The aerodynamic drag and axial rotation of an arrow

Abstract

The down-range behaviour of arrows has a strong influence on an archer’s ability to obtain good scores. A major input to that performance is the arrow’s aerodynamic drag. A wide variety of arrow types are available, and within each type there are a number of sizes and combinations of the various component parts of the arrow. Consequently the drag can be expected to vary significantly from arrow to arrow. In addition, the arrow’s fletching is usually set at an angle to the shaft’s longitudinal axis, causing the arrow to spin in order to minimize inaccuracies due to, for example, arrow straightness variation, and this will also affect the down-range behaviour. This paper provides a means of calculating the arrow’s drag and axial spin, and uses that to compare predicted down-range velocity with that measured for three quite different, but representative arrows. The method is compared with methods developed by Rheingans and Liston.

Keywords

compound bow arrow drag axial spin

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ascham

Toxophilus – The school of shooting, 1545 (Obscure Press). ISBN 978 1 84664 369 9.

English

F. L.

The exterior ballistics of an arrow. J. Franklin Inst., 1930, 210, 805.

Rheingans

W. R.

Exterior and interior ballistics of bows and arrows. Archery Rev., 1936, March–April. Also published in Archery: the technical side (Eds Hickman

C. N.

Nagler

Klopsteg

P. E.

), 1947 (National Field Archery Association).

Klopsteg

P. E.

The flight of an arrow. Archery Rev., 1932, November. Also published in Archery: the technical side (Eds Hickman

C. N.

Nagler

Klopsteg

P. E.

), 1947 (National Field Archery Association).

Liston

T. L.

Physical laws of archery, 1988 (Liston and Associates, San Jose).

Hoerner

S. F.

Fluid-dynamic drag, 1965 (published by the author).

Zanevskyy

Mechanical and mathematical modelling of sport archery arrow ballistics. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport, 2008, 7(1), 40–49.

Park

J. L.

The behaviour of an arrow shot from a compound archery bow. Proc. IMechE, Part P: J. Sports Engineering and Technology, 2011, 225, 8–21. DOI: 10.1177/17543371JSET8210.1177/17543371JSET82.

Willmarth

W. W.

Winkel

R. E.

Sharma

L. K.

Bogar

T. J.

Axially symmetric boundary layers on cylinders: mean velocity profiles and wall pressure fluctuations. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1976, 76(1), 35–64.

10.

Olsen

R. M.

Engineering fluid mechanics, 1967 (International Textbook Company).

11.

Klopsteg

P. E.

Physics of bows and arrows. Am. J. Physics, 1943, 11(4), 175–192.

12.

Caplan

Gardner

T. N.

A mathematical model of the oar blade–water interaction in rowing. J. Sports Sci., 2007, 25(9), 1025–1034.

13.

Park

J. L.

A compound archery bow dynamic model, suggesting modifications to improve accuracy. Proc. IMechE, Part P: J. Sports Engineering and Technology, 2009, 223(4), 139–150. DOI: 10.1243/1754337JSET4810.1243/1754337JSET48.

14.

Park

J. L.

Arrow behaviour in free flight. Proc. IMechE, Part P: J. Sports Engineering and Technology, 2011, in press. DOI: 10.1177/175433711139854210.1177/1754337111398542