The purpose of this study was to determine if nerve conduction studies predict time to resolution of symptoms after carpal tunnel release. A total of 56 patients undergoing open carpal tunnel release were prospectively enrolled. Pre-operative presence of nocturnal symptoms and daytime numbness/tingling were documented. Pre-operative nerve conduction studies were reviewed and classified as mild, moderate, or severe. After open carpal tunnel release, patients were contacted by phone within 48 hours, at 1 week, and then at 2-week intervals for up to 9 months or until both nocturnal and daytime symptoms had resolved. This study found that patients with mild or moderate carpal tunnel syndrome experience a faster time to resolution of daytime numbness and tingling when compared with patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Nocturnal symptoms resolved quickly in both groups. The results of this study are in contrast to previous studies that found little to no value of nerve conduction studies in predicting post-operative functional and subjective outcomes.
al-QattanMMBowenVManktelowRT. Factors associated with poor outcome following primary carpal tunnel release in non-diabetic patients. J Hand Surg Br. 1994, 19: 622–5.
2.
BeckJDWingertNCRutterMRIrgitKSTangXKlenaJC. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in patients 65 and over. J Hand Surg Am. 2013, 38: 1524–9.
3.
BeckerSJEMakanjiHSRingD. Changes in treatment plan for carpal tunnel syndrome based on electrodiagnostic test results. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 187–93.
ConcannonMJGainorBPetroskiGFPuckettCL. The predictive value of electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997, 100: 1452–8.
DeStefanoFNordstromDLVierkantRA. Long-term symptom outcomes of carpal tunnel syndrome and its treatment. J Hand Surg Am. 1997, 22: 200–10.
11.
EdgellSEMcCabeSJBreidenbachWCLaJoieASAbellTD. Predicting the outcome of carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 2003; 28: 255–61.
12.
FinestoneHMWoodburyGMCollaviniTMarchukYMaryniakO. Severe carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical and electrodiagnostic outcome of surgical and conservative management. Muscle Nerve. 1996, 19: 237–9.
13.
GayREAmadioPCJohnsonJC. Comparative responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 2003, 28: 250–4.
14.
GlowackiKABreenCJSacharKWeissAP. Electrodiagnostic testing and carpal tunnel release outcome. J Hand Surg Am. 1996, 21: 117–21.
15.
GongHSOhJHBinSWKimWSChungMSBaekGH. Clinical features influencing the patient-based outcome after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 2008, 33: 1512–7.
16.
HeybeliNKutluhanSDemirciSKermanMMumcuEF. Assessment of outcome of carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison of electrophysiological findings and a self-administered Boston questionnaire. J Hand Surg Br. 2002, 27: 259–64.
17.
JableckiCKAndaryMTFloeterMK. Practice parameter: Electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology. 2002, 58: 1589–92.
18.
KatzJNKellerRBSimmonsBP. Maine Carpal Tunnel Study: outcomes of operative and nonoperative therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome in a community-based cohort. J Hand Surg Am. 1998, 23: 697–710.
19.
KatzJNLosinaEAmickBC3rdFosselAHBessetteLKellerRB. Predictors of outcomes of carpal tunnel release. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 44: 1184–93.
20.
KeithMWMasearVAmadioPC. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009, 17: 397–405.
21.
KimJKJeonSH. Minimal clinically important differences in the Carpal Tunnel Quesionnaire after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012, 38: 75–9.
22.
KulickMIGordilloGJavidiTKilgoreESJrNewmayerWL3rd. Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1986, 11: 59–66.
23.
LeeLHAl-MaiyahMAl-BahraniRZBhargavaAAuyeungAJStothardJ. Outcome of carpal tunnel release – Correlation with wrist and wrist–palm anthropomorphic measurements. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015, 40: 186–92.
24.
LimPGTanSAhmadTS. The role of wrist anthropometric measurement in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 645–7.
25.
LongstaffLMilnerRHO’SullivanSFawcettP. Carpal tunnel syndrome: the correlation between outcome, symptoms, and nerve conduction study findings. J Hand Surg Br. 2001, 26: 475–80.
26.
LouieDEarpBBlazarP. Long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release: a critical review of the literature. Hand (NY). 2012, 7: 242–6.
27.
LouieDLEarpBECollinsJE. Outcomes of open carpal tunnel release at a minimum of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013, 95: 1067–73.
28.
MakanjiiHSZhaoMMudgalCSJupiterJBRingD. Correspondence between clinical presentation and electrophysiologic testing for potential carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012, 38: 489–95.
29.
MondelliMRealeFSicurelliFPaduaL. Relationship between the self-administered Boston questionnaire and electrophysiological findings in follow-up of surgically-treated carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2000, 25: 128–34.
30.
RotmanMBEnkvetchakulBVMegerianJTGozaniSN. Time course and predictors of median nerve conduction after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 2004, 29: 367–72.
31.
SchrijverHMGerritsenAAStrijersRL. Correlating nerve conduction studies and clinical outcome measures on carpal tunnel syndrome: lessons from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Neurophys. 2005, 22: 216–21.
32.
ZylukASzlosserZ. The results of carpal tunnel release for carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed on clinical grounds, with our without electrophysiological investigations: a randomized study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012, 38: 44–9.
