Abstract
Pityriasis rosea is a benign self-limiting rash, usually lasting 6 to 8 weeks. In classic pityriasis rosea a ‘herald patch’ is the initial finding, a large oval patch usually found on the torso. Smaller, scaly oval pink eruptions follow after 1 to 2 weeks on the chest, back and limbs, and can resemble a Christmas tree pattern on the back. It is seen more commonly in women, with a higher incidence in pregnancy, and has an estimated prevalence of around 1.3%. The rash usually heals without scarring and often no treatment is required. Symptomatic treatment is used occasionally to alleviate pruritus. This article will explore different presentations of pityriasis rosea, how to make a diagnosis and the main management options.
Clinical case scenario
Emma Jenkins is 21 years old and reaching 24 weeks gestation in her first pregnancy. She attended the surgery a week ago having noticed a slightly itchy erythematous patch on her chest. She also had vaginal thrush symptoms and was treated with an anti-fungal pessary and given topical clotrimazole for the likely tinea patch. She attends today complaining of a widespread rash all over her torso which is uncomfortable and itchy. When you examine her there is a symmetrical rash over her torso and the typical Christmas tree distribution of pityriasis rosea. Her concerns include anxiety about possible harm to her baby and the uncomfortable pruritus. She asks if the treatment given for ringworm was incorrect.
Aetiology
Pityriasis rosea does not have a definite aetiology. Possible causes have been suggested, but none are confirmed. It has been linked with viral infections, as almost 70% of patients have a prodromal illness with sore throat, fever or gastrointestinal disturbance before the appearance of the herald patch (Drago et al., 2016). Reactivation of latent human herpes virus-6 and 7 has been implicated as a possible aetiological factor (Mahajan et al., 2016). Possible links have also been made, but not confirmed, between pityriasis rosea and some vaccinations such as bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG), influenza, pneumococcus and more recently to the covid-19 vaccine (Khan, 2023; Litchman et al., 2022).
Presentation and diagnosis
Pityriasis rosea is a benign rash and often occurs between the ages of 10 and 35 years. The disease course usually starts with the herald patch, seen in over half of cases. The patch is typically between 2 and 5 cm in diameter and is erythematous, often with an elevated scaling border (Fig. 1).

Herald patch of pityriasis rosea.
The herald patch can often be misdiagnosed as eczema or ringworm. Within 2 weeks, generalised pinkish scaly oval plaques form and are distributed symmetrically over the thorax, back, abdomen and sometimes the limbs. The lesions often have a collarette appearance to them, with the edges peripherally attached and lifted up near to the centre of the lesion. In pityriasis rosea, the scale does not extend to the border of the lesion as it does in tinea corporis. The plaques often follow the Langer's lines of cleavage forming a typical ‘fir tree’ or ‘Christmas tree’ distribution on the back (Fig. 2).

Christmas tree distribution of pityriasis rosea following Langer’s lines of cleavage.
Moderate-to-severe pruritus can affect up to half of patients with pityriasis rosea (Villalon-Gomez, 2018). The rash lasts 6 to 8 weeks on average, but can be prolonged for up to 3 months (Drago et al., 2016). Hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation of the skin can follow resolution of the rash. In darker skin, the herald patch tends to be a dark violet to deep brown colour and the following smaller lesions are more purple-to-brown in tone and appear as raised bumps on the skin (Fig. 3). Hyperpigmentation often follows, usually resolving within 6 to 12 months and is the most common morbidity from pityriasis rosea in patients with darker skin (Lawrence, 2022).

Purple/brown coloured lesions are more likely in patients with darker skin.
Pityriasis rosea is not considered to be contagious, and patients are not advised to isolate to avoid transmission. There have been a few reports of family members developing symptoms simultaneously. However, there is no clear evidence of an infectious cause for pityriasis rosea (Ashayer et al., 2018).
