Laboratory evaluation of a wearable head impact sensor for use in water polo and land sports

Abstract

The SIM-G is a waterproof head impact sensor that has been previously evaluated for use in a headband, but not yet in a mode of attachment suitable for water polo. For this study, a CADEX linear impactor was used to impact a Hybrid III headform while wearing either a headband or modified water polo cap, each housing a SIM-G. In both headgears, the SIM-G consistently underestimated peak linear acceleration (p < .001) and peak rotational velocity (p < .001), and consistently overestimated peak rotational acceleration (p < .001) relative to the headform. These inaccuracies are consistent with previous evaluations of the SIM-G, but notably, impact magnitudes did not differ between the different modes of attachment (p > .198). The proprietary SIM-G algorithm used for classifying false/true positives performed poorly at the back and crown impact locations in both the water polo cap and headband, but accuracy of this algorithm did not significantly differ between the water polo cap and headband (60.5% vs 49.4%, respectively). The SIM-G’s ability to correctly predict impact location also performed poorly in both headgears when impacts occurred at the crown location, but was significantly better overall in the water polo cap than the headband (80.2% vs 55.6%, respectively). These results demonstrate that the SIM-G exhibits shared limitations and a similar performance overall when placed in either a headband or water polo cap. Potential explanations for the inaccuracies of the SIM-G, as well as methods of optimizing its application in sports, are discussed.

Keywords

Head acceleration headgear kinematics biomechanics concussion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Daneshvar

Nowinski

McKee

, et al. The epidemiology of sport-related concussion. Clin Sport Med 2011; 30(1): 1–17.

Gessel

Fields

Collins

, et al. Concussions among United States high school and collegiate athletes. J Athl Train 2007; 42(4): 495–503.

Langlois

Rutland-Brown

Wald

MM.

The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehab 2006; 21(5): 375–378.

Kiraly

SJ.

Traumatic brain injury and delayed sequelae: a review- traumatic brain injury and mild traumatic brain injury (concussion) are precursors to later-onset brain disorders, including early-onset dementia. Sci World J 2007; 7: 1768–1776.

Bazarian

Zhu

Zhong

, et al. Persistent, long-term cerebral white matter changes after sports-related repetitive head impacts. PLoS ONE 2014; 9(4): e94734.

Montenigro

Alosco

Martin

, et al. Cumulative head impact exposure predicts later-life depression, apathy, executive dysfunction, and cognitive impairment in former high school and college football players. J Neurotrauma 2017; 34(2): 328–340.

Talavage

Nauman

Breedlove

, et al. Functionally-detected cognitive impairment in high school football players without clinically-diagnosed concussion. J Neurotraum 2014; 31(4): 327–338.

Beckwith

Greenwald

Chu

, et al. Head impact exposure sustained by football players on days of diagnosed concussion. Med Sci Sport Exer 2013; 45(4): 737–746.

Broglio

Surma

Ashton-Miller

JA.

High school and collegiate football athlete concussions: a biomechanical review. Ann Biomed Eng 2012; 40(1): 37–46.

10.

Lamond

Caccese

Buckley

, et al. Linear acceleration in direct head contact across impact type, player position, and playing scenario in collegiate women’s soccer players. J Athl Train 2018; 53(2): 115–121.

11.

Reynolds

Patrie

Henry

, et al. Quantifying head impacts in collegiate lacrosse. Am J Sport Med 2016; 44(11): 2947–2956.

12.

Wilcox

Beckwith

Greenwald

, et al. Head impact exposure in male and female collegiate ice hockey players. J Biomech 2014; 47(1): 109–114.

13.

King

Yang

Zhang

, et al. Is head injury caused by linear or angular acceleration. In: Proceedings of IRCOBI conference, Lisbon, 2003.

14.

Rowson

Duma

SM.

Brain injury prediction: assessing the combined probability of concussion using linear and rotational head acceleration. Ann Biomed Eng 2013; 41(5): 873–882.

15.

Patton

DA.

A review of instrumented equipment to investigate head impacts in sport. Appl Bionics Biomech 2016; 2016: 7049743.

16.

O’Connor

Rowson

Duma

, et al. Head-impact–measurement devices: a systematic review. J Athl Train 2017; 52(3): 206–227.

17.

Cecchi

Monroe

Fote

, et al. Head impacts sustained by male collegiate water polo athletes. PLoS ONE 2019; 14(5): e0216369.

18.

Blumenfeld

Winsell

Hicks

, et al. The epidemiology of sports-related head injury and concussion in water polo. Front Neurol 2016; 7: 98.

19.

Mountjoy

Junge

Alonso

, et al. Sports injuries and illnesses in the 2009 FINA World Championships (Aquatics). Brit J Sport Med 2010; 44(7): 522–527.

20.

Funk

Cormier

Bain

, et al. Validation and application of a methodology to calculate head accelerations and neck loading in soccer ball impacts. SAE technical paper 2009-01-0251, 2009.

21.

Tyson

Duma

Rowson

Laboratory evaluation of low-cost wearable sensors for measuring head impacts in sports. J Appl Biomech 2018; 34(4): 320–326.

22.

Hayes

AF.

Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications, 2017.

23.

Hayes

AF.

PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. White paper, 2012, http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

24.

Cummiskey

Schiffmiller

Talavage

, et al. Reliability and accuracy of helmet-mounted and head-mounted devices used to measure head accelerations. Proc IMechE Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology 2017; 231(2): 144–153.

25.

Laksari

Kuo

, et al. Bandwidth and sample rate requirements for wearable head impact sensors. J Biomech 2016; 49(13): 2918–2924.

26.

Ovaska

Valiviita

Angular acceleration measurement: a review. In: IMTC/98 conference proceedings. IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference. Where instrumentation is going, vol. 2, St. Paul, MN, 18–21 May 1998, pp.875–880. New York: IEEE.

27.

Greenwald

Gwin

Chu

, et al. Head impact severity measures for evaluating mild traumatic brain injury risk exposure. Neurosurgery 2008; 62(4): 789–798.

28.

Kendall

Walsh

Hoshizaki

TB.

Comparison between Hybrid III and Hodgson–WSU headforms by linear and angular dynamic impact response. Proc IMechE Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology 2012; 226(3–4): 260–265.

29.

Cobb

MacAlister

Young

, et al. Quantitative comparison of hybrid III and national operating committee on standards for athletic equipment headform shape characteristics and implications on football helmet fit. Proc IMechE Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology 2015; 229(1): 39–46.

30.

Oeur

Karton

Hoshizaki

. Impact frequency validation of head impact sensor technology for use in sport. In: 34th international conference on biomechanics in sports, Tsukuba, Japan, 18–22 July 2016.

31.

Cortes

Lincoln

Myer

, et al. Video analysis verification of head impact events measured by wearable sensors. Am J Sport Med 2017; 45(10): 2379–2387.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.48 MB