We analysed complications, revision surgeries, and patient-reported and clinical outcomes 2 years after trapeziometacarpal joint implant arthroplasty using the Touch® prosthesis. Of 130 operated patients with trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis, four had to be revised owing to implant dislocation, loosening or impingement, leading to an estimated 2-year survival rate of 96% (95% confidence interval: 90 to 99). Of 101 patients available for the 2-year follow-up, complications occurred in 17, with the most frequent being de Quervain stenosing vaginosis (n = 6) and trigger thumb (n = 5). Pain at rest decreased significantly from a median value of 5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4 to 7) before surgery to 0 (IQR: 0 to 1) at 2 years. Key pinch strength increased significantly from 4.5 kg (IQR: 3.0 to 6.5) to 7.0 kg (IQR: 6.0 to 8.0). We recommend surgery with the Touch® prosthesis as the standard procedure for patients with isolated trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis because of the high survival rate and promising outcomes at 2 years.
BellemèrePLussiezB.Thumb carpometacarpal implant arthroplasty. Hand Clin. 2022,
38: 217–30.
2.
BenchimolEISmeethLGuttmannA, et al.
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015,
12: e1001885.
3.
Cebrian-GomezRLizaur-UtrillaASebastia-ForcadaELopez-PratsFA.Outcomes of cementless joint prosthesis versus tendon interposition for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019,
44: 151–8.
4.
CooneyWPLeddyTPLarsonDR.Revision of thumb trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2006,
31: 219–27.
5.
DremstrupLThillemannJKKirkebyLLarsenLPHansenTBStillingM.Two-year results of the Moovis trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with focus on early complications. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021,
46: 131–40.
6.
DuerinckxJVerstrekenF.Total joint replacement for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: why and how?EFORT Open Rev. 2022,
7: 349–55.
7.
EatonRGGlickelSZ.Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Staging as a rationale for treatment. Hand Clin. 1987,
3: 455–71.
8.
FalknerFTumkayaAMThomasBPanzramBBickertBHarhausL.Dual mobility prosthesis for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: results from a prospective study of 55 prostheses. J Hand Surg Eur. 2023,
48: 566–74.
9.
FroschauerSMHolzbauerMMihalicJAKwasnyO.TOUCH® prosthesis for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: a prospective case series. J Clin Med. 2021,
10: 4090.
10.
Gonzalez-EspinoPPottierMDetrembleurCGoffinD.Touch(R) double mobility arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: outcomes for 92 prostheses. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021,
40: 760–4.
11.
HarrisPATaylorRThielkeRPayneJGonzalezNCondeJG.Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009,
42: 377–81.
12.
HolmeTJKarbowiakMClementsJSharmaRCraikJEllaheeN.Thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2021,
6: 316–30.
13.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14155:192 2020. Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects — Good clinical practice. 2020. https://www.iso.org/standard/71690.html (accessed 10 May 2023)
14.
KaszapBDaeckeWJungM.Outcome comparison of primary trapeziectomy versus secondary trapeziectomy following failed total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. J Hand Surg Am. 2013,
38: 863–71.
15.
KirkebyLFrostPSvendsenSWHansenTB.Revision rates of trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty in relation to occupational hand force requirements. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021,
46: 968–74.
16.
KnoblochKKraemerRPapstSSorgHVogtPM.German version of the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire: implications for early quality of life following collagenase injection in dupuytren contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012,
129: 886e–7e.
17.
LeeJKYoonBHLeeHIKimCChoiSHanSH.Prosthetic eplacement has a clinical outcome superior to that of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition: a meta-analysis. Orthopedics. 2021,
44: e151–e7.
18.
LenoirHErblandALumensDCouletBChammasM.Trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction tendon interposition after failed trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2016,
35: 21–6.
19.
LussiezBFalaiseCLedouxP.Dual mobility trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: a prospective study of 107 cases with a follow-up of more than 3 years. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021,
46: 961–7.
20.
MattilaSWarisE.Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes. Acta Orthop. 2019,
90: 389–93.
21.
MegerleKGroulsSGermannGKloetersOHellmichS.Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011,
131: 205–10.
22.
RajSClayRRamjiS, et al.
Trapeziectomy versus joint replacement for first carpometacarpal (CMC 1) joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022,
32: 1001–21.
23.
RemySDetrembleurCLiboutonXBonnelanceMBarbierO.Trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: an updated systematic review. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2020,
39: 492–501.
24.
TangJBGiddinsG.Why and how to report surgeons' levels of expertise. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016,
41: 365–6.
25.
TchurukdichianAGerentonBMorisVSeeLAStivalaAGuillierD.Outcomes of double-mobility prosthesis in trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis with a minimal 3 years of follow-up: an advantage for implant stability. Hand (N Y). 2021,
16: 368–74.
26.
Van MelkebekeLCaekebekePDuerinckxJ.Early results of double mobility trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty: prospective series of 82 Touch prosthesis. Minerva. 2022,
73: 241–6.
27.
WaljeeJFKimHMBurnsPBChungKC.Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011,
128: 208–20.
28.
WehrliMHenslerSSchindeleSHerrenDBMarksM.Measurement properties of the Brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in patients with Dupuytren contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2016,
41: 896–902.
29.
WolfJMAtroshiIZhouCKarlssonJEnglundM.Sick leave after surgery for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a population-based study. J Hand Surg Am. 2018,
43: 439–47.
