What critiques of just war theory can teach us about Rita Floyd’s theory of morally mandatory securitization

Abstract

Keywords

just war theory securitization racial contract just securitization theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brunstetter

(2012) Rousseau and the tensions of France’s Contrat d’Accueil et d’Intégration. Journal of Political Ideologies 17(1): 107–126.

Brunstetter

(2021) Just and Unjust Uses of Limited Force: A Moral Argument With Contemporary Illustrations. Oxford University Press.

Brunstetter

O’Driscoll

(2018) Conclusion. In: Brunstetter

O’Driscoll

(eds) Just War Thinkers: From Cicero to the 21st Century. Routledge, pp.250–256.

Burke

(2004) Just war or ethical peace? Moral discourses of strategic violence after 9/11. International Affairs 80(2): 329–353.

Enemark

(2014) Drones, risk, and perpetual force. Ethics & International Affairs 28(3): 365–381.

Floyd

(2024) The Duty to Secure: From Just to Mandatory Securitization. Cambridge University Press.

Hirschauer

(2025) ‘For nothing is fixed’: race and racism in simultaneous (de)securitization encounters. Critical Studies on Security. Epub ahead of print 2025. 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/21624887.2025.2529617.

Hutchings

(2019) Cosmopolitan just war and coloniality. In: Bell

(ed.) Empire, Race, and Global Justice. Cambridge University Press, pp.211–227.

Mills

(1997) The Racial Contract. Cornell University Press.

10.

Rousseau

(2003) On the Social Contract. (Tr. G. D. H. Cole). Dover Publications, Inc.

11.

Wolfendale

(2025) Charles W. Mills (1951–2021). In: Brunstetter

O'Driscoll

(eds) Just War Thinkers Revisited: Heretics, Humanists and Radicals. Routledge, pp.280–295.