Multi-strand repairs are often used in flexor tendon surgery. We evaluated the strength of four four-strand tendon repairs with different locks and suture geometry. Forty-eight pig flexor tendons were repaired with the following methods: a cross-lock four-strand repair; a U-shaped repair with circle-locks; a modified Kessler repair with Pennington locks (with longitudinal sutures located more centrally; and another modified Kessler (with longitudinal sutures located more laterally). The tendons were loaded to complete failure of the repairs. The two Kessler repairs showed a 35% lower 2 mm gap force, and 15% lower ultimate strength compared with the other two repairs; the differences were of statistical significance. The failure pattern was breakage of sutures in almost all tendons. These four-strand repairs differed in gapping and ultimate strengths. The Kessler-type repairs with different geometry in the longitudinal sutures produced identical strengths. The Kessler-type repairs with Pennington locks were weaker than the two repairs with either cross-locks or circle-locks.
AngelesJGHemingerHMassDP. Comparative biomechanical performances of 4-strand core suture repairs for zone II flexor tendon lacerations. J Hand Surg Am. 2002, 27: 508–17.
2.
BrockardtCJSullivanLGWatkinsBEWongworawatMD. Evaluation of simple and looped suture and new material for flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 329–32.
3.
CaoYChenCHWuYFXuXFXieRGTangJB. Digital oedema, adhesion formation and resistance to digital motion after primary flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 745–52.
4.
CaoYTangJB. Biomechanical evaluation of a four-strand modification of the Tang method of tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 2005, 30: 374–8.
5.
CaoYTangJB. Strength of tendon repair decreases in the presence of an intact A2 pulley: biomechanical study in a chicken model. J Hand Surg Am. 2009, 34: 1763–70.
6.
CaoYZhuBXieRGTangJB. Influence of core suture purchase length on strength of four-strand tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2006, 31: 107–12.
7.
CaulfieldRHMaleki-TabriziAPatelHColdhamFMeeSNanchahalJ. Comparison of zones 1 to 4 flexor tendon repairs using absorbable and unabsorbable four-strand core sutures. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 412–17.
8.
ElliotDMoiemenNSFlemmingAFHarrisSBFosterAJ. The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen. J Hand Surg Br. 1994, 19: 607–12.
9.
HarrisSBHarrisDFosterAJElliotD. The aetiology of acute rupture of flexor tendon repairs in zones 1 and 2 of the fingers during early mobilization. J Hand Surg Br. 1999, 24: 275–80.
10.
HirparaKMSullivanPJO’SullivanME. The effects of freezing on the tensile properties of repaired porcine flexor tendon. J Hand Surg Am. 2008, 33: 353–8.
11.
HoffmannGLBüchlerUVögelinE. Clinical results of flexor tendon repair in zone II using a six-strand double-loop technique compared with a two-strand technique. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 418–23.
12.
HotokezakaSManskePR. Differences between locking loops and grasping loops: effects on 2-strand core suture. J Hand Surg Am. 1997, 22: 995–1003.
13.
LawrenceTMWoodruffMJAladinADavisTR. An assessment of the tensile properties and technical difficulties of two- and four-strand flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Br. 2005, 30: 294–7.
14.
McLarneyEHoffmanHWolfeSW. Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1999, 24: 295–301.
15.
ManchioJVShashikantMPShrivastavaAWeinzweigJVernadakisAJ. Evaluation of a new 4-strand flexor tendon repair in a cadaveric porcine model. J Hand Surg Am. 2009, 34: 102–7.
16.
MishraVKuiperJHKellyCP. Influence of core suture material and peripheral repair technique on the strength of Kessler flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 2003, 28: 357–62.
17.
NavaliAMRouhaniA. Zone 2 flexor tendon repair in young children: a comparative study of four-strand versus two-strand repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 424–9.
SandowMJMcMahonMM. The six-strand techniques for flexor tendon repair. Atlas Hand Clin. 1996, 1: 65–76.
20.
SavageRRisitanoG. Flexor tendon repair using a ‘six-strand’ method of repair and early active mobilisation. J Hand Surg Br. 1989, 14: 396–9.
21.
SchuindFGarcia-EliasMCooneyWPAnKN. Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. J Hand Surg Am. 1992, 17: 291–8.
22.
SmithAMForderJAAnnapureddySRReddyKSAmisAA. The porcine forelimb as a model for human flexor tendon surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 2005, 30: 307–9.
23.
TanakaTAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMEYangCAnKN. Gliding characteristics and gap formation for locking and grasping tendon repairs: a biomechanical study in a human cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am. 2004, 29: 6–14.
24.
TangJB. Clinical outcomes associated with flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2005, 21: 199–210.
25.
TangJB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007, 32: 118–29.
26.
TangJBShiDGuYQChenJCZhouB. Double and multiple looped suture tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 1994, 19: 699–703.
27.
TangJBTanJXuY. Lengthening and locking: two ways to improve repair strength of obliquely lacerated tendons. J Hand Surg Am. 2003, 28: 832–7.
28.
ViglerMPaltiRGoldsteinRPatelVPNasserPLeeSK. Biomechanical study of cross-locked cruciate versus Strickland flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2008, 33: 1826–33.
29.
ViinikainenAGöranssonHHuovinenKKellomäkiMRokkanenP. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures. J Hand Surg Br. 2004, 29: 536–43.
30.
WadaAKubotaHMiyanishiKHatanakaHMiuraHIwamotoY. Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 2001, 26: 301–6.
31.
WangBXieRGTangJB. Biomechanical analysis of a modification of Tang method of tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 2003, 28: 347–50.
32.
XieRGXueHGGuJHTanJTangJB. Effects of locking area on strength of 2- and 4-strand locking tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 455–60.
33.
ZhaoCAmadioPCPaillardP. Digital resistance and tendon strength during the first week after flexor digitorum profundus tendon repair in a canine model in vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86: 320–7.
34.
ZhaoCMoranSLChaSSAnKNAmadioPC. An analysis of factors associated with failure of tendon repair in the canine model. J Hand Surg Am. 2007, 32: 518–25.