Atypical presentations
The classic presentation of pityriasis rosea makes diagnosis easy once the smaller lesions erupt. Atypical presentations, however, can present a diagnostic challenge and occur in approximately a fifth of cases. Atypical presentations include variety in morphology, distribution and natural courses. Some examples include:
Inverse distribution: The lesions are distributed on the extremities and flexural areas including axillae, groins, palms, soles, neck and face, sparing the trunk (Ermetcan et al., 2010) Relapsing: Relapse of pityriasis rosea is rare but is documented in approximately 3% of patients. Relapses usually occur within the first year. The herald patch will often be absent. The secondary lesions will be smaller and fewer in number. Further recurrences can occur (Drago et al., 2016) Persistent: Symptoms lasting longer than 3 months are classified as persistent pityriasis rosea. The eruptions usually persist for 3 to 6 months and can include oral lesions such as strawberry tongue, erythematous macular lesions or vesicular lesions (Urbina et al., 2017)
Other atypical presentations include an absent herald patch, a solitary herald patch without generalised eruptions or a herald patch being present in an atypical area, such as the sole of the foot. Variations in the morphology of the rash include urticarial pityriasis rosea, purpuric pityriasis rosea, follicular pityriasis rosea and vesicular pityriasis rosea.
Atypical presentations can be referred to Dermatology for help in diagnosis, with for example, dermoscopic evaluation using a triple-light source and skin biopsy. A biopsy confirming pityriasis rosea will show focal paraketosis, with or without acanthosis, spongiosis (perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes and histiocytes) and sometimes extravasation of red cells. Biopsies are characteristic, but not pathognomonic. Where tinea is suspected as an alternative diagnosis, potassium hydroxide examination of scales for dermatophyte hyphae may be useful to establish the cause of the rash (Hsu et al., 2001).
Differential diagnoses
A number of differential diagnoses should be considered in patients with a pityriasis rosea-like rash. These include guttate psoriasis, secondary syphilis, seborrheic dermatitis, nummular eczema, tinea corporis, lichen planus and pityriasis lichenoides chronic. Distinguishing features are highlighted in Table 1.
Differential diagnoses
A pityriasis rosea-like rash can also be caused by some drugs, including ACE inhibitors, hydrochlorothiazide, barbiturates, gold, metronidazole and allopurinol (Villalon-Gomez, 2018). This rash will usually resolve on withdrawal of the medication, confirming the drug as the causative agent. Other features distinguishing a drug-induced pityriasis rosea-like rash from classic pityriasis rosea include the lack of the herald patch, absence of prodromal symptoms, brighter inflammatory lesions, more intense pruritus with reduced benefit from anti-histamines and increased eosinophils in the blood and skin infiltrate in histopathologic analysis (Lahouel et al., 2021; Panda et al., 2014).
Pityriasis rosea and pregnancy
There is an increased risk of developing pityriasis rosea in pregnancy, likely due to an altered immune response (Drago et al., 2016). Studies assessing outcomes of pregnancy in patients with pityriasis rosea are limited, so a significant link between pityriasis rosea and unfavourable pregnancy outcomes has not been established. There have, however, been some reports of miscarriage, preterm delivery, low birth weight and weak motility or hypotonia in the neonate, especially if the mother is affected before 15 weeks gestation (Drago et al., 2008). Patients with pityriasis rosea before 15 weeks gestation or with atypical presentations will, therefore, benefit from close monitoring in their antenatal care and from dermatology input. In primary care, advice should be sought from secondary antenatal care services in any patient presenting with pityriasis rosea in pregnancy, regardless of the gestation, to assess how closely the patient will require monitoring (Wenger-Oehn et al., 2022).
Treatment
Pityriasis rosea is mostly a self-limiting condition and usually resolves spontaneously within 12 weeks. The mainstay of management, therefore, remains watchful waiting and reassurance. Treatment options, if required, are for symptomatic relief. In secondary care, treatment may be offered to promote resolution when symptoms are atypical, more severe or prolonged beyond 12 weeks. At the point of initial presentation with just a herald patch definite diagnosis can be difficult, as highlighted in the case scenario. At this stage, it is reasonable to consider other common causes of the symptoms, such as tinea corporis, but bear alternative differential diagnoses in mind. The basic principle of conducting a clear and focussed history and examination helps correct diagnosis. For example, a history of a prodromal illness prior to appearance of the herald patch makes a diagnosis of pityriasis rosea more likely.
