New and Improved,but Still Cold and Symbolic

Abstract

My commentary applauds the authors' cognitive framework for capturing the inferential complexity and flexibility of emotion processing. The framework offers generative powers, as demonstrated by new studies, and an insightful perspective on classic studies. However, at the core, the framework is still symbolic and cold—reflecting its origins in amodal views of the mind. This leads to two troubles. First, the framework cannot incorporate evidence for embodied, modal processing of emotion. Second, the framework overemphasizes conceptual and conscious processing, leading to dismissal of unconscious emotion. I question whether simply updating a symbolic cognitive framework is sufficient to capture the recent empirical and theoretical developments in emotion research. It might be time for a new modal and embodied theory of emotion.

Keywords

consciousness embodiment emotion symbolic

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.

Niedenthal, P.M. , Barsalou, L.W. , Winkielman, P. , Krauth-Gruber, S. , & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184-211.

Ortony, A. , Clore, G.L. , & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Winkielman, P. , Berridge, K.C. , & Wilbarger, J.L. (2005). Emotion, behavior, and conscious experience: Once more without feeling. In L. Feldman-Barrett , P. Niedenthal , & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Emotion and consciousness (pp. 335-362). New York: Guilford.

Winkielman, P. , & Schooler, J. (2008). Unconscious, conscious, and meta-conscious in social cognition. In F. Strack & J. Förster (Eds.), Social cognition: The basis of human interaction (pp. 49-69). Philadelphia : Psychology Press.