Investigating the use of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring and prompt device: influence and acceptability

Abstract

Introduction:

Hand hygiene (HH) prevents the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. Electronic HH monitoring and prompt devices have been developed to overcome problems with monitoring HH and to improve compliance. Devices monitor room entry and exit and soap use through communication between ceiling sensors and badges worn by practitioners and the badges sense alcohol rub.

Objectives:

To investigate (1) the impact of devices on HH compliance, (2) how devices influence behaviour and (3) the experience and opinions of practitioners on the use devices.

Methods:

HH compliance was monitored (before, during and after system installation) by observations and alcohol rub usage. Compliance during installation was also monitored by the device. Healthcare practitioner interviews (n = 12) explored how the device influenced behaviour and experiences and opinions of wearing the device.

Results:

HH compliance improved during the period the device was installed. Practitioners reported the device increased their awareness, enhancing their empathy for patients and encouraged patients and colleagues to prompt when HH was needed. Practitioners’ reported better HH, gaming the system and feelings of irritation.

Conclusion:

HH prompt and monitoring systems seem to improve compliance but improvements may be undermined by practitioner irritation and system gaming.

Keywords

Hand hygiene behaviour change compliance electronic monitor and prompt healthcare-associated infections infection control qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

Camosso-Stefinovic

Gillies

Shaw

Cheater

Flottorp

Robertson

(2010) Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3: CD005470.

Bonetti

Eccles

Johnson

Steen

Grimshaw

Baker

Walker

Pitts

(2005) Guiding the design and selection of interventions to influence the implementation of evidence based practice: an experimental simulation of a complex intervention trial. Social Science and Medicine 60: 2135–2147.

Boscart

McGilton

Levchenko

Hufton

Holliday

Fernie

. (2008) Acceptability of a wearable hand hygiene device with monitoring capabilities. Journal of Hospital Infection 70: 216–222.

Braun

Clarke

. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

Davies

Walker

Grimshaw

. (2010) A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implementation Science 5: 14.

Dawson

Mackrill

. (2014) Review of technologies available to improve hand hygiene compliance–are they fit for purpose? Journal of Infection Prevention 15:222–228.

Edmond

Goodell

Zuelzer

Sanogo

Elam

Bearman

(2010) Successful use of alcohol sensor technology to monitor and report hand hygiene compliance. Journal of Hospital Infection 76: 364–365.

Ellingson

Polgreen

Schneider

Shinkunas

Kaldjian

Wright

Thomas

Segre

Herman

McDonald

Sinkowitz-Cochran

(2011) Healthcare personnel perceptions of hand hygiene monitoring technology. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 32: 1091–1096.

Fuller

Michie

Savage

McAteer

Besser

Charlett

Hayward

Cookson

Cooper

Duckworth

Jeanes

(2012_ The Feedback Intervention Trial (FIT)—improving hand-hygiene compliance in UK healthcare workers: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 7: e41617.

10.

Grimshaw

Thomas

MacLennan

Fraser

CRRC

Ramsay

Vale

LEEA

Whitty

Eccles

Matowe

Shirran

Wensing

MJP

. (2004) Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment 8: iii–iv, 1–72.

11.

Grol

(2005) Implementation of changes in practice. In: Grol

Wensing

Eccles

(eds) Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. London: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann.

12.

Huis

van Achterberg

de Bruin

Grol

Schoonhoven

Hulscher

(2012) A systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies: a behavioural approach. Implementation Science 7: 1.

13.

Kohli

Ptak

Smith

Taylor

Talbot

Kirkland

. (2009) Variability in the Hawthorne effect with regard to hand hygiene performance in high- and low-performing inpatient care units. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 30: 222–225.

14.

Kovacs-Litman

Wong

Shojania

Callery

Vearncombe

Leis

. (2016) Do physicians clean their hands? Insights from a covert observational study. Journal of Hospital Medicine 11: 862–864.

15.

Levchenko

Boscart

Fernie

. (2011) The feasibility of an automated monitoring system to improve nurses’ hand hygiene. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80: 596–603.

16.

Marra

Camargo

TZS

Magnus

Blaya

dos Santos

Guastelli

Rodrigues

Prado

da Silva Victor

Bogossian

Monte

JCM

. (2014) The use of real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance. American Journal of Infection Control 42: 608–611.

17.

Michie

Johnston

Abraham

Lawton

Parker

Walker

(2005) Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care 14: 26–33.

18.

Miles

Huberman

. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

19.

Pittet

Allegranzi

Boyce

and World Health Organization World Alliance for Patient Safety First Global Patient Safety Challenge Core Group of Experts. (2009) The World Health Organization guidelines on hand hygiene in health care and their consensus recommendations. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 30: 611–622.

20.

Pittet

Panesar

Wilson

Longtin

Morris

Allan

Storr

Cleary

Donaldson

(2011) Involving the patient to ask about hospital hand hygiene: a National Patient Safety Agency feasibility study. Journal of Hospital Infection 77: 299–303.

21.

Sahud

Bhanot

Narasimhan

Malka

. (2012) Feasibility and effectiveness of an electronic hand hygiene feedback device targeted to improve rates of hand hygiene. Journal of Hospital Infection 82: 271–273.

22.

Sharma

Thomas

Foster

Iacovelli

Lea

Streit

Polgreen

. (2012) The precision of human-generated hand-hygiene observations: a comparison of human observation with an automated monitoring system. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 33: 1259–1261.

23.

Srigley

Gardam

Fernie

Lightfoot

Lebovic

Muller

. (2015) Hand hygiene monitoring technology: a systematic review of efficacy. Journal of Hospital Infection 89: 51–60.

24.

Swoboda

Earsing

Strauss

Lane

Lipsett

. (2004) Electronic monitoring and voice prompts improve hand hygiene and decrease nosocomial infections in an intermediate care unit. Critical Care Medicine 32: 358–363.

25.

Venkatesh

Lankford

Rooney

Blachford

Watts

Noskin

. (2008) Use of electronic alerts to enhance hand hygiene compliance and decrease transmission of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in a hematology unit. American Journal of Infection Control 36: 199–205.

26.

Vicente

(2006) The human factor: Revolutionizing the way people live with technology. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.

27.

Ward

Schweizer

Polgreen

Gupta

Reisinger

Perencevich

. (2014) Automated and electronically assisted hand hygiene monitoring systems: a systematic review. American Journal of Infection Control 42: 472–478.