Ultra-high-definition (22 MHz) ultrasound of the ulnar nerve: additional value and normative data

Abstract

We studied 30 healthy volunteers (60 arms), categorized into three age groups with equal numbers to verify if a 22 MHz compared with a 15 MHz ultrasound transducer has additional value for studying the intraneural architecture of the ulnar nerve throughout its course. At six sites, there were no differences in cross-sectional area measurements between the two transducers. With both, the cross-sectional area was significantly larger at the medial epicondyle compared with the other sites and smaller at the mid-forearm and Guyon’s canal compared with the mid-upper arm. With higher age the cross-sectional area significantly increased. Significantly more fascicles were visible distal to the medial epicondyle compared with more proximal sites, as well as in men compared with women. Finally, higher body weight was related to a significantly smaller number of fascicles being seen. A 22 MHz transducer depicts more details of the intraneural architecture than a 15 MHz transducer. Our data can be used as normative data or reference values in analysing ulnar nerve pathology.

Level of evidence: II

Keywords

High-definition ultrasound ulnar nerve intraneural architecture fascicles normative data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Assmus

Antoniadis

Bischoff

, et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome – a review and management guidelines. Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2011, 72: 90–8.

Beekman

Van der Plas

Uitdehaag

Schellens

Visser

LH.

Clinical, electrodiagnostic, and sonographic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve. 2004a, 30: 202–8.

Beekman

Schoemaker

Van Der Plas

, et al. Diagnostic value of high-resolution sonography in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurology. 2004b, 62: 767–73.

Campbell

WW.

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve. 2000, 23: 450–2.

Cartwright

Shin

Passmore

Walker

FO.

Ultrasonographic findings of the normal ulnar nerve in adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007, 88: 394–6.

Chen

Wang

Ren

The feasibility of using high-resolution ultrasonography to assess ulnar nerve in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Ultrason. 2017, 17: 160–6.

Kim

Date

Lee

Yoon

Hur

Kim

SJ.

Distance measure error induced by displacement of the ulnar nerve when the elbow is flexed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005, 86: 809–12.

Ozturk

Sonmez

Colak

, et al. Sonographic appearances of the normal ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008, 36: 325–9.

Tagliafico

Martinoli

Reliability of side-to-side sonographic cross-sectional area measurements of upper extremity nerves in healthy volunteers. J Ultrasound Med. 2013, 32: 457–62.

10.

Yalcin

Onder

Akyuz

Ulnar nerve measurements in healthy individuals to obtain reference values. Rheumatol Int. 2013, 33: 1143–7.

11.

Yalcin

Unlu

Akyuz

Karaahmet

OZ.

Ultrasound diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy: comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic nerve thickness. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 167–71.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.39 MB

0.57 MB