The Winter Olympics are a highly competitive sporting environment where subtle improvements in performance can impact the finishing order in many events. Aerodynamic drag is known to be a significant resistive force to human movement in high-speed sports, such as alpine skiing, speed skating and bobsleigh. Aerodynamic drag also represents an important determinant of performance in sports such as ice hockey, snowboard cross and cross-country skiing. From 2000 to 2018, a series of wind tunnel–based research projects were conducted to provide aerodynamically optimized apparel, equipment and wind tunnel simulation training to elite Canadian and American winter sports athletes involved in bobsleigh, skeleton, luge, ice hockey, speed skating, cross-country, alpine and para-alpine skiing, biathlon, ski-cross and snowboard cross. This article reviews the role of aerodynamic drag in winter sports, considers fundamental principles of air flow around bluff bodies and methods of drag reduction in ice and snow sports, while providing experimental results from an extensive database of wind tunnel investigations. Deficits in the literature suggest productive areas for future research to improve athletic performance in these sports.
KyleCBrownlieLHarberE, et al. The Nike swift spin cycling project: reducing the aerodynamic drag of bicycle racing clothing by using zoned fabrics. In: HubbardMMehtaRPallisJ (eds) The engineering of sport 5. Sheffield: The International Sports Engineering Association, 2004, pp.118–124.
4.
CrouchTBurtonDLaBryZ, et al. Riding against the wind: a review of competition cycling aerodynamics. Sports Eng2017; 20: 81–110.
5.
Van Ingen SchneauG. The influence of air friction in speed skating. J Biomech1982; 15: 449–458.
6.
SaetranLOggianoL. Skin suit aerodynamics in speed skating. In: NorstrudH (ed.) International centre for mechanical sciences courses and lectures – no. 506: sports aerodynamics. New York: SpringerWein, 2008, pp.93–105.
7.
BrownlieLKyleCHarberE, et al. Reducing the aerodynamic drag of sports apparel: development of the NIKE Swift sprint running and SwiftSkin speed skating suits. In: HubbardMMehtaRPallisJ (eds) The engineering of sport 5. Sheffield: The International Sports Engineering Association, 2004, pp.90–96.
8.
BrownlieLKyleC. Evidence that skin suits affect long track speed skating performance. Proc Eng2012; 34: 26–31.
9.
MelziSBelloniESabbioniE. Alpine ski. In: BraghinFCheliFMaldifassiS, et al. (eds) The engineering approach to winter sports. New York: Springer, 2016, pp.53–107.
10.
NorstrudH. Cross-country skiing. In: NorstrudH (ed.) International centre for mechanical sciences courses and lectures – no. 506 sports aerodynamics. New York: SpringerWein, 2008, pp.107–138.
11.
MaenoN. Ice and snow for winter sports. In: BraghinFCheliFMaldifassiS, et al. (eds) The engineering approach to winter sports. New York: Springer, 2016, pp.1–17.
12.
NachbauerWKapsPHaslerM, et al. Friction between ski and snow. In: BraghinFCheliFMaldifassiS, et al. (eds) The engineering approach to winter sports. New York: Springer, 2016, pp.18–32.
13.
BraghinFBelloniEMelziS, et al. Friction between runner and ice. In: BraghinFCheliFMaldifassiS, et al. (eds) The engineering approach to winter sports. New York: Springer, 2016, pp.33–52.
14.
DaviesC. Effects of wind assistance and resistance on the forward motion of a runner. J Appl Physiol1980; 48: 702–709.
15.
BrancazioP. Physics and sports: the aerodynamics of projectiles. In: HallidayDResnickR (eds) Fundamentals of physics. 3rd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988, pp. 1–E6.
16.
D’AuteuilA. Manipulation of the boundary layer transition to enhance the aerodynamic performance of athletes. PhD Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2010.
17.
MureikaJ. The effects of temperature, humidity and barometric pressure on short sprint race times. Cdn J Physics2006; 84(4): 311–324.
18.
SimuEScanlanR. Wind effects on structures: an introduction to wind engineering. Toronto, ON, Canada: Wiley Interscience, 1978.
19.
BrownlieL. Aerodynamic characteristics of sports apparel. PhD Thesis, School of Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada, 1992.
20.
