A prospective longitudinal study was carried out on a cohort of 86 patients who had undergone surgery for diverse wrist conditions. Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, a pain assessment, a wrist functional score, range of movement and grip strength measures were completed. The Mayo Clinic wrist score was also calculated. The World Health Organization International Classification of Function was used as a framework for analysis. The responsiveness of each outcome measure was calculated in terms of distribution- and anchor-based methods. Pain was the most important factor in determining outcome. Changes in objective measures were less important. The responsiveness of the various measures was similar except for the Mayo Clinic wrist score, which was less responsive than the others. Patient-completed measures currently in use are multidimensional. Classifying the content according to the International Classification of Function would clarify the effects of wrist surgery on the different aspects of health.
Altman DGPractical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991:340-340.
2.
Angst F,John M,Pap G, et al.Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total elbow arthroplasty.Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53:73-82
Barbier O,Penta M,Thonnard J-L.Outcome evaluation of the hand and wrist according to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health.Hand Clinics. 2003;19:371-8
5.
Bland JM,Altman DG.Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha.BMJ. 1997;314:507-507
6.
Cohen JStatistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2ndNew York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988:22-4.
7.
Cooney WP,Bussey R,Dobyns JH,Linscheid RL.Difficult wrist fractures. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:136-47
8.
de Vet HC,Ostelo RW,Terwee CB, et al.Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor based and a distribution based approach.Qual Life Res. 2007;16:131-42
9.
de Vet HC,Terwee CB,Ostelo RW,Beckerman H,Knol DL,Bouter LM.Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:54-9
10.
Dixon D,Johnston M,McQueen M,Court-Brown C.The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire can measure the impairment, activity limitations and participation restriction constructs from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).BMC Musculoskelet Dis. 2008;9:114-20
11.
Drummond AS,Sampaio RS,Mancini MC,Kirkwood RN,Stamm TA.Linking the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.J Hand Ther. 2007;20:336-44
12.
Doornberg JN,Ring D,Fabian LM,Malhotra L,Zurakowski D,Jupiter JB.Pain dominates measurements of elbow function and health status.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1725-31
13.
Freedman KB,Slack S,Bernstein J.Sample size and statistical power of randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedics.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:397-402
14.
Gajendran VK,Peterson B,Slater RR,Szabo RM.Long-term outcomes of dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis for chronic scapholunate dissociation.J Hand Surg Br. 2007;32:1323-33
15.
Gupta RK,Singh H,Sandhu VPS.Stabilisation of the distal radioulnar joint with a double-breasted slip of the extensor retinaculum.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:200-2
16.
Harris JE,MacDermid JC,Roth J.The international classification of functioning as an explanatory model of health after distal radius fracture: A cohort study.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:73-81
17.
Hudak PL,Amadio PC,Bombardier C.Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG).Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602-8
18.
ICF. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 2001. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/site/intros/ICF-Eng-Intro.pdf 03/06/2008.
19.
Izquierdo-Avino R,Jones RS,Jansen B,Schwemm E.Hand grip strength analysis: A comparison of two methods.J Orthop Rheumatol. 1995;8:203-6
20.
Karnezis IA,Fragkiadakis EG.Association between objective clinical variables and patient-rated disability of the wrist.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:967-70
21.
MacDermid J.Measurement of health outcomes following tendon and nerve repair.J Hand Ther. 2005;18:297-312
22.
MacDermid JC,Turgeon T,Richards RS,Beadle M,Roth JH.Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool.J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:577-86
Rejas J,Pardo A,Ruiz MA.Standard error of measurement as a valid alternative to minimally important difference for evaluating the magnitude of changes in patient-reported outcomes measures.J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:350-6
26.
Shauver MJ,Chung KC.The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:509-14
27.
Souer JS,Lozano-Calderon SA,Ring D.Predictors of wrist function and health status after operative treatment of fractures of the distal radius.J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:157-63
28.
Stratford PW,Binkley J,Solomon P,Finch E,Gill C,Moreland J.Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland–Morris questionnaire.Phys Ther. 1996;76:359-65
29.
Trail IAArthroplasty of the hand and wrist. Clekheaton: West Yorkshire, Amadeus Press; 2008:11-12.
30.
WHO. World Health Organization. 2001. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf 16/09/2009.
31.
Wyrwich KW,Tierney WM,Wolinsky FD.Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.Qual Life Res. 2002;11:1-7
