Hand surgeons continue to search for the best surgical flexor tendon repair and treatment of the tendon sheaths and pulleys, and they are attempting to establish postoperative regimens that fit diverse clinical needs. It is the purpose of this report to present the current views, methods, and suggestions of six senior hand surgeons from six different countries — all experienced in tendon repair and reconstruction. Although certainly there is common ground, the report presents provocative views and approaches. The report reflects an update in the views of the committee. We hope that it is helpful to surgeons and therapists in treating flexor tendon injuries.
BariASWoonCYPridgenBChangJ. Overcoming the learning curve: a curriculum-based model for teaching zone II flexor tendon repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012, 130: 381–8.
3.
ClancySPMassDP. Current flexor and extensor tendon motion regimens: a summary. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 295–309.
4.
DyCJDaluiskiA. Flexor pulley reconstruction. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 235–42.
5.
ElliotD. Primary flexor tendon repair—operative repair, pulley management and rehabilitation. J Hand Surg Br. 2002, 27: 507–13.
ElliotD. Clinical primary flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation. The Chelmsford experience. In: TangJBAmadioPCGuimberteauJCChangJ (Eds.) Tendon surgery of the hand. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders, 2012: 125–32.
8.
ElliotDGiesenT. Primary flexor tendon surgery: the search for a perfect result. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 191–206.
9.
HoffmannGLBüchlerUVoeglinE. Clinical results of flexor tendon repair in zone II using a six-strand double-loop technique compared with a two-strand technique. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 418–23.
LalondeDHMartinAL. Wide-awake flexor tendon repair and early tendon mobilization in zones 1 and 2. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 207–13.
12.
LeSVChiuSMeinekeRCWilliamsPWongworawatMD. Number of suture throws and its impact on the biomechanical properties of the four-strand cruciate locked flexor tendon repair with FiberWire. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012, 37: 826–31.
13.
Le VietD. Flexor tendon lengthening by tenotomy at the musculotendinous junction. Ann Plast Surg. 1986,17:239–46.
14.
MomeniAGrauelEChangJ. Complications after flexor tendon injuries. Hand Clin. 2010, 26: 179–89.
15.
MoriyaTLarsonMCZhaoCAnKNAmadioPC. The effect of core suture flexor tendon repair techniques on gliding resistance during static cycle motion and load to failure: a human cadaver study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012, 37: 316–22.
16.
O’SheaKWolfeSW. Two-stage reconstruction with the modified Paneva-Holevich technique. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 223–33.
17.
ParkMJShinSS. Use of suture anchors and new suture materials in the upper extremity. Hand Clin. 2012, 28: 511–8.
18.
SandowMJMcMahonM. Active mobilisation following single cross grasp four-strand flexor tenorrhaphy (Adelaide repair). J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 36: 467–75.
19.
SavageR. The influence of wrist position on the minimum force required for active movement of the interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg Br. 1988, 13: 262–8.
20.
SoodMKElliotD. A new technique of attachment of flexor tendons to the distal phalanx without a button tie-over. J Hand Surg Br. 1996, 21: 629–32.
21.
TangJB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007, 32: 118–29.
22.
WuYFTangJB. Tendon healing, edema, and resistance to flexor tendon gliding: clinical implications. Hand Clin. 2013, 29: 167–78.
23.
VögelinEHoffmannGvon der ZypenV. Clinical primary flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation. The Bern experience. In: TangJBAmadioPCGuimberteauJCChangJ (Eds.) Tendon surgery of the hand. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders, 2012: 116–24.