AchenbachE. Influence of surface roughness on the cross-flow around a circular cylinder. J Fluid Mech1971; 46(2): 321–335.
21.
KyleC. How wind affects cycling. Bicycling1988; 29(5): 194–204.
22.
BearmanP. Near wake flows behind two-and three-dimensional bluff bodies. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam1997; 69: 33–54.
ZdravkovichM. Flow around circular cylinders: fundamentals, vol. 1. New York: Oxford Science Publications, 1997.
26.
AchenbachE. Distribution of local pressure and skin friction around a circular cylinder in cross-flow up to Re = 5 x 106. J Fluid Mech1968; 34: 625–639.
27.
HoernerS. Fluid-dynamic drag: practical information on aerodynamic drag and hydrodynamic resistance. Midland Park, NJ: Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, 1965.
28.
BrownlieL. Design considerations in wind tunnel testing of cyclists. In: PallisJMcNitt-GrayJShoaneG (eds) Biomedical principles and applications in sports. Cham: Springer Nature, 2020, pp.57–86.
29.
FageAWarsapJH. The effects of turbulence and surface roughness on the drag of a circular cylinder. Reports and Memoranda No. 1283. London: Aeronautical Research Committee, 1930.
30.
BrownlieLKyleCCarboJ, et al. Streamlining the time trial apparel of cyclists: the Nike Swift Spin project. Sports Tech2009; 2: 53–60.
31.
BrownlieLGartshoreIChapmanA, et al. The aerodynamics of cycling apparel. Cycling Science1991; 3(3–4): 44–50.
32.
OggianoLBrownlieLTroynikovO, et al. A review on skin suits and sport garment aerodynamics: guidelines and state of the art. Proc Eng2013; 60: 91–98.
33.
UnderwoodLJermyMC. Fabric testing for cycling skinsuits. Proc Eng2011; 13: 350–356.
34.
BardalLOggianoLTroynikovO, et al. Influence of fabric structural attributes on their aerodynamic behavior. J Eng Fiber Fabr2013; 8: 112–124.
35.
OggianoLSaetranL. Experimental analysis on parameters affecting drag force on speed skaters. Sports Tech2012; 3: 4223–4234.
36.
D’AuteuilALaroseGZanS. The effect of motion on wind tunnel drag measurement for athletes. Proc Eng2012; 34: 62–67.
37.
D’AuteuilALaroseGZanS. Relevance of similitude parameters for drag reduction in sport aerodynamics. Proc Eng2010; 2: 2393–2398.
38.
NilssonHAnttonenHHolmerI. New algorithms for prediction of wind effects on cold protective clothing. In: KuklaneKHolmerI (eds) 1st European conference on protective clothing, vol. 8. Stockholm: Arbete och Halsa, 2000, pp.17–20.
39.
WatanabeTKatoTKamataY, et al. The air flow around a clothed cylinder (Part 1 An experiment on the outer flow field). Sen-i Gakkaishi Trans1989; 45: 175–182.
40.
HoldenH. The aerodynamics of skiing, the technology of winning. Sci Amer1988; 258: T4–T8.
41.
BardalLMReidR. Testing of fabrics for use in alpine ski competition suits. Proc Eng2012; 34: 44–49.
42.
BrownlieLLaroseGD’AuteuilA, et al. Factors affecting the aerodynamic drag of alpine skiers. Proc Eng2010; 2: 2375–2380.
43.
BardalLMOggianoLSaetranL, et al. Comparison of aerodynamic properties of wool and polyester knitted textiles. Proc Eng2011; 13: 363–369.
44.
ChuaJFussFTroynikovO. Aerodynamics of loose sports garments. Proc Eng2011; 13: 370–375.
45.
PostmaITimmerN. Everything about strips. Speedskating World1998; 8: 22–25.
46.
BrownlieLAiharaYCarboJ, et al. The use of vortex generators to reduce the aerodynamic drag of athletic apparel. Proc Eng2016; 147: 20–25.
47.
DebrauxPGrappeFManolovaA, et al. Aerodynamic drag in cycling: methods of assessment. Sports Biomech2011; 10(3): 197–218.
48.
Garcia-LopezJOgueta-AldayALarrazabalJ, et al. The use of velodrome tests to evaluate aerodynamic drag in professional cyclists. Int J. Sports Med2014; 35: 451–455.
