A structured review of published papers was done to assess the efficacy and safety of fasciectomy and fasciotomy in European patients with Dupuytren’s contracture. The outcomes varied across 48 studies. For fasciectomy, outcomes and results were as follows: the proportions of patients with a 100% correction in contracture angle ranged from 61 to 97%, the mean improvement in contracture angle ranged from 58 to 79%, and cases judged excellent/good ranged from 63 to 90%. Fasciotomy had similar outcomes, with a mean improvement in contracture angle ranging from 46 to 88%. Immediate failures upon recovery were reported for both procedures. The average recurrence rates were 39% after a fasciectomy and 62% after a fasciotomy at a median time of about 4 years. Overall, about 20% of fasciectomy and fasciotomy patients experienced an adverse event. In summary, postoperative outcomes were successful, but surgical complications were common and recurrence of a contracture was likely within a few years.
AdamRFLoynesRD. Prognosis in Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Am. 1992, 17: 312–7.
2.
AldersonPGreenSHigginsJPT (eds) Cochrane Collaboration Handbook 4.2.1 [updated December 2003]. The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2004.
3.
ArmstrongJRHurrenJSLoganAM. Dermofasciectomy in the management of Dupuytren’s disease. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000, 82: 90–4.
4.
BadoisFJLermusiauxJLMasséCKuntzD. Nonsurgical treatment of Dupuytren’s disease using needle fasciotomy. Rev Rhum Ed Eng. 1993, 60: 692–7.
5.
BoyesJH. Flexor-tendon grafts in the fingers and thumb; an evaluation of end results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950, 32: 489–99 passim.
6.
BulstrodeNWJemecBSmithPJ. The complications of Dupuytren’s contracture surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 1021–5.
7.
CitronNDNunezV. Recurrence after surgery for Dupuytren’s disease: a randomised trial of two skin incisions. J Hand Surg Br. 2005, 30: 563–6.
8.
ClibbonJJLoganAM. Palmar segmental aponeurectomy for Dupuytren’s disease with metacarpophalangeal flexion contracture. J Hand Surg Br. 2001, 26: 360–1.
9.
CoertJHNerinJPMeekMF. Results of partial fasciectomy for Dupuytren disease in 261 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2006, 57: 13–7.
10.
ConstantinouEDeutingerM. [Results after surgical treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture]. Acta Chirurgica Austriaca. 1996, 28: 163–5.
11.
CookDJMulrowCDHaynesRB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997, 126: 376–80.
12.
DiasJJBraybrookeJ. Dupuytren’s contracture: an audit of the outcomes of surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 2006, 31: 514–21.
13.
DuthieRAChesneyRB. Percutaneous fasciotomy for Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Surg Br. 1997, 22: 521–2.
14.
EbskovLBBoeckstynsMESorensenAIHaugegaardM. Day care surgery for advanced Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Surg Br. 1997, 22: 191–2.
15.
EbskovLBBoeckstynsMESorensenAISoe-NielsenN. Results after surgery for severe Dupuytren’s contracture: does a dynamic extension splint influence outcome?Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2000, 34: 155–60.
16.
FoucherGCornilCLenobleE. Open palm technique for Dupuytren’s disease. A five-year follow-up. Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1992, 11: 362–6.
17.
FoucherGCornilCLenobleECitronN. A modified open palm technique for Dupuytren’s disease. Short and long term results in 54 patients. Int Orthop. 1995, 19: 285–8.
18.
FoucherGLallemandSPajardiG. What’s new in the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture?Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1998, 43: 593–9.
19.
FoucherGMedinaJNavarroR. Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy: complications and results. J Hand Surg Br. 2003, 28: 427–31.
20.
FoucherGSchuindFLemarechalP. The open-palm technique in the management of Dupuytren’s contracture. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1985, 30: 211–5.
21.
HallPNFitzgeraldASterneGDLoganAM. Skin replacement in Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Br. 1997, 22: 193–7.
22.
