This paper describes the design optimization of a sport shoe sole structure by evolutionary computation coupled with eigenmode analysis based on the finite element method. A genetic algorithm assisted by the Kriging response surface model was used for global and efficient optimization. The present study implemented two optimization cases based on equivalent design problem formulations: the single-objective constrained problem and multi-objective non-constrained problem. The optimization described here provided a midsole structure with optimal material properties, in which the elastic modulus should be reduced in rearfoot→midfoot→forefoot-centre domains sequentially as the midsole weight becomes lighter. In addition, a comparison of the results between the two cases yielded insight into constraint handling for faster convergence in midsole design optimization by evolutionary computation.
FrederickE. C.Kinematically mediated effects of sport shoe design: A review. J. Sports Sci., 1986, 4(3), 169–184.
2.
McPoilT. G.Athletic footwear: Design, performance and selection issues. J. Sci. Med. Sport, 2000, 3(3), 260–267.
3.
CurtisC. K.LaudnerK. G.McLodaT. A.McCawS. T.The role of shoe design in ankle sprain rates among collegiate basketball players. J. Athl. Train., 2008, 43(3), 230–233.
4.
NishidaM.IsobeM.NishiwakiT.Influence of sole stiffness on ground reaction force in running. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Sports Engineering and Symposium on Human Dynamics, 2005, pp. 66–69 (in Japanese).
5.
NakayaS.NishidaM.NishiwakiT.Sole stiffness designing method corresponding to running velocity. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Sports Engineering and Symposium on Human Dynamics, 2006, pp. 236–239 (in Japanese).
6.
NishiwakiT.Application of computational engineering to practical athletic shoe designing. J. Japan Soc. Comput. Engng Sci., 2007, 12(4), 1677–1680 (in Japanese).
7.
GoldbergD. E.Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, 1989 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts).
8.
KennedyJ.EberthartR. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Neural networks, IEEE Service Center, 1995, 1942–1948.
9.
ObayashiS.JeongS.ChibaK. Multi-objective design exploration for aerodynamic configurations. In Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA, 2005 (invited paper).
10.
JeongS.ChibaK.ObayashiS.Data mining for aerodynamic design space. J. Aerospace Comput. Inform. Commun., 2005, 2(11), 452–469.
11.
JeongS.MinemuraY.ObayashiS.Optimization of combustion chamber for diesel engine using Kriging model. J. Fluid Sci. Technol., 2006, 1(2), 138–146.
12.
JeongS.HasegawaS.ShimoyamaK.ObayashiS.Development and investigation of efficient GA/PSO-hybrid algorithm applicable to real-world design optimization. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag., 2009, 4(3), 36–44.
13.
SatoK.KumanoT.YonezawaM.YamashitaH.JeongS.ObayashiS.Low-boom and low-drag optimization of the twin engine version of silent supersonic business jet. J. Fluid Sci. Technol., 2008, 3(4), 576–585.
14.
ShimoyamaK.LimJ. N.JeongS.ObayashiS.KoishiM.Practical implementation of robust design assisted by response surface approximation and visual data-mining. J. Mech. Design Trans. ASME, 2009, 131(6), 061007–1–11.
McKayM. D.BeckmanR. J.ConoverW. J.A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 1979, 21(2), 239–245.
18.
SacksJ.WelchW. J.MitchellT. J.WynnH. P.Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci., 1989, 4(4), 409–435.
19.
JonesD. R.SchonlauM.WelchW. J.Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box function. J. Global Optim., 1998, 13, 455–492.
20.
FonsecaC. M.FlemingP. J.Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic algorithms, 1993, pp. 416–423 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California).
21.
DebK.Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, 2001 (Wiley, Chichester).
22.
BakerJ. E.Reducing bias and inefficiency in the selection algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Genetic algorithms, 1987, pp. 41–49 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California).
23.
EshelmanL. J.The CHC adaptive search algorithm: How to have safe search when engaging in nontraditional genetic recombination. In Foundations of genetic algorithms, 1991, pp. 265–283 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California).
24.
TsutsuiS.FujimotoY.Forking genetic algorithms with blocking and shrinking modes (fGA). In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic algorithms, 1993, pp. 206–213 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California).
RousseeuwP. J.Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 1987, 20(1), 53–65.
27.
OyamaA.ShimoyamaK.FujiiK.New constraint-handling method for multi-objective and multi-constraint evolutionary optimization. Trans. Japan Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci., 2007, 50(167), 56–62.
28.
NishiwakiT.The evaluation method of cushioning property based on the numerical simulation. In Proceedings of the 6th Japan International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, 1999, pp. 775–778.
