ChangMKWongYRTaySC. Biomechanical comparison of modified Lim/Tsai tendon repairs with intra- and extra-tendinous knots. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 919–24.
2.
ChenJWuYFXingSGPanZJ. Suture knots between tendon stumps may not benefit tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 1005–06.
3.
GiesenTReissnerLBesmensIPolitikouOCalcagniM. Flexor tendon repair in the hand with the M-Tang technique (without peripheral sutures), pulley division, and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 474–79.
4.
HayRASWongYRLokeAMTaySC. Biomechanical investigation of uneven load bearing in six-strand Lim-Tsai flexor tendon repair using Fiber Loop. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 457–61.
5.
LalondeDH. Conceptual origins, current practice, and views of wide awake hand surgery. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 886–95.
6.
MoriyaKYoshizuTTsubokawaNNarisawaHMakiY. Incidence of tenolysis and features of adhesions in the digital flexor tendons after multi-strand repair and early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019, 44: 354–60.
7.
PanZJXuYFPanLChenJ. Zone 2 flexor tendon repairs using a tensioned strong core suture, sparse peripheral stitches and early active motion: results in 60 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019, 44: 361–66.
8.
ReissnerLZechmann-MuellerNKleinHJCalcagniMGiesenT. Sonographic study of repair, gapping and tendon bowstringing after primary flexor digitorum profundus repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018, 43: 480–86.
9.
RigóIZHaugstvedtJRRøkkumM. The effect of adding active flexion to modified Kleinert regime on outcomes for zone 1 to 3 flexor tendon repairs. A prospective randomized trial. J Hand Surg Eur. 2017, 42: 920–29.
10.
TangJB. Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007, 32: 118–29.
11.
TangJB. Recent evolutions in flexor tendon repairs and rehabilitation. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018a, 43: 469–73.
12.
TangJB. New developments are improving flexor tendon repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018b, 141: 1427–37.