49.
WinklerAPernpeintnerA. Improving the performance of a bobsleigh by aerodynamic optimization. In: EstivaletM (ed.) The engineering of sport 7, vol. 2. Paris: Springer, 2008, pp.329–338.
50.
WinklerAPernpeintnerA. Automated aerodynamic optimization of the position and posture of a bobsleigh crew. Proc Eng2010; 2(2): 2399–2405
51.
SabbioniEMelziSCheliF, et al. Bobsleigh and skeleton. In: BraghinFCheliFMaldifassiS, et al. (eds) The engineering approach to winter sports. New York: Springer, 2016, pp.183–272.
52.
MannionPToparlarYBlockenB, et al. Improving CFD prediction of drag on Paralympic tandem athletes: influence of grid resolution and turbulence model. Sports Eng2018; 21: 123–125.
HastingsR. The use of computational fluid dynamics to investigate and improve the aerodynamics of bob skeleton racing. M.Eng Thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 2008.
55.
KatzJ. Race car aerodynamics: designing for speed. 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: Bentley Publishers, 2006.
56.
ChowdhuryHAlamFMainwaringD, et al. Rapid prototyping of high performance sportswear. Proc Eng2012; 34: 38–43.
57.
MullerW. Performance factors in ski jumping. In: NorstrudH (ed.) International centre for mechanical sciences courses and lectures – no. 506 sports aerodynamics. New York: SpringerWein, 2008, pp.139–160.
58.
MullerW. Computer simulation of ski jumping based on wind tunnel data. In: NorstrudH (ed.) International centre for mechanical sciences courses and lectures – no. 506 sports aerodynamics. New York: SpringerWein, 2008, pp.161–182.
59.
MeileWMullerWReisenbergerE. Ski-jumping aerodynamics: model-experiments and CFD simulations. In: NorstrudH (ed.) International centre for mechanical sciences courses and lectures – no. 506 sports aerodynamics. New York: SpringerWein, 2008, pp.183–217.
60.
VirmavirtaM. Aerodynamics of ski jumping. In: BraghinFCheliFMaldifassiS, et al. (eds) The engineering approach to winter sports. New York: Springer, 2016, pp.33–52.
61.
Van ValkenburghP. The aerodynamics of the bobsled. Sci Amer1988; 258: T10–T14.
62.
LewisO. Aerodynamics analysis of a 2-Man Bobsleigh. MSc Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2006.
63.
ShimH-SJungH-YKimK-Y, et al. Effects of geometric parameters of a bobsleigh on aerodynamic performance. Trans KSME C: Indus Tech Innov2015; 3(3): 233–240.
64.
MotallebiFDabnichkiPLuckD. Advanced bobsleigh design. Part 2: aerodynamic modifications to a two-man bobsleigh. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Mater Des Appl2004; 218(2): 139–144.
65.
SciacchitanoAPattnaikP. Near wake analysis of a two-man bobsleigh scaled model. MDPI Proc2018; 2: 319.
66.
ChowdhuryHAlamFArenaS, et al. An experimental study of airflow behaviour around a standard 2-man bobsleigh. Proc Eng2013; 60: 479–484.
67.
DabnichkiPAvitalE. Influence of the position of crew members on aerodynamics performance of two-man bobsleigh. J Biomech2006; 39(15): 2733–2742.
68.
BaerJ. Reshaping a Bo-Dyne 2 man bobsleigh to cut air resistance and improve run time. Wind Tunnel Test No. UWAL 1503. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, 1993.
69.
BarryN. A new method for analysing the effect of environmental wind on real world aerodynamic performance in cycling. MDPI Proc2018; 2: 211.
70.
RobertsI. Skeleton bobsleigh mechanics: athlete-sled interaction. PhD Thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 2013.
71.
RocheJTurnockSWrightS. An analysis of the interaction between slider physique and descent time for the bob skeleton. Eng Sport2008; 7(2): 101–109.
72.
ZanolettiCLa TorreAMeratiG, et al. Relationship between push phase and final race time in skeleton performance. J Strength Cond Res2006; 20(3): 570–583.
BruggemannGMorlockMZatsiorskyV. Analysis of the bobsled and men’s luge events at the XVII Olympic winter games in Lillehammer. J Appl Biomech1997; 13(1): 98–108.
