The use of the digital flexor sheath to reconstruct damaged structures in the fingers is an intriguing but under-investigated subject. The sheath is anchored firmly to the phalanges and palmar plates and has well-vascularized outer and synovial inner layers. The middle layer is strong and fibrous and not all of it is required for its main biomechanical function of maintaining the moment arm of the flexor tendons. These characteristics have led to several descriptions of different reconstructive uses. In sheath reconstruction, flaps can be used to repair damaged A2 and A4 pulleys. As an anchor, the sheath is useful for tenodeses and tendon transfers. It has been used in the correction of ulnar claw and swan neck deformities. In ligament reconstruction, the A1 pulley has been used to reconstruct the transverse intermetacarpal ligament in cleft hand and ray amputations. The sheath has also been used to cover tendon repairs and periosteal defects with the aim of decreasing adhesions. There is potential for further use of the flexor sheath in reconstructive surgery.
The digital flexor sheath can be used to restore various finger functions providing its physiological roles are recognized and preserved. This review considers the different techniques described and their potential uses.
BayatAShaabanHGiakasGLeesVC. The pulley system of the thumb: anatomic and biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2002, 27: 628–35.
2.
BrandsmaJWBrandPW. Claw-finger correction. Considerations in choice of technique. J Hand Surg Br. 1992, 17: 615–21.
3.
CatalanoLWSkarparisACGlickelSZ. Treatment of chronic, traumatic hyperextension deformities of the proximal interphalangeal joint with flexor digitorum superficialis tenodesis. J Hand Surg Am. 2003, 28:448–52.
4.
ChevallardAJ. Simplified surgical technique for flexible clawed hand rehabilitation. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1987, 55: 160–2.
de JagerLTJaffeRLearmonthIDHeywoodAW. The A1 pulley in rheumatoid flexor tenosynovectomy. To retain or divide?J Hand Surg Br. 1994, 19: 202–4.
7.
DonaEWalshWR. Flexor tendon pulley V-Y plasty: an alternative to pulley venting or resection. J Hand Surg Br. 2006, 31: 133–7.
8.
DoyleJRBlytheW. The flexor tendon sheath and pulleys: anatomy and reconstruction. In: AAOS symposium on tendon surgery in the hand, St Louis, Mosby, 1975: 81–7.
9.
ElliotD. Primary flexor tendon repair – operative repair, pulley management and rehabilitation. J Hand Surg Br. 2002, 27: 507–13.
10.
FarkasLG. Use of interposed flap of tendon sheath to prevent adhesions after the repair of a cut flexor profundus tendon: experimental study in chickens. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978, 62: 404–6.
11.
HagbergLHeinegardDOhlssonK. The contents of macromolecule solutes in flexor tendon sheath fluid and their relation to synovial fluid. A quantitative analysis. J Hand Surg Br. 1992, 17: 167–71.
12.
HovingEWHillenB. Functional anatomy of the vagina fibrosa of the flexors of the fingers. J Hand Surg Br. 1989, 14: 99–101.
13.
IdlerRS. Anatomy and biomechanics of the digital flexor tendons. Hand Clin. 1985, 1: 3–11.
14.
KapandjiIA. [Reconstructive augmentation of the metacarpal tendons]. Ann Chir Main. 1983, 2: 281–2.
15.
KarabagliYErçelCKöseAAOnerUAçikalinMFCetinC. Preventive effects of a turnover flexor tendon sheath flap on adhesion formation after flexor profundus tendon injury: an experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008, 61: 150–7.
16.
KatzmanBMKleinDMGarvenTCCaligiuriDAKungJ. Comparative histology of the annular and cruciform pulleys. J Hand Surg Br. 1999, 24: 272–4.
17.
KleinertHEForshewFCCohenMJ. Repair of zone 1 flexor tendon injuries. In: AAOS symposium on tendon surgery in the hand, St Louis, Mosby, 1975: 115–22.
LinGTAmadioPCAnKNCooneyWP. Functional anatomy of the human digital flexor pulley system. J Hand Surg Am. 1989a, 14: 949–56.
20.
LinGTAmadioPCAnKNCooneyWPChaoEY. Biomechanical analysis of finger flexor pulley reconstruction. J Hand Surg Br. 1989b, 14: 278–82.
21.
