Abstract
Shortly after a healthy default beverage (HDB) law took effect in Hawai‘i, requiring restaurants that serve children’s meals to offer healthy beverages with the meals, the COVID-19 pandemic struck. Efforts to contain the virus resulted in changes to restaurants’ operations and disrupted HDB implementation efforts. Economic repercussions from containment efforts have exacerbated food insecurity, limited access to healthy foods, and created obstacles to chronic disease management. Promoting healthy default options is critical at a time when engaging in healthy behaviors is difficult, but important, to both prevent and manage chronic disease and decrease COVID-19 risk. This commentary discusses COVID-19’s impact on restaurant operations and healthy eating, and the resulting challenges and opportunities for this promising health promotion intervention.
Obesity during childhood has lifelong impacts (1). Globally, over 340 million children and adolescents were estimated to be affected by overweight or obesity in 2016 (2). Numerous global health initiatives have sought to limit children’s sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption (3), as consumption is one important contributor to obesity and cardiometabolic diseases (4).
In the US, healthy default beverage (HDB) laws have gained momentum as a means to reduce children’s access to SSBs. These laws require restaurants that serve children’s meals to include a healthy beverage (e.g., water, milk) as the default option (5). HDB laws focus on restaurants because eating out is associated with higher SSB consumption than eating at home (6). These laws nudge people into healthier choices by relying on people’s tendencies to accept defaults rather than request substitutions (5). Voluntary restaurant policies changing children’s meal beverages and sides to healthy options have shown that customers accept healthy defaults, and that such policies can reduce the calories and sugar purchased (7).
On January 1, 2020, Hawai‘i became the second US state with an HDB law, joining California and several US jurisdictions who have adopted this promising practice. However, three months into the law’s implementation, the COVID-19 pandemic erupted, creating significant challenges for HDB implementation and enforcement, and for healthy eating generally.
COVID-19 impacts on restaurants
The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the way people socialize, work, and eat. Restaurants, the focus of HDB laws, have been particularly challenged by virus containment measures. In Hawai‘i, an emergency proclamation required physical distancing and ordered people to stay home, halting all ‘non-essential’ business, and deeming only restaurants ‘that prepare food for consumption off-premises’ as ‘essential’ (8). Fast-food restaurants that already prepared food for drive-through or carry-out continued operations, while other restaurant types sought to change practices or closed. Restaurants remaining open needed to modify employee procedures to prevent viral spread. Additionally, restaurants without online platforms needed to develop websites or engage third-party services (e.g., Uber Eats) to facilitate take-out and delivery, which increased in demand with stay-at-home orders.
Economic shutdowns have resulted in major declines in restaurants’ customer numbers and revenues (9). High unemployment rates (10) have eliminated many customers’ disposable incomes and exposure concerns kept customers home even when they could afford to eat out. To reopen, restaurants had to navigate new restrictions and address customer concerns about the safety of dining out (11). Current guidelines require six feet between tables (12), which, for many restaurants, has resulted in reduced seating capacity and lost revenue. Although third-party services have facilitated business, they include substantial fees, affecting restaurants’ already diminished profits (13). COVID-19 impacts on restaurants will require adaptations to HDB law implementation and enforcement.
COVID-19 impacts on healthy eating
As in many locations, the perceived high cost of healthy foods was already a barrier to healthy eating (14). Many with low incomes also have household food insecurity, defined as reduced ability to access quality foods or food generally, due to limited funds and other factors (15). The economic repercussions of COVID-19 containment efforts have exacerbated these preexisting challenges with eating healthfully. Panicked hoarding left grocery shelves devoid of low-cost items, and foods typically donated to food banks were stockpiled, creating donation shortages (16). Additionally, ‘essential business’ definitions unintentionally favored fast-food restaurants, who already offered carry-out and drive-through services. Consequently, access to fast-food restaurants, with their high-calorie, low-cost foods, has remained high, especially in low-income and racially/ethnically diverse communities, which have higher fast-food density than other communities (17). At a time when healthful eating can be challenging for many, and chronic diseases magnify COVID-19 effects (18), promoting healthful food environments and default options is critical.
Health promotion and HDB law challenges
New restaurant practices and reduced revenues resulting from COVID-19 have raised logistic challenges for HDB implementation and enforcement, predominantly around increased ordering from websites, apps, and third-party services, and restaurant decisions to comply with the law. Compliance guidelines indicate that all in-store and online menus need to list an HDB. However, online menus do not always accurately reflect what is offered inside restaurants (19). Also, the law allows restaurants to offer alternative beverages, but indicates that restaurants must first offer healthy options, and wait for a request before offering unhealthy options. Restaurants with self-ordering kiosks have complied with this regulation by creating layers of choices. Customers are presented with HDB options first, and must click forward to see additional options. Third-party services do not have layers; they indicate all beverage options for children’s meals simultaneously, which effectively circumvents the law.
