Formative research is a critical step for the development of interventions aimed at changing behaviours, as is the case of physical activity. This process permits obtaining detailed information about the programme application context. ‘Follow the Footstep’ is a quasi-experimental and longitudinal study in secondary schools, the aim of which is to increase levels of physical activity among adolescents. To inform the design of the intervention programme, formative research has been carried out to analyse the perceptions of parents, teachers and students, through six focus groups.
The social–ecological model was used both to carry out the formative research and then to design the programme, including five levels of influence on behaviour (individual, interpersonal, organizational, community and political), which are important when it comes to adopting a comprehensive intervention approach. The authors describe how the results of formative research were transferred to guide the design and development of the intervention. As results indicate, parents, teachers and students agreed on a need to intervene by engaging adolescents and their close social environment. The school centre is the key organizational structure to implement this intervention, supported by professionals and the community.
DemetriouYHönerO. Physical activity interventions in the school setting: a systematic review. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012; 13: 186–196.
2.
CardonGMVan AckerRSeghersJDe MartelaerKHaerensLLDe BourdeaudhuijIMM. Physical activity promotion in schools: which strategies do schools (not) implement and which socioecological factors are associated with implementation?Health Educ Res. 2012; 27: 470–483.
3.
CaleLHarrisJ. School-based physical activity interventions: effectiveness, trends, issues and recommendations for practice. Sport Educ Soc. 2006; 11: 401–420.
4.
WardDSSaundersRFeltonGMWilliamsEEppingJNPateRR. Implementation of a school environment intervention to increase physical activity in high school girls. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21: 896–910.
5.
LangilleJLDRodgersWM. Exploring the influence of a social ecological model on school-based physical activity. Health Educ Behav. 2010; 37: 879–894.
6.
MurilloBGarcía-BengoecheaEJuliánJAGenereloE. Empowering adolescents to be physically active: three-year results of the Sigue la Huella intervention. Prev Med2014. doi: 10.1016/y.ypmed.2014.04.023.
7.
YoungDRJohnsonCCStecklerAGittelsohnJSaundersRPSaksvigBI. Data to action: using formative research to develop intervention programs to increase physical activity in adolescent girls. Health Educ Behav. 2006; 33: 97–111.
8.
GittelsohnJHarrisSWhiteheadSWoleverTHanleyTBarnieA. Developing diabetes interventions in an Ojibwa-Cree community in Northern Ontario: linking qualitative and quantitative data. Chron Dis Can. 1995; 16: 157–164.
9.
KumanyikaSKStoryMBeechBM. Collaborative planning for formative research and cultural appropriateness in the Girls Health Enrichment Multisite Studies (GEMS): a retrospection. Ethn Dis. 2003; 13: 15–29.
10.
GittelsohnJEvansMHelitzerDAnlikerJStoryMMetcalfeL. Formative research in a school-based obesity prevention program for Native American school children (Pathways). Health Educ Res. 1998; 13: 251–265.
11.
PateRRWardDSSaundersRPFeltonGDishmanRKDowdaM. Promotion of physical activity among high-school girls: a randomised controlled trial. Am J Publ Health. 2005; 95: 1582–1587.
12.
FeltonGSaundersRPWardDSDishmanRKDowdaM. Promoting physical activity in girls: a case study of one school’s success. J Sch Health. 2005; 75: 57–62.
13.
MinklerMWallersteinNWilsonN. Improving health through community organization and community building. In GlanzKRimerBKViswanathK (Eds.), Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (4th Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008, 287–312.
14.
DzewaltowskiDAEstabrooksPAWelkGHillJMillikenGKarteroliotisK. Health youth places: a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of facilitating adult and youth leaders to promote physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption in middle schools. Health Educ Behav. 2009; 36: 583–600.
15.
OkelyACottonWLubansDMorganPJPuglisiLMillerJ. A school-based intervention to promote physical activity among adolescent girls: rationale, design, and baseline data from the Girls in Sport group randomized controlled trial. BMC Publ Health. 2011; 11: 658–668.
16.
StokolsD. Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol. 1992; 47: 6–22.
17.
FerreiraIHorstKVWendel-VosWKremersSvan LentheFJBrugJ. Environmental correlates of physical activity in youth – a review and update. Obes Rev. 2006; 8: 129–154.
18.
LawsonHA. Crossing borders and changing boundaries to develop innovations that improve outcomes. (Cagigal Conference, AIESEP). Sapporo, 2008.
19.
Devís-DevisJBeltrán-CarrilloVJPeiró-VelertC. Exploring socio-ecological factors influencing active and inactive Spanish students in years 12 and 13. Sport Educ Soc. 2013. Available from: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13573322.2012.754753. (accessed 12 May 2013).
20.
FirestoneWAHerriottRE. Multisite qualitative policy research. Some design and implementation issues. In FettermanDM (Ed.), Ethnography in Educational Evaluation. London: Sage; 1984, 63–88.
21.
CresswellJW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd Ed.). London: Sage; 2009.
22.
Newes-AdeyiGHelitzerDLCaulfieldLEBronnerY. Theory and practice: applying the ecological model to formative research for a WIC training program in New York State. Health Educ Res. 2000; 15: 283–291.
23.
