorffT (2008) Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6.
BonillaH (1978) The War of the Pacific and the national and colonial problem in Peru. Past and Present81: 92–118.
7.
Chaupis TorresJRosarioE (eds) (2007) La Guerra del Pacífico, Vol. 1. Lima: Editorial Línea Andina/Fondo Editorial de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales UNMSM.
8.
ClunyCM (2008) Atacama. Ensayo sobre la guerra del Pacífico, 1879–1883. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
9.
DrinotP (2009) For whom the eye cries: Memory, monumentality, and the ontologies of violence in Peru. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies18(1):15–32.
10.
EriksenTH (2007) Nationalism and the internet. Nations and Nationalism13: 1–17.
11.
FarcauBW (2000) The Ten Cents War: Chile, Peru, and Bolivia in the War of the Pacific, 1879–1884. Westport CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
12.
FergusonJ (2003) Stillborn chrysalis: Reflections on the fate of national culture in neoliberal Zambia. Global Networks3(3): 271–97.
13.
FrazierLJ (2007) Salt in the Sand: Memory, Violence, and the Nation-State in Chile, 1890 to the Present. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14.
GarcíaMELuceroJA (2008) Exceptional others: Politicians, rottweilers, and alterity in the 2006 Peruvian elections. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies3(3): 233–70.
15.
GrandinGKlubockTM (eds) (2007) Truth commissions: State terror, history and memory. Radical History Review (97) (whole issue).
16.
GutiérrezH (2010) Exaltación del mestizo: La invención del roto chileno. Revista Universum25(1): 123–39.
17.
HebelUJ (2009) Transnational American Memories. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
18.
HiteK (2007) The eye that cries: The politics of representing victims in contemporary Peru. A Contracorriente5(1): 108–34.
19.
HuyssenA (2000) Present pasts: Media, politics, amnesia. Public Culture12(1): 21–38.
20.
JelinE (2001) Los trabajos de la memoria. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
21.
JelinE (2003) State Repression and the Labors of Memory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
KansteinerW (2002) Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies. History and Theory41: 179–97.
23.
KlaiberJ (1978) Los cholos y los rotos: Actitudes raciales durante la Guerra del Pacífico. Histórica2(1): 27–37.
24.
KleinKL (2000) On the emergence of memory in historical discourse. Representations69: 127–50.
25.
LangePG (2007) Publicly private and private public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1). Available at: jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/lange.html.
LevyDSznaiderN (2002) Memory unbound: The Holocaust and the formation of cosmopolitan memory. European Journal of Social Theory5(1): 87–106.
28.
MallonF (1983) The Defense of Community in Peru’s Central Highlands, Peasant Struggle and Capitalist Transitions, 1860–1940. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29.
MallonF (1995) Peasant and Nation: The Making of Postcolonial Mexico and Peru. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
MallonF (2005) Courage Tastes of Blood: The Mapuche Community of Nicolás Ailío and the Chilean State, 1906–2001. Dirham, NC: Duke University Press.
31.
ManriqueN (1981) Las guerrillas indígenas en la Guerra con Chile. Lima: CIC.
32.
McCrayDA (2005) Eternal ramifications of the War of the Pacific. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Florida, USA.
33.
McEvoyC (2004) De la mano de Dios. El nacionalismo católico chileno y la Guerra del Pacífico, 1879–1881. Histórica28(2): 83–136.
34.
McEvoyC (2006) Chile en el Perú: Guerra y construcción estatal en Sudamérica, 1881–1884. Revista de Indias66(236): 195–216.
35.
McEvoyC (2010) Armas de persuasión masiva: Retórica y ritual en la Guerra del Pacífico. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Centro de Estudios Bicentenario.
36.
MéndezC (1996) Incas sí, Indios no: Notes on Peruvian creole nationalism and its contemporary crisis. Journal of Latin American Studies28(1): 197–225.
37.
MiltonCE (2007) At the edge of the Peruvian Truth Commission: Alternative paths to recounting the past. Radical History Review98: 3–33.
38.
NakamuraL (2002) Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. London: Routledge.
39.
NoraP (1989) Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire. Representations26: 7–24.
40.
OlickJKRobbinsJ (1998) Social memory studies: From ‘collective memory’ to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology24: 105–40.
41.
RichardsP (2010) Of Indians and terrorists: How the state and local elites construct the Mapuche in neoliberal multicultural Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies42(1): 59–90.
42.
Rosas LauroC (2009) El odio y el perdón en el Perú, siglos XVI al XXI. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
43.
RothbergM (2009) Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
SaterWF (2007) Andean Tragedy: Fighting the War of the Pacific, 1879–1884. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
45.
SchwenkelC (2009) The American War in Contemporary Vietnam: Transnational Remembrance and Representation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
46.
SkubanW (2007) Lines in the Sand: Nationalism and Identity on the Peruvian-Chilean Frontier. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
47.
SznajderM (1998) Who is a Chilean? The Mapuche, the Huaso and the Roto as the basic symbols of Chilean collective identity. In RonigerLSznajderM (eds) Constructing Collective Identities and Shaping Public Spheres: Latin American Paths. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 199–216.
48.
SternSJ (ed.) (1987) Resistance, Rebellion, and Consciousness in the Andean Peasant World, 18th to 20th Centuries. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
49.
SternSJ (2004) Remembering Pinochet’s Chile: On the eve of London 1998. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
SternSJ (2006) Battling for Hearts and Minds: Memory Struggles in Pinochet’s Chile, 1973–1988. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
51.
TrinkleDA (1998) Writing, Teaching and Researching History in the Electronic Age: Historians and Computers. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
52.
WilsonSMPetersonLC (2002) The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology31: 449–67.
53.
WhiteGM (1995) Remembering Guadalcanal: National identity and transnational memory-making. Public Culture7(3): 529–55.