It is unclear if third-party services fall under the scope of HDB laws, as these services are not offering the children’s meals; they are only facilitating ordering or delivery. Additionally, during the pandemic, restaurants have complained that some third-party services are establishing unauthorized websites with inaccurate information (13), which makes HDB law enforcement challenging. HDB laws need to clarify if third-party services are under their purview and how enforcement will be handled.
Prior to COVID-19, restaurant executives reported reticence to change children’s items because children’s meals were not high revenue sources (20). One study found that a regional restaurant chain successfully added healthy default options to their children’s menus without losing revenue; however, this was done through increasing meal prices (21). This may be unappealing to restaurants during an economic recession. Also, before the pandemic, it was recognized that restaurants might unbundle their children’s meals, selling beverages and entrées separately, to avoid the law. Restaurants’ decisions to comply with the law are more complex post-COVID-19. HDB implementation will be most effective if done in partnership with restaurants to reduce impacts on profits.
Health promotion efforts generally will also be challenged by the pandemic. Local governments are facing significant budget shortfalls, which will impact funding for health and social services (22). Globally, public health and healthcare resources for chronic disease have been directed toward addressing the immediate infectious disease crisis, which is anticipated to exacerbate chronic disease (23). Additionally, the economic recession has differentially impacted low-wage workers and people of color (24), populations that already faced higher rates of chronic disease and food insecurity prior to the pandemic (25). Health and economic disparities are also likely to increase post-COVID-19.
Health promotion opportunities
Despite these challenges, COVID-19 has created several unanticipated opportunities for reducing SSB consumption and promoting healthy eating. Reopening guidance recommends restaurants assign a staff member to fill beverages at the self-service beverage station (26) or discontinue their use altogether to mitigate viral spread (12). These changes would make refilling SSBs onerous and could reduce consumption. Guidelines also recommend technology be a part of restaurants’ recovery toolkits (27). As electronic menus, tableside app-ordering, and self-order kiosks replace paper menus and staff contact, guidance for online content and prompts will be needed to ensure compliance in virtual domains. However, if technology is standardized, it could improve how HDBs are offered at the point-of-sale by mitigating discrepancies between written menus and staff’s verbal offerings (19).
The global economic recession resulting from the pandemic has also opened a policy window for SSB fees, which can lower SSB consumption while generating revenue for governments to support vulnerable communities most impacted by COVID-19. For example, San Francisco, California, has used US$1.65m of their SSB fee revenues to ensure fresh produce is accessible to those facing food insecurity during the pandemic (28) and Seattle, Washington, has allocated a portion of their fee proceeds to fund a grocery voucher program for low-income families (29). This crisis has created a unique opportunity for Hawai‘i and governments globally to garner support for an SSB fee to both reduce SSB consumption and to invest in programs that reduce chronic disease and health disparities.
COVID-19 may create other health promotion opportunities. In recent years, health has been a priority for many US consumers (30); some in the restaurant industry predict this trend will continue after the pandemic (31). If restaurant and beverage industries are interested in capturing the healthy eating market, there may be opportunities for government–business partnerships to promote healthy eating (32). Public health practitioners could collaborate with local businesses to develop and promote low-sugar beverages or healthy grab-and-go meal options. The public’s focus on health due to COVID-19 could also aid health promotion and behavior change efforts. Media campaigns may gain traction if messages about the importance of losing weight, and managing and preventing diabetes and heart disease are framed around reducing the risk of negative outcomes from COVID-19. Recognizing the necessity in highlighting this connection, US health departments have already started pivoting their chronic disease messaging in conjunction with COVID-19 (33). In the austere post-COVID-19 times, it will be critical to continue to capitalize on synergistic opportunities and use creative solutions to promote health and healthful eating.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant challenges for HDB implementation and enforcement, and healthy eating in general, while highlighting the importance of policies that improve access to healthy foods to prevent and manage chronic disease. Understanding the new landscape created by COVID-19 can lead to improved design and implementation of HDB laws, and to novel opportunities to promote healthy food environments.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project was supported through a contract with the Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of the Hawai‘i State Department of Health (HDOH). HDOH employees with knowledge of HDB law implementation and enforcement participated in the drafting, revision, and submission of this manuscript. The contents of this commentary are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of HDOH.