HaerensLDe BourdeaudhuijIEibenGLauriaFBelSKeimerK. Formative research to develop the IDEFICS physical activity intervention component: findings from focus groups with children and parents. J Phys Activ Health. 2010; 7: 246–256.
24.
WilsonDKEvansAEWilliamsJMixonGSirardJRPateR. A preliminary test of a student-centered intervention on increasing physical activity in underserved adolescents. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 30: 119–124.
25.
BarnettTO’LoughlinJGauvinL. Opportunities for student physical activity in elementary school: a cross-sectional survey of frequency and correlates. Health Educ Behav. 2008; 33: 215–232.
26.
DeschesnesMTrudeauFKébéM. Factors influencing the adoption of a health promoting school approach in the province of Quebec, Canada. Health Educ Res. 2010; 25: 438–450.
27.
KriemlerSMeyerUMartinE. Effect of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: a review of reviews and systematic update. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45: 923–930.
28.
Camacho-MiñanoMJLaVoiNMBarr-AndersonDJ. Interventions to promote physical activity among young and adolescent girls: a systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2011; 26: 1025–1049.
29.
SmithAJ. Peer relationships in physical activity contexts: a road less traveled in youth sport and exercise psychology research. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003; 4: 25–39.
30.
WeissMRStuntzCP. A little friendly competition: peer relationships and psychosocial development in youth sport and physical activity contexts. In WeissMR (Ed.), Development Sport and Exercise Psychology: A Lifespan Perspective. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technological Inc.; 2004, 165–196.
31.
HaerensLDe BourdeaudhuijIMaesLCardonGDeforcheB. School-based randomized controlled trial of a physical activity intervention among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2007; 40: 258–265.
32.
OrnelasIJPerreiraKMAyalaGX. Parental influences on adolescent physical activity: a longitudinal study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007; 4: 1–10.
33.
AtkinAJGorelyTBiddleSJCavillNFosterC. Interventions to promote physical activity in young people conducted in the hours immediately after school: a systematic review. Int J Behav Med. 2011; 18: 176–187.
34.
Van AckerRDe BourdeaudhuijIDe MartelaerKSeghersJDe CockerKCardonG. The association between socio-ecological factors and having an after-school physical activity program. J Sch Health. 2012; 82: 395–403.
35.
De MartelaerKDe KnopPTheeboomMLeblicqS. Eindrapport Proefproject Flexibele opdracht leraar L.O. [Final Report on the Sport and Physical Activity Leaders]. Brussels, Belgium: Press Vrije Universiteit Brussel; 2002.
36.
Van AckerRDe BourdeaudhuijIDe MartelaerKSeghersJKirkDHaerensL. A framework for physical activity programs within school community partnerships. Quest. 2011; 63: 300–320.
37.
Van DuynMAMcCraeTWingroveBK. Adapting evidence-based strategies to increase physical activity among African Americans, Hispanics, Hmong, and native Hawaiians: a social marketing approach. Preventing Chronic Disease; 2007; 4: 1–11.
38.
GrenierJOtisJHarveyG. Faire équipe pour l′education à la santé en milieu scolaire. Montreal, Canada: Press de l′Université du Québec; 2010.
LizaldeELlanoM. (coord.). Plan integral para la actividad física y el deporte. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Deportes; 2009.
41.
HernándezJLVelázquezR. La actividad física y deportiva extraescolar en los centros educativos. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia; 1996.
42.
O’ConnorJAlfreyLPayneP. Beyond games and sport: a socio-ecological approach to physical education. Sport Educ Soc. 2012; 17: 365–380.
43.
PennyDJessM. Physical education and physically active lives: a lifelong approach to curriculum development. Sport Educ Soc. 2004; 9: 269–287.
44.
LytleLAWardJWNaderPRPedersenSWillistonBJ. Maintenance of a health promotion program in elementary schools: results from the CATCH-ON study key informant interviews. Health Educ Behav. 2003; 30: 503–518.
45.
VaroJJMartínez-GonzálezMA. Los retos actuales de la investigación en actividad física y sedentarismo. Revista Española de Cardiología. 2007; 60: 231–233.
46.
LawsonHA. Crossing borders and changing boundaries to develop innovations that improve outcomes. Trabajo presentado en el Congreso Mundial de AIESEP y Conferencia Cagigal. Sapporo, 2008.
47.
GoldmanKDSchmalzKJ. Being well-connected: starting and maintaining successful partnerships. Health Promot Int. 2008; 9: 5–8.
48.
DowdaMCSallisJFMcKenzieTLRosengardPRKohlHW. Evaluating the sustainability of SPARK physical education: a case study of translating research into practice. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005; 76: 11–19.
49.
NaylorPJMacdonaldHMWarburtonDERReedKMcKayHA. An active school model to promote physical activity in elementary schools: action schools! BC. Br J Sports Med. 2008; 42: 338–343.
50.
Australian Sports Commission and State Departments of Sport and Recreation and Education. Schools & Clubs: Ideas for Working Together. Canberra: Australian Sports Commission; 1994.
51.
Department of Sport and Recreation Western Australia. PasSport into Schools: Linking Sports with Schools. Perth: Department of Sport and Recreation; 2003.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
