Commentary on Asshein and Finsen. The DASH and the QuickDASH instruments. Normative values in the general population in Norway;and Iwatsuki et al. Comparative responsiveness of the Hand 20 and the DASH-JSSH to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online February, 2014
Commentary on Asshein and Finsen. The DASH and the QuickDASH instruments. Normative values in the general population in Norway;and Iwatsuki et al. Comparative responsiveness of the Hand 20 and the DASH-JSSH to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release
AmadioPSilversteinMDIlstrupDMSchleckCDJensenLM. Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: the relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease specific and physical examination measures. J Hand Surg Am. 1996, 21: 338–46.
2.
BeatonDWrightJKatzJ. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005, 87: 1038–46.
3.
BlackN. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013; 346: f167.
4.
ChungKCPillsburyMSWaltersMRHaywardRA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998, 23: 575–87.
5.
GayREAmadioPCJohnsonJC. Comparative responsiveness of the DASH, the carpal tunnel questionnaire and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 2003, 28: 250–4.
6.
GreensladeJRMehtaRLBelwardPWarwickDJ. DASH and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?J Hand Surg Br. 2004, 29: 159–64.
7.
HobbyJLVenkateshRMotkurP. The impact of age and gender upon symptoms, self –reported disability and surgical outcomes in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2005a, 30: 599–604.
8.
HobbyJLWattsCElliotD. The validitiy and responsiveness of the patient evaluation measure as an outcome measure in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2005b, 30: 350–4.
9.
HudakPLAmadioPCBombadierC. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH. Am J Ind Med. 1996, 29: 602–8.
KotsisSVChungKC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 81–6.
12.
LevineDSimmonsBKorisM. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993, 75: 1585–92.
13.
MacDermidJC, Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther. 2004, 17: 18–23.
14.
MaceyACBurkeFC. Outcomes in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 1995, 20: 841–55.
15.
NHS Information Centre. National Patient Reported Outcomes Programme. www.ic.nhs.uk/proms. (accessed May 2013).
16.
RolfsonOKarrholmJDahlbergLEGarellickG. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011, 93: 867–75.