Since any treatment of pityriasis rosea is purely symptomatic at this stage it is reasonable to adopt a wait and watch approach, the case particularly if the patient is not experiencing any symptoms of pruritus or discomfort. The patient can be reassured at this stage with a planned follow up after a week for review.
Once the secondary eruptions appear, symptomatic relief can be offered with emollients, oral anti-histamines and medium potency topical steroid creams. Emollients help to soothe the skin and reduce skin dryness, when appropriate. Oral anti-histamines will reduce pruritus. Steroid creams are added if the pruritus does not settle with anti-histamines alone and to reduce any swelling and inflammation if necessary. In children the benefit of prescribing steroid creams should be weighed against the risks and reserved for moderate-to-severe symptoms if there is little relief from anti-histamines alone. Patients can be advised to avoid soaps and shower gels in order to avoid drying the skin and use a soap substitute instead. If the pruritus is more severe, then zinc oxide and calamine lotion are recommended, either separately or in combination. Oral steroids can be considered, but are reserved for extensive rash and very symptomatic cases usually after consultation with a dermatologist (Sonthalia et al., 2018).
Potential treatment options
Macrolides
Macrolides were previously considered a possible treatment for reducing the severity of pityriasis rosea. However, studies to assess the efficacy of macrolides for treatment have shown mixed outcomes. A triple-blinded study on using erythromycin taken daily for 2 weeks showed remission after 2 weeks in 65% of patients with gastrointestinal side effects being observed in 10% of patients (Chuh et al., 2016). However, another study reviewing the efficacy of erythromycin showed no benefit from treatment (Rasi, 2008). Similarly, studies with azithromycin and clarithromycin following up patients for 6 weeks also showed no improvement with treatment (Ahmed et al., 2014; Pandhi et al., 2014). There is conflicting and insufficient evidence for benefit from macrolide treatment, and they are not therefore recommended in current UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance.
Antivirals
In severe cases of pityriasis rosea, acyclovir has been considered as a potential treatment option. This is possibly because of the possible link between pityriasis rosea and HHV-6 and HHV-7. In one study patients who took 800 mg five times a day for 7 days did show significant improvement in their symptoms and resolution of the rash (Drago et al., 2006). A systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that acyclovir can be considered as a treatment option by dermatologists in extensive, relapsing or persistent disease (Rodriguez-Zuniga et al., 2018). A recent series of case reports of managing more extensive and prolonged symptoms highlighted that further, larger studies are required to establish clear guidance (Tzur et al., 2022). Research is ongoing and it is important to note that use of antivirals is not included in current NICE guidance.
Phototherapy
The use of phototherapy for alleviating symptoms and accelerating resolution in pityriasis rosea has shown positive outcomes, but is not included in NICE guidance. In one study, patients with pityriasis rosea and extensive symptoms were offered low-dose ultraviolet A phototherapy two to three times a week until the lesions resolved or there was no further improvement in their rash. Results were significant, but the study was small with only 15 participants (Lim et al., 2009). In another study of 100 patients, half underwent treatment with ultraviolet B phototherapy three times a week for 4 weeks and were compared with a placebo group of 50 patients receiving no treatment. Results of this study also confirmed improvement in both severity and symptoms of pruritus (Jairath et al., 2015). Further research and studies are still required before this can be considered as a mainstream treatment option.
Key points
Pityriasis rosea typically causes a mild, self-limiting rash lasting 6 to 8 weeks, with an initial herald patch It may have a viral aetiology, but no clear cause has yet been identified Patients with pityriasis rosea are often aged between 10 and 35 years and pregnant women are more likely to be affected All patients presenting with pityriasis rosea in pregnancy should be referred to antenatal services for assessment and monitoring Treatment, if required, is predominantly for symptomatic relief Atypical presentations and extensive disease should be assessed by dermatology to consider definitive diagnosis and where appropriate possible further treatment options
