For appraisal to be a likely cause of automatically elicited emotions, we not only need to account for how appraisals can occur automatically, but also how emotional experience can follow from appraised meaning in an automatic fashion. The simplest way to construe this is to assume that emotional feeling directly reflects the appraised meaning and its implications. Emotional feeling should be distinguished from verbally categorizing and labeling the experience, however, for understanding the relationship between appraisals and emotion terms.
Barrett, L.F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K.N., & Gross, J.J. ( 2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373-403.
2.
Frijda, N.H. ( 2007). The laws of emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Rijmen, F. ( 2008). Towards disentangling sources of individual differences in appraisal and anger. Journal of Personality, 76, 969-1000.
4.
Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D.J.M., De Boeck, P., & Ceulemans, E. ( 2007). Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 689-713.
5.
Moors, A. ( 2009). Theories of emotion causation: A review. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 625-662.
6.
Moors, A. ( 2010). Automatic constructive appraisal as a candidate cause of emotion. Emotion Review, 2(2), 139-156.
7.
Parkinson, B. ( 1999). Relations and dissociations between appraisal and emotion ratings of reasonable and unreasonable anger and guilt. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 347-385.
8.
Scherer, K.R. ( 2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the Component Process Model. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1,307-1,351.
9.
Van Mechelen, I., & Hennes, K. ( 2009). The appraisal basis of anger occurrence and intensity revisited. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1,373-1,388.
