Promoting gender equity through health research: impacts and insights from a Canadian initiative

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently identified major knowledge gaps regarding gender and sex as determinants of health. Canada recognized the importance of mobilizing research, and informing programs and policies focused on promoting the health of males and females across their lifespans by creating a national research institute that is focused on the study of gender, sex and health. No other country has created a national research institute dedicated to gender and health. Other countries may benefit from the strategies used by this Canadian research institute to create and sustain success, including: (i) mechanisms for defining national research priorities; (ii) tools to optimize research excellence; (iii) vehicles to build research capacity and develop a research community; (iv) processes to convert new knowledge into practice, programs and policies; (v) creation of partnerships at both the national and international levels and (vi) solutions to challenges and obstacles. The development of a vibrant research community and powerful national and international collaborations promotes gender and health equity.

Keywords

capacity building gender equity social justice gender governance policy health promotion advocacy health institute Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Gender and Health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organisation (WHO). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2008.

Women and Gender Equity Knowledge Network. Unequal, unfair, ineffective and inefficient – gender inequity in health: Why it exists and how we can change it. Final report of the Women and Gender Equity Knowledge Network of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2007.

Lagro-Janssen

. Sex, gender and health: Developments in research. Eur J Womens Stud. 2007; 14: 9–20.

Phillips

. Defining and measuring gender: A social determinant of health whose time has come. Int J Equity Health. 2005; 4: 1–4.

Sen

George

Ostlin

. The case for gender equity in health research. J Health Manag. 2002; 4, 99–117.

Turschen

. Commentary: Gender and health. J Public Health Policy. 2007; 28: 319–321.

Wood

Blehar

Mauery

. Policy implications of a new National Institutes of Health Agency for Women’s Health Research, 2010–2020. Women’s Health Iss. 2011; 21: 99–103.

Springer

Stellman

Yordan-Young

. Beyond a catalogue of differences: A theoretical frame and good practice guidelines for researching sex/gender in human health. So Sci Med. 2011; 74(11): 1817–1924.

Lawrence

Rieder

. Methodologic and ethical ramifications of sex and gender differences in public health research. Gender Med. 2007; 4: 96–105.

10.

Messing

. One-eyed Science: Occupational Health and Women Workers. Philadelphia: Temple; 1998.

11.

Greaves

. CIHR 2000: Sex, gender and women’s health. Vancouver, Canada: BC Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health; 1999.

12.

Office of Research on Women’s Health. Agenda for research on women’s health for the 21^st century: A report of the Task Force on the NIH Women’s Health Research Agenda for the 21^st Century. Bethesda, USA: NIH; 1999.

13.

Kazanjian

Hankivsky

. Commentary: Reflections on the future of women’s health research in a comparative context. Why more than sex and gender matters. Women Health Iss. 2008; 18: 343–346.

14.

Hankivsky

Reid

Cornier

Varcoe

Clark

Benoit

. Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women’s health research. Int J Equity Health. 2010; 9:5: 1–15.

15.

Daley

MacDonnell

. Gender, sexuality and the discursive representation of access and equity in health services literature: Implications for LGBT communities. Int J Equity Health. 2011; 10: 40: 1–10

16.

Fuller-Thomson

Noack

George

. Health decline among recent immigrants to Canada: Findings from a nationally representative longitudinal survey. Can J Public Health. 2011; 102: 273–280.

17.

Oliffe

Kelly

Bottorff

Johnson

Wong

. “He’s more typically female because he’s not afraid to cry”: Connecting heterosexual gender relations and men’s depression. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 73: 775–782.

18.

Spitzer

Stewart

Kushner

. Gender, Sex and Health: Overview of Recent Research. Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Institute of Health Research, Institute of Gender and Health; 2003.

19.

Stewart

Kushner

Spitzer

. Discourse. Research priorities in gender and health. Can J Nurs Res. 2001; 33: 5–15.

20.

CIHR Institute of Gender and Health. Institute of Gender and Health: Reflections and directions. Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Institute of Health Research; 2007.

21.

CIHR Institute of Gender and Health. Internal assessment for 2011 international review. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Instititute of Health Research; 2011. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/43578.html

22.

Spitzer

Stewart

Gray

. Gender and Sex-based Analysis in Health Research: A Guide for Researchers and Reviewers. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Institute of Health Research; 2007.

23.

Spitzer

. Engendering health disparities. Can J Public Health. 2005; 96: 78–96.

24.

Kickbusch

Hartwig

List

. Globalization, Women and Health in the 21^st Century. New York, USA: Palgrave MacMillan; 2005.

25.

Pritchard

. Success Strategies for Women in Science: A Portable Mentor. San Diego, USA: Elsevier; 2005.

26.

Road Map towards the Implementation of the United Nations Millennium Declaration: Report of the Secretary-General. New York, USA: United Nations; 2001.

27.

Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women. Beijing: United Nations; 1995.