This review article examines the mechanical factors involved in tendon repair by sutures. The repair strength, repair stiffness and gap resistance can be increased by increasing the number of core strands and anchor points, by increased anchor point efficiency and the use of peripheral sutures, and by using thicker sutures. In the future, laboratory tests could be standardized to a specific animal model and to a defined cyclic motion programme. Clinical studies support the use of multi-strand core and peripheral sutures, but two-strand core sutures are not adequate to ensure consistently good clinical results. Training surgeons in complex tendon repair techniques is essential.
Al-QattanMM. Isolated flexor digitorum profundus tendon injuries in zone 2A and 2B repaired with figure of eight sutures. J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 36: 147–53.
2.
Al-QattanMMAl-TuraikiTM. Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 using a six-strand ‘figure of eight’ suture. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 322–8.
3.
BarrieKATomacSLCholewickiJMerrellGAWolfeSW. Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2001, 26: 340–6.
4.
BunnellS. Surgery of the hand. Philadelphia, J B. Lippincott Company, 1944.
5.
BunnellS. Repair of tendons in the fingers. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1922, 35: 88–97.
6.
ChongAKSLimBHPengYP. The Singapore experience. In: TangJBAmadioPCGuimberteauJCChangJ (Eds) Tendon surgery of the hand. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012: 153–6.
7.
CroogAGoldsteinRNasserPLeeSK. Comparative biomechanic performances of locked cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repairs in an ex vivo porcine model. J Hand Surg Am. 2007, 32: 225–32.
8.
DinopoulosHTBoyerMIBurnsMEGelbermanRHSilvaMJ. The resistance of a four and eight strand suture technique to gap formation during tensile testing: an experimental study of repaired canine flexor tendons after 10 days of in vivo healing. J Hand Surg Am. 2000, 25: 489–98.
9.
DonaETurnerAWLGianoutsosMPWalshWR. Biomechanical properties of four circumferential flexor tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 2003, 28: 824–31.
10.
EjeskarA. Finger flexion force and hand grip strength after tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1982, 7: 61–5.
11.
GeisenTSirotakovaMCopseyAJElliotD. Flexor pollicis longus primary repair: further experience with the Tang technique and controlled active mobilisation. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 30: 758–61.
12.
GibbonsCEThompsonDSandowMJ. Flexor tenorrhaphy tensile strength: reduction by cyclic loading: in vitro and ex vivo porcine study. Hand (NY). 2009, 4: 113–8.
13.
GillRSLimBHShatfordRATothEVoorMJTsaiTM. A comparative analysis of the six strand double-loop flexor tendon repair and three other techniques: a human cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 1999, 24: 1315–22.
14.
HarrisSBHarrisDFosterAJElliotD. The aetiology of acute rupture of flexor tendon repairs in zone 1 and 2 of the fingers during early mobilisation. J Hand Surg Br. 1999, 24: 275–80.
15.
HausmannJNVekszlerGBijakMBeneschTVecseiVGablerC. Biomechanical comparison of modified Kessler and running suture repair three different animal tendons and in human flexor tendons. J Hand Surg Am. 2009, 34: 93–101.
16.
HirparaKMSullivanPJRaheemOO’SullivanME. A biomechanical analysis of multistrand repairs with the Silfverskiöld peripheral cross-stitch. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007, 29: 1396–401.
17.
HotokezakaSManskePR. Differences between locking loops and grasping loops: effects on two-strand core sutures. J Hand Surg Am. 1997, 22: 995–1003.
18.
KarjalainenTHeMChongAKSLimAYTRyhanenJ. An analysis of the pull-out strength of six suture loop configurations in flexor tendons. J Hand Surg Am. 2012, 37: 217–23.
19.
KleinertH EKutzJ EAtasoyEStormoA. Primary repair of flexor tendons. Orthop Clin North Am. 1973, 4: 865–76.
LaheyFH. A tendon suture which permits immediate motion. Boston Med Surg J. 1923, 188, 22: 851–2.
22.
MaoWFWuYFZhouYLTangJB. A study of the anatomy and repair strengths of porcelain flexor and extensor tendons: are they appropriate experimental models?J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 36: 663–9.
23.
MashadiZBAmisAA. The effect of locking loops on the strength of tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 1991, 16: 35–9.
24.
MathesonGNicklinSGianoutsousMPWalshWR. Comparison of zone II flexor tendon repairs using an in vitro linear cyclic testing protocol. Clin Biomech. 2005, 20: 718–22.
