This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors affecting survival rate of digital replantation by a meta-analysis. A computer retrieval of MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE, and CNKI databases was conducted to identify citations for digital replantation with digit or finger or thumb or digital or fingertip and replantation as keywords. RevMan 5.2 software was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios. In total, there were 4678 amputated digits in 2641 patients. Gender and ischemia time had no significant influence on the survival rate of amputation replantation (P > 0.05). Age, injured hand, injury type, zone, and the method of preservation the amputated digit significantly influence the survival rate of digital replantation (P < 0.05). Children, right hand, crush, or avulsion and little finger are the risk factors that adversely affect the outcome.
ChoiMSSLeeJHHwi KiSAhnHC. Trends in digital replantation. Current Orthop Practice. 2012, 23: 284–8.
8.
DecW. A meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation. Techniques Hand Upper Extremity Surg. 2006, 10: 124–9.
9.
HasuoTNishiGTsuchiyaDOtsukaT. Fingertip replantations: importance of venous anastomosis and the clinical results. Hand Surg. 2009, 14: 1–6.
10.
HattoriYIkedaKAbeYDhawanV. Significance of venous anastomosis in fingertip replantation. Plastic Recon Surg. 2003, 111: 1151–8.
11.
HeY. Analysis on influencing factors of survival rate of replantation of severed cut-fingers with logistic regression. School of Public Health, Dali, China: Dali University, 2010, Vol. Master.
12.
HeisteinJBCookPA. Factors affecting composite graft survival in digital tip amputations. Annals Plastic Surg. 2003, 50: 299–303.
13.
ItoHSasakiKMoriokaKNozakiM. Fingertip amputation salvage on arterial anastomosis alone: an investigation of its limitations. Annals Plastic Surg. 2010, 65: 302–5.
14.
JanezicTFArnezZMSolincMZaletel–KrageljL. One hundred sixty–seven thumb replantations and revascularisations: early microvascular results. Microsurg. 1996, 17: 259–63.
15.
KimKSEoSRKimDYLeeSYChoBH. A new strategy of fingertip reattachment: sequential use of microsurgical technique and pocketing of composite graft. Plastic Recon Surg. 2001, 107: 73–9.
KomatsuSTamaiS. Successful replantation of a completely cut-off thumb. Plastic Recon Surg. 1968, 42: 374–7.
18.
LinCHAydynNLinYTHsuCTYehJT. Hand and finger replantation after protracted ischemia (more than 24 hours). Annals Plastic Surg. 2010, 64: 286–90.
19.
LiuXZhangDShuoWZhaoYWangRZhaoJ. Long term outcome after conservative and surgical treatment of haemorrhagic moyamoya disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012, 8: 258–65.
20.
MaricevichMCarlsenBMardiniSMoranS. Upper extremity and digital replantation. Hand. 2011, 6: 356–63.
21.
PartlinMChenJHoldgateA. The preoperative preservation of amputated digits: An assessment of proposed methods. J Trauma. 2008, 65: 127–31.
RenZPLiuYHLiuDLiangYH. The related factors affecting the survival rate of fingertip replantation. Hebei Med J. 2012, 34: 2790–1.
24.
SalahMMKhalidKN. Replantation of multiple digits and hand amputations: four case reports. Cases J. 2008, 1: 266–72.
25.
ShiDQiJLiDZhuLJinWCaiD. Fingertip replantation at or beyond the nail base in children. Microsurg. 2010, 30: 380–5.
26.
SongHTianWCWangY. Clinical observation of the influence of cigarette smoking on digit replantation. Chinese J Orthop. 2001, 9: 008.
27.
TamaiS. Twenty years’ experience of limb replantation—review of 293 upper extremity replants. J Hand Surg Am. 1982, 7: 549–56.
28.
TarkKCKimYWLeeYHLewJD. Replantation and revascularization of hands: clinical analysis and functional results of 261 cases. J Hand Surg Am. 1989, 14: 17–27.
29.
UrbaniakJRRothJHNunleyJAGoldnerRDKomanLA. The results of replantation after amputation of a single finger. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985, 67: 611–9.
30.
VenkatramaniHSabapathySR. Fingertip replantation: Technical considerations and outcome analysis of 24 consecutive fingertip replantations. Indian J Plastic Surg. 2011, 44: 237–45.
31.
VorvickLJMaCBZieveD. Amputation – traumatic. US National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, USA: Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health, 2004.
32.
WaikakulSSakkarnkosolSVanadurongwanVUn-nanuntanaA. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury. 2000, 31: 33–40.
33.
WangLHZhangGQ. Use of digital subtraction angiography for assessment of digital replantation. J Zhejiang University Sci B. 2012, 13: 209–12.
ZhuZB. Mutiple factors analysis on survival rate of digital replantation. Second Xiangya Hospital. Changsha, China: Central South University, 2011, Vol. Master.
