Early secondary transfer and specialist care may offer a survival benefit for head injury patients with non-surgical lesions initially admitted to non-specialist intensive care units. However, results must be interpreted with caution due to a high risk of bias.
Level of evidence: 1B−, an individual cohort study with wide confidence intervals
References
1.
HeitjanDF. Incomplete data: what you don't know might hurt you. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2011;20: 1567–70.
2.
WilsonJTEdwardsPFiddesHReliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma2002;19: 999–1005.
3.
HeinzeGJüniP. An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses. Eur Heart J2011;32: 1704–08.
4.
WunschHLinde-ZwirbleWTAngusDC. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data. J Crit Care2006;21: 1–7.
5.
PatelHCBouamraOWoodfordMTrends in head injury outcome from 1989 to 2003 and the effect of neurosurgical care: an observational study. Lancet2005;366: 1538–44.
6.
FullerGLawrenceTWoodfordMLeckyF. The accuracy of alternative triage rules for identification of significant traumatic brain injury: a diagnostic cohort study. Emerg Med J2013; doi:10.1136/emermed-2013-202575. Published online first 12 Aug 2013.
7.
PetsasAWaldmannC. Where should patients with severe traumatic brain injury be managed?: Patients can be safely managed in a nonspecialist center. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol2010;22: 354–56.
8.
TeigMSmithM. Where should patients with severe traumatic brain injury be managed? All patients should be managed in a neurocritical care unit. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol2010;22: 357–59.
