Racing car chassis optimization using the finite element method,multi-body dynamic simulation and data acquisition

Abstract

This paper presents an optimization methodology applicable to racing car chassis. The proposed procedure is sequentially structured, and starts with analysis of an existing vehicle, goes through an intermediate prototype and finishes with a final design. It is applied to a real case, the redesign of a steel tubular chassis for the ‘Copa de España de vehículos CM’, as part of a full vehicle development. The dynamic response of the existing chassis is modelled using finite element application techniques for structural design and validated with lab tests. In this way, through various modifications using basic static load cases for primary optimization, a completely new design (intermediate) is defined. Then a prototype is built, instrumented and tested in real field conditions (road and circuit). With acquired data from the dynamic behaviour of the car (suspension, steering, engine and transmission, etc.), using multi-body dynamic simulation software, an optimized load case is put forward in order to refine the first prototype. The ultimate goal is a chassis with much increased torsional and bending stiffness, with minimum weight gain, with regard to its interaction with the suspension and steering systems and to the manufacturing feasibility. It is shown that, with an adequate chassis elements configuration, stiffness can be increased by a 300% with just a 5% weight gain. The proposed methodology can be extended to other design (or re-engineering) procedures with rigid limitations in time and resources.

Keywords

Racing car optimization methodology finite element multi-body system test

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Donders

. The robustness of dynamic vehicle performance to spot weld failures. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2006; 42: 670–682.

Nikolaidis

Zhu

. Design of automotive joints: using neural networks and optimization to translate performance requirements to physical design parameters. Computers & Structures 1996; 60(6): 989–1001.

El Madany

Abduljabbar

. Linear quadratic Gaussian control of a quarter-car suspension. Vehicle System Dynamics 1999; 32(6): 479–497.

Sancaktar

Gratton

. Design, analysis, and optimization of composite leaf springs for light vehicle applications. Composite Structures 1999; 44: 195–204.

Simionescu

Beale

. Synthesis and analysis of the five-link rear suspension system used in automobiles. Mechanism and Machine Theory 2002; 37: 815–832.

Shieh

N-C

. Optimal design for passive suspension of a light rail vehicle using constrained multiobjective evolutionary search. J Sound and Vibration 2005; 285: 407–424.

Jazar

Alkhatib

Golnaraghi

. Root mean square optimization criterion for vibration behaviour of linear quarter car using analytical methods. Vehicle System Dynamics 2006; 44(6): 477–512.

Sun

Cai

Yang

. Genetic algorithm-based optimum vehicle suspension design using minimum dynamic pavement load as a design criterion. J Sound and Vibration 2007; 301: 18–27.

Akbulut

. On optimization of a car rim using finite element method. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2003; 39: 433–443.

10.

Jahed

. A numerical optimization technique for design of wheel profiles. Wear 2008; 264: 1–10.

11.

Siefert

Pankoke

Wölfel

H-P

. Virtual optimisation of car passenger seats: simulation of static and dynamic effects on drivers’ seating comfort. Int J Industrial Ergonomics 2008; 38(5–6): 410–424.

12.

Forsberg

Nilsson

. Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization. Int J Impact Engng 2006; 32: 759–777.

13.

Zhang

Zhu

Chen

. Lightweight design of automotive front side rail based on robust optimisation. Thin-Walled Structures 2007; 45: 670–676.

14.

Rauh

. Virtual development of ride and handling characteristics for advanced passenger cars. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int J Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 2003; 40(1–3): 135–155.

15.

Huang

S-J

Chen

H-Y

. Adaptive sliding controller with self-tuning fuzzy compensation for vehicle suspension control Mechatronics 2006;16: 607–622.

16.

Fleury

Mistrot

. Numerical assessment of fore-and-aft suspension performance to reduce whole-body vibration of wheel loader drivers. J Sound and Vibration 2006; 298: 672–687.

17.

Gobbi

Levi

Mastinu

. Multi-objective stochastic optimisation of the suspension system of road vehicles. J Sound and Vibration 2006; 298: 1055–1072.

18.

Habibi

Shirazi

Shishesaz

. Roll steer minimization of McPherson-strut suspension system using genetic algorithm method. Mechanism and Machine Theory 2008; 43: 57–67.

19.

Jonasson

Roos

. Design and evaluation of an active electromechanical wheel suspension system. Mechatronics 2008; 18(4): 218–230.

20.

Els

. Gradient-based approximation methods applied to the optimal design of vehicle suspension systems using computational models with severe inherent noise. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2006; 43: 787–801.

21.

Yang

. Study on ride comfort of tractor with tandem suspension based on multi-body system dynamics. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2007; 33(1): 11–33.

22.

Pierre

. Advanced structure methodologies for next generation ground vehicles. Int J Heavy Vehicle Systems 2004; 11(3/4): 257–302.

23.

Choa

Y-B

. A vehicle front frame crash design optimization using hole-type and dent-type crush initiator. Thin-Walled Structures 2006; 44: 415–428.

24.

Avalle

Chiandussi

. Optimisation of a vehicle energy absorbing steel component with experimental validation. Int J Impact Engng, 2007; 34: 843–858.

25.

Proceedings of the 1st international crashworthiness conference (IJCrash), The Dearborn Inn, Dearborn, Michigan, 9–11 September 1998.

26.

Yang

. A numerical study of crash optimization. In: 1999 ASME design engineering technical conference, Las Vegas, NV. ASME, New York. 1999, DETC 99/DAC-8590.

27.

Hamid

. Optimization of a modular cockpit cross car beam for crashworthiness. SAE Paper 2002-01-0938, 2002.

28.

Zhang

. Improved design of the main energy-absorbing automotive parts based on traffic accident analysis. Mater Des 2008; 29: 403–410.

29.

Faruk Kececi

Tao

. Adaptive vehicle skid control. Mechatronics 2006; 16: 291–301.

30.

Zhenga

. Controller design for vehicle stability enhancement. Control Engng Practice 2006; 14: 1413–1421.

31.

Papadopoulos

Grante

. Evolving car designs using model-based automated safety analysis and optimisation techniques. J Systems and Software 2005; 76: 77–89.

32.

Le-Anh

De Koster

MBM

. A review of design and control of automated guided vehicle systems. Eur J Opl Res 2006; 171: 1–23.

33.

Zhanga

Cai

. Load distribution and dynamic response of multi-girder bridges with FRP decks. Engineering Structures 2007; 29: 1676–1689.

34.

Mántaras

Luque

Vera

. A three-dimensional kinematic model for compound crank axle suspension mechanism. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2003; 217: 115–123.

35.

Mántaras

Luque

Vera

. Development and validation of a 3-dimensional kinematic model for the McPherson steering and suspension mechanisms. J Mechanism and Machine Theory 2004; 39(6): 603–619.

36.

Lee

S-L

. Integrated process for structural–topological configuration design of weight-reduced vehicle components. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2007; 43: 620–629.

37.

Nocedal

Wright

. Numerical optimization. Springer, New York, 1999.

38.

Torstenfelt

Klarbring

. Conceptual optimal design of modular car product families using simultaneous size, shape and topology optimization. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2007; 43: 1050–1061.

39.

Chang

K-H

Joo

S-H

. Design parameterization and tool integration for CAD-based mechanism optimization. Adv Engng Software 2006; 37: 779–796.