HoetFBoxhoJDecosterE. [Dupuytren’s disease. Review of 326 surgically treated patients]. Ann Chir Main. 1988, 7: 251–5.
23.
HogemannAWolfhardUKendoffDBoardTNOlivierLC. Results of total aponeurectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture in 61 patients: a retrospective clinical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009, 129: 195–201.
24.
HonnerRLambDWJamesJI. Dupuytren’s contracture. Long term results after fasciectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1971, 53: 240–6.
25.
IselinMDieckmannGD. [Therapy of Dupuytren’s contracture with total zigzag plastic surgery]. Presse Med. 1951, 59: 1394–5.
26.
KjeldalINygaardHP. Out-patient surgery for Dupuytren’s disease under intravenous regional anaesthesia. J Hand Surg Br. 1988, 13: 257–8.
27.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 151: W65–94.
28.
LoosBPuschkinVHorchRE. 50 years experience with Dupuytren’s contracture in the Erlangen University Hospital – a retrospective analysis of 2919 operated hands from 1956 to 2006. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007, 8: 60–60.
29.
MacnicolMF. The open palm technique for Dupuytren’s contracture. Int Orthop. 1984, 8: 55–9.
30.
MakelaEAJaromaHHarjuAAnttilaSVainioJ. Dupuytren’s contracture: the long-term results after day surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 1991, 16: 272–4.
31.
MarcuzziACaroliACastagniniLAdaniA. Severe Dupuytren’s contracture. Rivista Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica. 1995, 27: 489–96.
NieminenSLehtoM. Resection of the palmaris longus tendon in surgery for Dupuytren’s contracture. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1986, 75: 164–7.
37.
NorotteGApoilATraversV. A ten years follow-up of the results of surgery for Dupuytren’s disease. A study of fifty-eight cases. Ann Chir Main. 1988, 7: 277–81.
38.
OlmedaATrivellinAM. The treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture by radical aponeurectomy. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1986, 12: 305–14.
39.
RazemonJP. Lateral digital rotation flaps in the treatment of forms of Dupuytren’s contracture. 141 cases. Ann Chir Main. 1982, 1: 199–209.
40.
RoyNSharmaDMirzaAHFahmyN. Fasciectomy and conservative full thickness skin grafting in Dupuytren’s contracture. The fish technique. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006, 72: 678–82.
41.
SmithPBreedC. Central slip attenuation in Dupuytren’s contracture: a cause of persistent flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1994, 19: 840–3.
42.
TonkinMABurkeFDVarianJP. Dupuytren’s contracture: a comparative study of fasciectomy and dermofasciectomy in one hundred patients. J Hand Surg Br. 1984, 9: 156–62.
43.
TripoliMMerleM. The ‘Jacobsen Flap’ for the treatment of stages III–IV Dupuytren’s disease: a review of 98 cases. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 779–82.
44.
TubianaRMichonJ. Classification de la maladie de Dupuytren. Mem Acad Chir (Paris). 1961, 87: 886–7.
45.
TubianaRThomineJMBrownS. Complications in surgery of Dupuytren’s contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967, 39: 603–12.
46.
UllahASDiasJJBhowalB. Does a ‘firebreak’ full-thickness skin graft prevent recurrence after surgery for Dupuytren’s contracture?: a prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009, 91: 374–8.
47.
van RijssenALGerbrandyFSTer LindenHKlipHWerkerPM. A comparison of the direct outcomes of percutaneous needle fasciotomy and limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s disease: a 6-week follow-up study. J Hand Surg Am. 2006, 31: 717–25.
48.
van RijssenALWerkerPM. Percutaneous needle fasciotomy in Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg Br. 2006, 31: 498–501.
49.
VigrouxJPValentinP. A natural history of Dupuytren’s contracture treated by surgical fasciectomy: the influence of diathesis (76 hands reviewed at more than 10 years). Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1992, 11: 367–74.
50.
WilbrandSFlodmarkCEkbomAGerdinB. Activation markers of connective tissue in Dupuytren’s contracture: relation to postoperative outcome. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003, 37: 283–92.