PeckFHBucherCAWatsonJSRoeA. A comparative study of two methods of controlled mobilisation of flexor tendon repairs in zone two. J Hand Surg Br. 1998, 23: 41–5.
27.
PeltzTSHaddadRScougallP JGianoutsosMPBertolloNWalshWR. Performance of a knotless four-strand flexor tendon repair with a unidirectional barbed suture device: a dynamic ex-vivo comparison. J Hand Surg Eur. 2013, 39: 30–39.
28.
PeltzTSHaddadRScougallP JNicklinSGianoutsosMPWalshWR. Influence of locking stitch size in a four-strand cross locked cruciate flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2011, 36: 450–5.
29.
RiderMA. The Wellington experience. In: TangJBAmadioPCGuimberteauJCChangJ (Eds) Tendon surgery of the hand. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012: 168–70.
30.
SandersDWMilneADJohnsonJADunningCERichardsRSKingGJW. The effect of flexor tendon repair bulk on tendon gliding during simulated active motion: an in vitro comparison of two strand and six strand techniques. J Hand Surg Am. 2001, 25: 833–40.
31.
SandowMJ. Flexor tendon repair techniques: Adelaide repair. In: DiaoEMassDP (Eds) Master Skills: Tendon injury in the hand and upper extremity. Chicago, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, 2011: 111–8.
32.
SandowMJMcMahonMM. Active mobilisation following single cross grasp four-strand flexor tenorrhaphy (Adelaide repair). J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 36: 467–75.
33.
SandowMJMcMahonMM. Single-cross grasp six-strand repair for acute flexor tenorrhaphy: modified Savage technique. Atlas Hand Clin. 1996, 1: 65–76.
34.
SavageR. In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 1985, 10: 135–41.
35.
SavageRRisitanoG. Flexor tendon repair using a ‘six-strand’ method of repair and early active mobilisation. J Hand Surg Br. 1989, 14: 396–9.
36.
SilfverskiöldKLAnderssonCH. Two new methods of tendon repair: an in vitro evaluation of tensile strength and gap formation. J Hand Surg Am. 1993, 18: 58–65.
37.
SirotakovaMElliotD. Early active mobilisation of primary repairs of the flexor pollicis longus tendon.J Hand Surg Br. 1999, 24B: 647–53.
38.
SirotakovaMElliotD. Early active mobilisation of primary repairs of the flexor pollicis longus tendon with two Kessler two-strand core sutures and a strengthened circumferential suture. J Hand Surg Br. 2004, 29: 531–5.
39.
SmallJOBrennenMDColvilleJ. Early active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg Br. 1989, 14: 383–91.
40.
SmithAMEvansDM. Biomechanical assessment of a new type of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 2001, 26: 217–9.
41.
TangJBShiDGuYQChenJCZhouB. Double and multiple looped suture tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 1994, 19: 699–703.
42.
ThurmanTRTrumbleTEHanelDPTencerAFKiserPK. Two, four and six strand zone II flexor tendon repairs: an in situ biomechanical comparison using a cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am. 1998, 23: 261–5.
43.
TsugeKYoshikazuIMatsuishiY. Intratendinous tendon suture in the hand – a new technique. Hand. 1975, 7: 250–5.
44.
TsugeKMatsuishiY. Repair of flexor tendons by intratendinous tendon suture. J Hand Surg Am. 1977, 2: 436–40.
45.
VerdanCE. Primary repair of flexor tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960, 42: 647–57.
46.
VögelinETraber-HoffmanGVan de ZypenV. The Bern experience. In: TangJBAmadioPCGuimberteauJCChangJ (Eds) Tendon surgery of the hand. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2012: 116–124.
47.
ViinikainenAGoranssonHHuovinenKKellomakiMRokkanenP. A comparative analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of five flexor tendon core sutures. J Hand Surg Br. 2004, 29: 536–43.
48.
WadePJFWetherellRGAmisAA. Flexor tendon repair: significant gain in strength from the Halstead peripheral suture technique. J Hand Surg Br. 1989, 14: 232–5.
49.
WuYFTangJB. How much does a Pennington lock add to strength of a tendon repair?J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 36: 476–84.
50.
WuYFTangJBWuYF. Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 6–19.
51.
XieRGTangJB. Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 461–5.
52.
XieRGXueHGGuJHTanJTangJB. Effects of locking area on strength of 2 and 4 strand locking tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 455–60.