77.
SakaiK. The parametric study for the luge game to get the high record at the Olympic game. Research Report No. 25. First Industrial University, 2013, pp.7–10, https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40019800473/en/ (accessed 28 July 2018).
78.
DulliandGGarryK. The basic aerodynamic characteristics of a model luge slider. Abstract. In: 5th international colloquium on bluff body aerodynamics and applications (BBAA V), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 11–15 July 2004. Oxford: Elsevier.
79.
HanB-HChaJ-HKimH, et al. Effects of geometric parameters of a luge on aerodynamic performance. Korean Soc Mech Eng2016: 1039–1045.
80.
ReidyL. Flat plate drag reduction in a water tunnel using riblets. Technical Report 1169. San Diego, CA: United States Navy, Naval Ocean Systems Center, 1987.
81.
WalshMAndersJ. Riblet/LEBU research at NASA Langley. App Sci Res1989; 46: 255–262.
HachéA. The physics of hockey. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
84.
De KoningJGrootGVan Ingen SchenauG. Ice friction during speed skating. J Biomech1992; 25(6): 565–571.
85.
KyleC. A math model of hockey using average power: the effect of air resistance and weight upon performance while sprinting from a stop or steady skating. Report, Nike Inc, March2004.
86.
Van Ingen SchneauJGDe KoningJDe GrootJ. A simulation of speed skating performances based on a power equation. Med Sci Sports Exerc1990; 22: 718–728.
87.
TurcotteRRenaudPPearsallD. Ice hockey skate, stick design and performance measures. In: BraghinFCheliFMaldifassiS, et al. (eds) The engineering approach to winter sports. New York: Springer, 2016, pp.311–326.
88.
LomondKTurcotteRPearsallD. Three-dimensional analysis of blade contact in an ice hockey slap shot, in relation to player skill. Sports Eng2007; 10: 87–100.
89.
KuytCGreidanusAWesterweelJ. Drag reduction by applying speedstrips on rowing oars Proc Eng 2016; 147: 110–115.
90.
PearsallDMontgomeryDRothschingN, et al. The influence of stick stiffness on the performance of ice hockey slap shots. Sports Eng1999; 2: 3–11.
91.
BelloniESabbioniEMelziI, et al. Ice skating. In: BraghinFCheliFMaldifassiS, et al. (eds) The engineering approach to winter sports. New York: Springer, 2016, pp.277–306.
92.
TerraWSciacchitanoAScaranoF. A novel approach for skin suit aerodynamic optimization using local momentum deficit. MDPI Proc2018; 2: 222.
OggianoLSætranLBardalL, et al. Air permeability and drag crisis on high tech fabrics for cross-country ski competitions. Sports Tech2012; 3: 4223–4234.
95.
NorstrudH. Alpine downhill and speed skiing. In: NorstrudH (ed.) International centre for mechanical sciences courses and lectures – no. 506 sports aerodynamics. New York: SpringerWein, 2008, pp. 131–138.
LeirdalSSaetranLRoeleveldK, et al. Effects of body position on slide boarding performance by cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exer2006; 38(8): 1462–1469.
98.
AinegrenMJonssonP. Drag area, frontal area and drag coefficient in cross-country skiing techniques. MDPI Proc2018; 2: 313.
99.
SupejMSaetranLOggianoL, et al. Aerodynamic drag is not the major determinant of performance during giant slalom skiing at the elite level. Scan J Med Sci Sports2013; 23: e38–e47.
100.
MeyerFLe PelleyDBorraniF. Aerodynamic drag modeling of alpine skiers performing giant slalom turns. Med Sci Sports Exer2012; 44(6): 1109–1115.
101.
BarelleCRubyATavernierM. Experimental model of the aerodynamic drag coefficient in alpine skiing. J Appl Biomech2004; 20: 167–176.
102.
ElfmarkOBardalL. An empirical model of aerodynamic drag in alpine skiing. MDPI Proc2018; 2: 310.
103.
AsaiTHongSIjuinK. Flow visualization of downhill ski racers using computational fluid dynamics. Proc Eng2016; 147: 44–49.
104.
ThompsonBFriessWKnappIIK. Aerodynamics of speed skiers. Sports Eng2001; 4: 103–112.