LowCKPereiraBPNgRTLowYPWongHP. The effect of the extent of A1 pulley release on the force required to flex the digits. A cadaver study on the thumb, middle and ring fingers. J Hand Surg Br. 1998, 23: 46–9.
22.
LundborgG. Experimental flexor tendon healing without adhesion formation—a new concept of tendon nutrition and intrinsic healing mechanisms. A preliminary report. Hand. 1976, 8: 235–8.
23.
LundborgGMyrhageR. The vascularization and structure of the human digital tendon sheath as related to flexor tendon function. An angiographic and histological study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977, 11: 195–203.
MitsionisGFischerKJBastidasJAGrewalRPfaeffleHJTomainoMM. Feasibility of partial A2 and A4 pulley excision: residual pulley strength. J Hand Surg Br. 2000, 25: 90–4.
26.
NishidaJAmadioPCBettingerPCAnKN. Flexor tendon-tendon sheath interaction after tendon grafting: a biomechanical study in a human model in vitro. J Hand Surg Am. 1999, 24: 1097–102.
27.
OginoT. Cleft hand. Hand Clin. 1990, 6: 661–71.
28.
PaillardPJAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMEAnKN. Pulley plasty versus resection of one slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis after repair of both flexor tendons in zone II: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002, 84: 2039–45.
29.
PetersonWWManskePRBollingerBALeskerPAMcCarthyJA. Effect of pulley excision on flexor tendon biomechanics. J Orthop Res. 1986a, 4: 96–101.
30.
PetersonWWManskePRLeskerPA. The effect of flexor sheath integrity on nutrient uptake by primate flexor tendons.J Hand Surg Am. 1986b, 11: 413–6.
31.
PhillipsCMassD. Mechanical analysis of the palmar aponeurosis pulley in human cadavers. J Hand Surg Am. 1996, 21: 240–4.
32.
RiordanD. Tendon transfers for median, ulnar or radial palsy. Hand. 1969, 1: 42–6.
33.
SaitoSSuzukiY. Biomechanics of the volar plate of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a dynamic ultrasonographic study. J Hand Surg Am. 2011, 36: 265–71.
34.
SavageR. The mechanical effect of partial resection of the digital fibrous flexor sheath. J Hand Surg Br. 1990, 15: 435–42.
35.
SbernardoriMCFenuGPirinoAFabbricianiCMontellaA. Histogenesis and morphology of the flexor tendon pulley system in the human embryonic hand. J Hand Surg Br. 2000, 25: 175–9.
36.
SirotakovaMFigusAJarrettPMishraAElliotD. Correction of swan neck deformity in rheumatoid arthritis using a new lateral extensor band technique. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 712–6.
37.
TangJB. The double sheath system and tendon gliding in zone 2C. J Hand Surg Br. 1995, 20: 281–5.
38.
TangJBSeiichiIMasamichiU. Surgical management of the tendon sheath at different repair stages. Biomechanical and morphological evaluations of direct sheath closure, partial sheath excision, and interposing sheath grafting. Chin Med J (Engl). 1990, 103: 295–303.
39.
ThompsonJSLittlerJWUptonJ. The spiral oblique retinacular ligament (SORL). J Hand Surg Am. 1978, 3: 482–7.
40.
TomainoMMitsionisGBasitidasJGrewalRPfaeffleA. The effect of partial excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys on the biomechanics of finger flexion. J Hand Surg Br. 1998, 23: 50–2.
41.
VareyAHHughesJMDevarajVS. Use of the A3 pulley as an interposition flap to cover periosteal defects. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 542–3.
42.
WatanabeHHashizumeHInoueH. Collagen framework of the volar plate of human proximal interphalangeal joint. Acta Med Okayama. 1994, 48: 101–8.
43.
WolfeSW. Tendinopathy. In: WolfeSWHotchkissRNPedersonWCKozinSH (Eds). Green’s operative hand surgery, 6th edn. New York, Elsevier, 2011, Vol. 2.
44.
ZancolliE. Intrinsic paralysis of the ulnar nerve – physiopathology of the claw hand. In: Structural and dynamic bases of hand surgery, 2nd Edn.Philadelphia, JB Lippincott, 1979: 159–206.
45.
ZissimosAGSzaboRMYingerKESharkeyNA. Biomechanics of the thumb flexor pulley system. J Hand Surg Am. 1994, 19: 475–9.
